Started By
Message

re: The Dumbest Rule in College Football

Posted on 7/26/22 at 9:09 pm to
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8166 posts
Posted on 7/26/22 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Frankly, none of this gives a reason why it is fair for the defense to get possession when it didn't actually recover the ball.


So why is it fair for the offense to keep the ball when it didn’t actually recover the ball either?

The end zone is a different part of the field with different rules. It’s sort of like the paint in basketball, or between the blue lines in hockey.

There is a reward for making it into the end zone in possession of the ball. There is a consequence for fumbling through the end zone.

Why this baffles people is baffling to me.
Posted by Zap Rowsdower
MissLou, La
Member since Sep 2010
13250 posts
Posted on 7/26/22 at 10:33 pm to
When the nose of the ball immediately crosses the goal line on a run it’s a TD regardless of what happens after that but a receiver can have the ball in his possession and touch down with his feet in the endzone but drop it and it’s not a TD. I know that sounds like a weird description but I hope y’all know what I’m talking about

I know there’s the whole make a football move or 3 seconds of possession thing but it just doesn’t make sense to me why a running play gets the immediate touchdown call in the same split second that a receiver has the ball in his possession with a foot down in the EZ before a drop.
Posted by Roscoe14
Member since Jul 2021
173 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 11:02 am to
quote:

So why is it fair for the offense to keep the ball when it didn’t actually recover the ball either?

Because that is the way it works everywhere else on the field.

Look, these games are important to a lot of people. The players, coaches and fans are entitled to rules that result in a fair outcome. Justifying a counter-intuitive and arbitrary change of possession because "the end zone is different" doesn't cut it.

This rule is a dinosaur that is only still around because it deals with an event that doesn't happen very often. It should still be changed.
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
5619 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 12:22 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/27/22 at 11:31 pm
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7524 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

I know there’s the whole make a football move or 3 seconds of possession thing but it just doesn’t make sense to me why a running play gets the immediate touchdown call in the same split second that a receiver has the ball in his possession with a foot down in the EZ before a drop.




because the running back has already established possession. and the play ends when an offensive player with possession of the football crosses the plane.

the receiver has to establish possession by completing the catch, just like he would anywhere else on the field.
it's not a TD until he completes the catch to establish possession.

Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8166 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Because that is the way it works everywhere else on the field.


The field has different characteristics and rules from the end zone.

I'm not just making this up to justify the rule; the end zone is literally a different place that has special characteristics. The rulebook references this often - the goal line is "the opponent's goal line". A touchback occurs if the ball becomes dead out of bounds behind the goal line, or if a defender has the ball "behind their own goal line."

You clearly don't like this, or don't want to hear it, or perhaps cannot comprehend it. That doesn't make it untrue, nor does it mean it's a bad rule.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram