- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Surpirsed about Washington not being ranked?
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:26 am
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:26 am
Is anyone surprised about this? They are sitting at 4-1 right now. Nobody is really even talking about them. They stunk it up against Eastern Washington to start the season and people have written them off since then.
Washington-30 Eastern Washington-27
Washington-40 Hawaii-32
Washington-38 Nebraska-51
Washington-31 California-23
Washington-31 Utah-14
The remaining schedule looks like this:
Colorado
@ Stanford
Arizona
Oregon
@ Southern Cal
@ Oregon State
Washington State
They should win at least 3 of those (CU, Oregon State, and Washington State). Any chance they could pull the upset on Stanford or Oregon?
Washington-30 Eastern Washington-27
Washington-40 Hawaii-32
Washington-38 Nebraska-51
Washington-31 California-23
Washington-31 Utah-14
The remaining schedule looks like this:
Colorado
@ Stanford
Arizona
Oregon
@ Southern Cal
@ Oregon State
Washington State
They should win at least 3 of those (CU, Oregon State, and Washington State). Any chance they could pull the upset on Stanford or Oregon?
6
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:28 am to LSUbase13
Their resume isn't really that impressive.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:32 am to Srbtiger06
I don't know, it's more impressive than Virginia Tech, Baylor, and Illinois in my opinion.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:34 am to LSUbase13
Eh...possibly. Even then though line Washington up with those teams mentioned. Do they win?
VT - Loss
Illinois - Probably a loss
Baylor - Probably a loss
VT - Loss
Illinois - Probably a loss
Baylor - Probably a loss
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:35 am to LSUbase13
Keith Price reminds me a lot of Russell Wilson, and Chris Polk might be the most underrated player in college football.
Colorado - W
@ Stanford - L
Arizona - W
Oregon - Toss
@ Southern Cal - W
@ Oregon State - W
Washington State - W
Colorado - W
@ Stanford - L
Arizona - W
Oregon - Toss
@ Southern Cal - W
@ Oregon State - W
Washington State - W
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:36 am to LSUbase13
quote:
Is anyone surprised about this?
Every husky fan I know is and won't shup up about it. Nebraska looks to be overrated and they whooped em. Utah doesn't seem to be ready for the big boy schedule either. Win some more and they'll be ranked.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:36 am to Srbtiger06
quote:
VT - Loss
Illinois - Probably a loss
Baylor - Probably a loss
Baylor would be a shoot out, and they might lose. But VT and Illinois are wins.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:36 am to paperstreet
Oregon will smash them.
They'll be a team that gets solidly beat by superior teams but beats who they are supposed to.
They'll be a team that gets solidly beat by superior teams but beats who they are supposed to.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:37 am to paperstreet
quote:
Baylor would be a shoot out, and they might lose. But VT and Illinois are wins.
Eh...VT has a huge edge on defense and I think they'd take it.
Illinois, IDK. I can't figure them out but I would lean loss. Slightly.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:40 am to LSUbase13
quote:
Any chance they could pull the upset on Stanford or Oregon?
No. They might break the streak of losing to Oregon by 20 or more points. They might only lose by ten-19 this time.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:41 am to SprintFun
quote:should be enough for a 15-20 ranking at the end of the year
They'll be a team that gets solidly beat by superior teams but beats who they are supposed to.
but they lost their all-everything qb, so they can't possibly be better this year than last year...
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:42 am to Srbtiger06
quote:
VT - Loss
could be...
quote:
Illinois - Probably a loss
Baylor - Probably a loss
I think they could hang with both of those teams and can beat them.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:44 am to baytiger
quote:
but they lost their all-everything qb, so they can't possibly be better this year than last year...
I get the sarcasm
But this team has more talent than last years team had. Not to mention, they actually have a legit TE this year in ASF.
I wasn't high on Price coming into the year, but he has impressed me. And he's only a sophomore.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:45 am to baytiger
quote:
but they lost their all-everything qb, so they can't possibly be better this year than last year...
My Husky buddy says....frick Jake Locker....we got Teeth Price. I think the qb they have now has looked pretty good. He certainly has more of a team around him. The defense is the weaker part of the team and they give up points.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:48 am to paperstreet
quote:
they actually have a legit TE this year in ASF.
Damn that guy is gonna be good. They don't utilize him enough imo.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:49 am to Srbtiger06
quote:
Eh...VT has a huge edge on defense and I think they'd take it.
Idk
Va Tech didn't impress me at all on defense for playing at home in a matchup of two top 15 teams.
Tahj Boyd didn't have his best game and was still able to put up nice numbers against that defense.
Va Tech would be able to run on Washington, but I have seen nothing from Logan Thomas to convince me that he's even close to being a decent passer.
It would be close, but Washington would win. Just my opinion.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:54 am to LSUintheNW
quote:
Damn that guy is gonna be good.
agreed. LOL at the coaches around the country who thought he was more of an offensive lineman.
quote:
They don't utilize him enough imo.
agree here too. Big game (for a TE) against Hawaii.. 3 catches for 91 yards. Otherwise he's had 54 yards or less in every other game.
But with Polk in the backfield, Kearse and Williams along with Aguilar and Johnson at reciever, there's a lot of guys there that can do work.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 11:54 am to Srbtiger06
quote:
VT - Loss
VaTech is flat out terrible. Biggest fraud to date this CFB season. Why they are still ranked is beyond me. They haven't beaten a team with a pulse...at least UW beat Utah.
VaTech is this years poster-child for the laziness of poll voters and fans...if you get lucky enough to be voted in the preseason top 15, you really have to stink it up to eventually fall out.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 12:01 pm to paperstreet
quote:
LOL at the coaches around the country who thought he was more of an offensive lineman.
I think he would have been good there too but I would rather play TE if it were me. That guy is gone in three years so enjoy him.
quote:
But with Polk in the backfield, Kearse and Williams along with Aguilar and Johnson at reciever, there's a lot of guys there that can do work.
Oh I know I'm just a guy who loves the TE position and think they are very important to any game plan. Especially when they have the athleticism this guy has....how many linebackers aren't at a disadvantage when lined up against him?
Posted on 10/4/11 at 12:18 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
it's more impressive than Virginia Tech
VT hasn't beat an AQ school yet and is still ranked, thanks to them being overrated every preseason
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News