Started By
Message

re: Stafford or Sanchez-does either make Pro Bowl and who does first?

Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:01 pm to
Posted by CunningLinguist
Dallas, TX
Member since Mar 2006
19074 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:01 pm to
Sanchez has more potential at this point. I'm not sold on him being a top flight starter yet but he's definitely got more chance then Stafford. Stafford will end up as a middle tier NFL starter at best.
This post was edited on 4/2/10 at 11:02 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285051 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

If i recall correctly towards the end of the season Sanchez looked like shite.


he played great in the playoffs.


the games leading up to the playoffs, the Jets backed into. Colts and i think it was the Bengals didnt even play the starters. Sanchez didnt play bad in either game
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

he played great in the playoffs


he is talking about the last few weeks of the season before the playoffs obviously.

he played awful against sd as well. Sanchez played horribly against the bengals.
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

he played great in the playoffs


he is talking about the last few weeks of the season before the playoffs obviously.

he played awful against sd as well. Sanchez played horribly against the bengals.
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Stafford will end up as a middle tier NFL starter at best.


you can tell that from one season with the shitty talent he had around him?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285051 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

he played awful against sd as well.


right, he only led the go ahead TD drive to win the game.

did you even watch teh game?

quote:

Sanchez played horribly against the bengals


12-15 182 yards and a TD is horrible???



again, you dont know shite about football. stick to soccer
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

I think Sanchez will be more likely to win a ring though.


woah slow down.............
Posted by CunningLinguist
Dallas, TX
Member since Mar 2006
19074 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

you can tell that from one season with the shitty talent he had around him?


That's like my opinion, man. Just do the board a favor and quit acting like you are some football expert. You are not. Your attempts at analysis of everything are laughable.

Edited because my grammar sucks drunk
This post was edited on 4/2/10 at 11:11 pm
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

right, he only led the go ahead TD drive to win the game.

did you even watch teh game?


yeah and he also played like shite most of the game. The guy averaged 4 yards a pass. lol

quote:

12-15 182 yards and a TD is horrible???

nope. However, you failed to mention his avg. yards per completion which was a horrible 3.9 yards a pass. haha
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

again, you dont know shite about football. stick to soccer


and you are bias and only look at what you want to look at. I actually don't know hardly anything about soccer.
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

acting like you are some football expert


. i didn't realize giving my opinion made me appear an expert. I guess we all are experts then.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285051 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

yeah and he also played like shite most of the game. The guy averaged 4 yards a pass. lol



and they won the game on his beautiful pass on the run in the back of hte endzone

quote:

nope. However, you failed to mention his avg. yards per completion which was a horrible 3.9 yards a pass. haha



12 completions for 182 yards is 3.9 yards a pass???

ok Adam.

seriously, you dont know jack shite about football. Anyone can rip off articles.

Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

they won the game on his beautiful pass on the run in the back of hte endzone


ok great but what about the rest of the game?

quote:

12 completions for 182 yards is 3.9 yards a pass???

he threw for 63 yards the cincy game. GET IT RIGHT. I was talking about week 17 NOT THE PLAYOFFS.


quote:

seriously, you dont know jack shite about football. Anyone can rip off articles.

I never rip off articles. I'm sure i know alot more about football than you.
This post was edited on 4/2/10 at 11:22 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285051 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

he threw for 63 yards the cincy game. GET IT RIGHT.



you mean the game they won 37-0 when Cincy didnt give a frick and neither did NYJ when they ran the ball 57 fricking times???

ok adam

how about the next week, AT CINCY, when he was 12-15 for 182 yards and a TD??

not impressive, huh?

quote:

I'm sure i know alot more about football than you.


when you cant even get simple facts right about players...names, ages, colleges...


you really dont know shite
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

you mean the game they won 37-0 when Cincy didnt give a frick and neither did NYJ when they ran the ball 57 fricking times???


and sanchez STILL played like shite when they didn't care.
quote:


when you cant even get simple facts right about players...names, ages, colleges

1st. I've only ever gotten names and ages wrong retard.
2nd. who gives a frick if you know a guy's first name? STALKER MUCH?
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23288 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:41 pm to
Neither will make All Pro that is just ridiculous IMO.

Pro Bowl might turn into something not that special it appears.
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

Neither will make All Pro that is just ridiculous IMO.


don't you think it's to early to tell?
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23288 posts
Posted on 4/2/10 at 11:59 pm to
Over the last decade the only guys to recieve All Pro honors are Peyton, Favre, Brees, McNair, Warner, Brady, and Gannon. If I assume we will have some at least decenty comparable talent like that always I am going to say I do not see either turning into that talented of a QB. I think Stafford was overrated out of college also.
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 4/3/10 at 12:04 am to
quote:

Peyton, Favre, Brees, McNair, Warner, Brady, and Gannon


it's amazing how many h.o.f's there are in that list.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285051 posts
Posted on 4/3/10 at 12:06 am to
quote:

Over the last decade the only guys to recieve All Pro honors are Peyton, Favre, Brees, McNair, Warner, Brady, and Gannon.


10 years, 7 different QBs

Pro Bowl has 3 slots in each conf for a QB i believe

All Pro has 1 QB on their 1st team
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram