- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The rule is hindering the fielders ability to make a play
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:09 pm to Adam Banks
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:09 pm to Adam Banks
It doesn’t matter if he was attempting to make a play. If the runner is running in the base path, he’s not obligated to make some crazy maneuver to dodge the fielder going for a poor throw. Jesus use your head
1
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:09 pm to Lou Pai
If you think about it, it was the Astros who got screwed.
Our pitchers arm got cold over a farce of a review.
Astros should think about protesting imo
Our pitchers arm got cold over a farce of a review.
Astros should think about protesting imo
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:10 pm to Lou Pai
quote:
The runner wasn't running in the base path there
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:10 pm to Adam Banks
yall got a bad call. its ok, it happens. no need to do this bullshite
This post was edited on 10/29/19 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:11 pm to KosmoCramer
If a member of the team at bat (other than a runner) hinders a fielder's attempt to field a thrown ball, the ball is dead, the runner on whom the play is being made shall be declared out and all runners return to the last legally occupied base at the time of the interference
If the batter-runner is adjudged not to have hindered a fielder attempting to make a play on a batted ball, and if the base runner’s interference is adjudged not to be intentional, the batter-runner shall be awarded first base
Here are the two parts of the rule book I found about impeding the throw. Based off of this, I think the call was wrong because it wasn't intentional. I didn't see anything about running between the lines, but I'm no rules expert
If the batter-runner is adjudged not to have hindered a fielder attempting to make a play on a batted ball, and if the base runner’s interference is adjudged not to be intentional, the batter-runner shall be awarded first base
Here are the two parts of the rule book I found about impeding the throw. Based off of this, I think the call was wrong because it wasn't intentional. I didn't see anything about running between the lines, but I'm no rules expert
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:11 pm to deaux
quote:
It doesn’t matter if he was attempting to make a play. If the runner is running in the base path, he’s not obligated to make some crazy maneuver to dodge the fielder going for a poor throw. Jesus use your head
The rule is as follows
A runner who is adjudged to have hindered a fielder who is attempting to make a play on a batted ball is out whether it was intentional or not.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:11 pm to Adam Banks
Dude this wasn't A-Rod slapping away the 1st baseman's glove.
Jesus.
Get some perspective on this idiotic argument that apparently some are living and dying with - conjuring up whatever they can to justify the call on the field.
Jesus.
Get some perspective on this idiotic argument that apparently some are living and dying with - conjuring up whatever they can to justify the call on the field.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:12 pm to Adam Banks
quote:you’re a moron. I can’t believe Astros fans are this ignorant about baseball.
Adam Banks
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:13 pm to WestCoastAg
I’m just educating people. You can choose to be ignorant I don’t care
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:13 pm to deaux
Read the rule
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:13 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
A runner who is adjudged to have hindered a fielder who is attempting to make a play on a batted ball is out whether it was intentional or not.
That’s not what happened idiot
The fielder threw his glove into the runner.
Not vice versa.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:13 pm to KosmoCramer
He was out the basepath until his last stride and there. that still shot doesn't prove anything because it doesn't capture the totality of the play when Yuli was trying to make a play. Like I said I dont like that call but it was technically correct.
This post was edited on 10/29/19 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:13 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
You can choose to be ignorant I don’t care
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:13 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Y'all also need to stop calling the Astros a terrible.fan base for agreeing with a call that helps them during the world series. Especially since nobody understands the call.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:14 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
attempting to make a play on a batted ball
I thought it was a throw, not a batted ball.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:14 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Adam Banks
You seriously are a fricking idiot.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:14 pm to TigerBB2021
Literally no one understands it. The office reviewed it.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:14 pm to Adam Banks
I'm not watching the game.
Are Astros fans melting or not over something that went their way. Because it sure seems like they are.
It's 5-2. Who cares.
Are Astros fans melting or not over something that went their way. Because it sure seems like they are.
It's 5-2. Who cares.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:14 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Dude this wasn't A-Rod slapping away the 1st baseman's glove.
Jesus.
The first baseman’s glove was inside the baseline and ended up 3 feet away prior to the runner reaching the bag.
Intent means nothing
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:17 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
The first baseman’s glove was inside the baseline
It’s like you don’t even know what you’re saying
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News