- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: the bulls and their excessive physical style vs el heat
Posted on 5/9/13 at 2:36 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Posted on 5/9/13 at 2:36 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
You're giving Spoelstra too much credit.
The Heat won because they were the obviously better team yesterday.
The Heat won because they were the obviously better team yesterday.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 2:40 pm to Louie T
quote:i think so. it probably just shook out that way. but it would behoove them to do it again in game 3. takes away from the bulls gameplan and allows the heat to play theirs.
You're giving Spoelstra too much credit.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 2:44 pm to Louie T
quote:
You're giving Spoelstra too much credit.
Yeah, that was vintage Pat Riley
Posted on 5/9/13 at 2:51 pm to Louie T
quote:
You're giving Spoelstra too much credit.
The Heat won because they were the obviously better team yesterday.
Am I the only one who sees the fallacy in this?
Posted on 5/9/13 at 2:57 pm to SabiDojo
It is possible to develop an efficient offensive and defensive system for 3 really good players and a cast of well put together role players without also devising a plan of getting your players to run around hacking and tackling other players to get the refs to call a tighter game so it more benefits your team.
I'm not in the "Spoelstra is a garbage coach; anyone can do what he does crowd", but I think the OP is a little far-fetched.
I'm not in the "Spoelstra is a garbage coach; anyone can do what he does crowd", but I think the OP is a little far-fetched.
Popular
Back to top

3






