- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/23/09 at 6:12 am to tduecen
quote:
1 National Title
actually 2 NC's
Posted on 7/23/09 at 6:13 am to LSUTANGERINE
Yes, as the thread onthe Rant pointed out, you all are over USC and 2003. 
Posted on 7/23/09 at 6:14 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
actually 2 NC's
If USC wins it this year. There is NO question!!!!
Posted on 7/23/09 at 6:54 am to dukke v
Folks, there are two years left. not one. Decades beging with 1's and end on the 10 (e.g., 1-10, 11-20....2001-2010, 2011-2020, 2021-2030, etc.)
So the conjecture is at least one year earl.
But whoever ends with more NC's aftre the 2010 season will have it, assuming all three have two more great seasons with BCS berths. If no one does you'll have to look at BCS bowl records too.
Unless LSU ends up with more NC's than UF or pounds them the way UF did to LSU recently, they are out. As of now, no way you can out them above UF even with the same # of NC's.
But no matter how you count it, the above will determine, IMO.
So the conjecture is at least one year earl.
But whoever ends with more NC's aftre the 2010 season will have it, assuming all three have two more great seasons with BCS berths. If no one does you'll have to look at BCS bowl records too.
Unless LSU ends up with more NC's than UF or pounds them the way UF did to LSU recently, they are out. As of now, no way you can out them above UF even with the same # of NC's.
But no matter how you count it, the above will determine, IMO.
This post was edited on 7/23/09 at 7:08 am
Posted on 7/23/09 at 7:11 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Folks, there are two years left. not one.
One season left dude
This coming football season will be the 2009-2010 season
The last CFB season of this decade. The championship games are in 2010. By your theory this decade will still go into 2011 with the BCS games
Posted on 7/23/09 at 7:14 am to ike221
quote:
Decades beging with 1's and end on the 10
00 - 01
01 - 02
02 - 03
03 - 04
04 - 05
05 - 06
06 - 07
07 - 08
08 - 09
09 - 10
This post was edited on 7/23/09 at 7:14 am
Posted on 7/23/09 at 7:19 am to ike221
quote:
This coming football season will be the 2009-2010 season
No. Even though a few bowl games played in 10, the NC will be the 09 NC's, not the 09/10 NC's.
This post was edited on 7/23/09 at 7:21 am
Posted on 7/23/09 at 7:24 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
No. Even though a few bowl games played in 10, the NC will be the 09 NC's, not the 09/10 NC's.
Did you look at my follow up post?
I'm using your logic
I'm right you are wrong
Posted on 7/23/09 at 7:30 am to LSUTANGERINE
Ok.
Well the stats posted on the first page are of 2000-01 and on
I'm going by that
Didn't the New Millenium start in 2000. The New decade did as well. So did the new century
[link=(
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000%E2%80%932009)]LINK[/link]
Well the stats posted on the first page are of 2000-01 and on
I'm going by that
Didn't the New Millenium start in 2000. The New decade did as well. So did the new century
[link=(
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000%E2%80%932009)]LINK[/link]
quote:
The 2000s decade runs from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2009.
Posted on 7/23/09 at 7:31 am to ike221
You see decades start with 0's and end with 9's
CFB decades in terms of end of the years with BCS games, start with 01's and end with 10's
CFB decades in terms of end of the years with BCS games, start with 01's and end with 10's
Posted on 7/23/09 at 7:36 am to ike221
The new millennium started in 2001.
Posted on 7/23/09 at 8:02 am to Sophandros
quote:
The new millennium started in 2001.
Posted on 7/23/09 at 8:16 am to tduecen
quote:
4-5 In bowl games
Hurts Florida IMO.
Posted on 7/23/09 at 8:25 am to SprintFun
Losing to the same Michigan team that lost to App. State hurts UF.
Pre-Carroll years hurt USC.
Too many 4+ loss years hurt LSU.
Epic fails in bowls hurt OSU and OU.
Epic fails in the Red River Shootout hurt Texas.
IMO, this should be about who was the most consistent, best overall record, best bowl record, and most high draft picks (decent judge of talent).
Pre-Carroll years hurt USC.
Too many 4+ loss years hurt LSU.
Epic fails in bowls hurt OSU and OU.
Epic fails in the Red River Shootout hurt Texas.
IMO, this should be about who was the most consistent, best overall record, best bowl record, and most high draft picks (decent judge of talent).
Posted on 7/23/09 at 8:27 am to Sophandros
quote:
IMO, this should be about who was the most consistent, best overall record, best bowl record, and most high draft picks (decent judge of talent).
USC IMO. How many consecutive BCS bowls have they been in?
Posted on 7/23/09 at 8:27 am to Sophandros
yeah but high draft picks don't mean as much if a lot turn out to be busts. that just shows what many laymen don't want to admit: NFL GMs are about hype and get caught up in the hype of prospects quite often
Posted on 7/23/09 at 9:42 am to DestrehanTiger
quote:
I think if UT wins this year, then they are in the discussion. I don't think the same can be said for OU. Their recent BCS troubles hurt their argument greatly. I really think if LSU, UF, or USC wins it this year, that team will have soul claim to team of the decade. If, let's say Penn St wins, I think you have to go with USC. They have 2 titles and pretty much a BCS birth every single season.
OU would have a good argument if they win this year. That would be two national titles (tied with Florida and LSU) and five title game appearances. That's a very strong case/
Southern Cal, not so much. It's like calling the criminoles the team of the 1990s. The criminoles just beat up on a joke of a conference.
Posted on 7/23/09 at 12:05 pm to Sophandros
quote:
The new millennium started in 2001.
but the decade started in 2000?
Popular
Back to top



0





