- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:15 pm to RummelTiger
Ok. So just add 1 to each case.
4 spots out vs 2 spots out. That's not a better chance?
4 spots out vs 2 spots out. That's not a better chance?
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:17 pm to jlc05
quote:
No, thats a fail
How? Either Minn. is a good enough OOC win to trump head-to-head (when arguing TCU-Baylor) meaning they're a quality opponent, yet they're 5th in a conference. So if they're fifth and still a quality win, the other four teams must be pretty solid, right? Meaning tOSU schedule isn't as shite as everyone makes it out to be.
OR
The B1G sucks and tOSU schedule is weak, inherently making Minnesota a much weaker team and actually not that good of a win. Meaning the main argument for TCU over Baylor, which was OOC conference schedule isn't as great as to he made out.
Can't have it both ways. And either way, TCU is the odd man out. In option A tOSU gets the trump card. In option B Baylor gets the trump.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:19 pm to PurpleDrank18
I'll say it again. You're part of the discussion. Be happy with that.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:20 pm to Chair
quote:
Ok. So just add 1 to each case.
4 spots out vs 2 spots out. That's not a better chance?
Again, I'm not sure why you keep asking me this. I've never said anything about better or worse chances. The simple answer to your question is yes - everyone now has a better chance thanks to them doubling the number of teams that have a direct chance at the title.
That said, looking at the scenarios that you have provided, TCU is left out of both, so it's a moot point.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:20 pm to Chair
quote:
I'll say it again. You're part of the discussion. Be happy with that.
lol... Why are you saying that to Purple Drank?
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:21 pm to RummelTiger
quote:And Ole Miss won the SEC West in 2003.
Uh... Yeah we did.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:25 pm to nvasil1
quote:
It wasn't from left field. The committee ranked everyone last week based on what they felt they had accomplished to that point. They did the same this week. The totality of the whole season was accounted for, not just this weekend's results.
You're highlighting some of my points in here when you say they are tallying the whole season into the metrics, not just this weekend's results.
A.) We didn't have a full week in between meetings for a matured reasoning of events.
B.)The events which did take place do not hold weight with the actions they invoked.
Once again you have an extremely short time span where a team who was 3rd in the country by the committees metrics on the last week of the season involving 90% of the body of work giving you a 50+ point victory of a conference rival for the last 10% of the equation.
It just seems like this last 10% for certain teams held 90% of the weight and others it didn't.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:25 pm to Gmorgan4982
quote:
Gmorgan4982
Ah, the classic did not read far enough mistake...
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:37 pm to ohmdawg
Jeff Long said the margin between 3 and 6 was already razor thin. You need to forget about the previous rankings and 5 days ago. That doesn't matter in these final rankings. And yes, wins against ranked teams will be valued above a win over a 2-10 team, regardless when the games were played.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:39 pm to RummelTiger
quote:I got to the post I quoted, stopped what I was doing and replied. Anything over two pages is really tough for a slow reader like myself.
Ah, the classic did not read far enough mistake...
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:40 pm to Gmorgan4982
quote:
I got to the post I quoted, stopped what I was doing and replied. Anything over two pages is really tough for a slow reader like myself.
Hope you've been well...
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:59 pm to alabamabuckeye
quote:
alabamabuckeye
quote:
alabama fan
quote:
TCU didnt even win their conferene, bruh.
Lmao
Kill yourself, really
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:01 pm to ohmdawg
quote:
TCU was robbed blind
Er, no.
The preliminary standings were not in any way binding. It was pretty stupid of the committee to publish them at all.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:11 pm to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
at the order of the schedule being a criteria
well we are trying to find the best teams right now, not after a random weekend in October...
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:29 pm to alabamabuckeye
quote:
TCU didn't even win their conference, bruh.
Really? You're going to use this against somebody?
Posted on 12/8/14 at 1:29 am to alabamabuckeye
quote:
TCU didn't even win their conference, bruh.
Posted on 12/8/14 at 1:40 am to TOPAL
quote:I don't think Oklahoma would have been jumped by Ohio State. This is just like 2011 in my eyes. bama jumped Oklahoma State, but if it had been OU or Texas, I don't think bama would have been chosen over either of those two schools. In my opinion, TCU and Baylor were passed over this year because they are TCU and Baylor. Same with Oklahoma State in 2011.
I wonder what would have happened if TCU/Baylor was OU, would they get jumped?
Popular
Back to top



1





