Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Should the NBA allow more roster spots?

Posted on 1/26/18 at 11:15 pm
Posted by Soup Sammich
Member since Aug 2015
3301 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 11:15 pm
Adding at least 4 active spots on game day. 17 dressed and active on gameday.

Would you be all for it and if not, why? Just something that's been on my mind and wondering why it wouldn't be a good thing.

Pros:
-I think it will be a huge improvement in stamina and injuries.
-it will show who the best coaches are and make promising young coaches better. With all the possible substitutions, coaches would have to adjust constantly.
-allow specialist a chance to make a team. 3pt specialist that doesn't have NBA level all around talent to thrive.(a great 3 point specialist that can get his shot off consistently at a 55% clip and be serviceable on defense would be a major weapon.
-could have an enforcer, a lockdown defense only guy, 3pt specialist. Lots of specialist positions could be used depending on the team.
-give diamonds in the rough their chance.
-make teams play and coach hard every game.

Cons:
-it would water down the overall talent in the league.
-would have to find 120 more players with NBA talent. Might be hard to do and some really bad players could slip in somewhere.

I think it would make the league much better, have much more intensity, more competetive and make the coaches much more involved and important.

I'm sure I could be missing lots of reasons why this would be a bad idea but right now I can't find many cons.




This post was edited on 1/26/18 at 11:17 pm
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27305 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 11:21 pm to
Literally nothing would change on game day. A coach isn't going 17 deep on his bench and putting those guys in the game.

Coaches don't even play their whole 13 man active roster as it is now.
This post was edited on 1/26/18 at 11:24 pm
Posted by Soup Sammich
Member since Aug 2015
3301 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 11:30 pm to
You would have a better chance of finding useful playable talent to keep teams fresher. You could play much more situational ball with specialist and more players.
Posted by Soup Sammich
Member since Aug 2015
3301 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 11:35 pm to
It's really an argument to have extra roster spots for specialists and for a higher chance to add really good talent that slipped through the cracks but never got the opportunity.
Posted by iamAG
Member since Aug 2015
3517 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 12:03 am to
I like your attempt but the idea is horrendous
Posted by charmander
Member since Dec 2014
137 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 12:11 am to
God no. Have you never noticed how awful those dudes that never get off the bench are.
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22802 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 6:01 am to
quote:

Have you never noticed how awful those dudes that never get off the bench are.


I mean they aren’t bad at basketball. It is just the NBA in general is super elite compared to college basketball and other professional leagues. Then there is a huge gap between the superstars and the average NBA player. Then the refs give some super stars an additional officiating advantage (looking at you Kobe and Harden).
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 9:20 am to
quote:

I mean they aren’t bad at basketball. It is just the NBA in general is super elite compared to college basketball and other professional leagues


So, in comparison, they're awful. Obviously any professional athlete is really good at their sport so let's not even start that frivilous arguement. I don't knock you for the idea, but it wouldn't change anything. Teams already only play about 7-8 dudes anyway. You maybe have a team or two that has a defensive specialist or something, but in general theres no point really. And owners aren't going to want to pay 4 more salaries, even at league minimum that's around 2 mil.
Posted by The Scofflaw
Metairie, LA
Member since Sep 2014
965 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 9:42 am to
ban thread, delete user
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 9:44 am to
I mean shite you usually have 3 DNP- Coaches decision in every game, a coach isn't using the players he has now. Why would he use 4 extras?
Posted by crazycubes
Member since Jan 2016
5256 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 1:39 pm to
I'm fine with 15. That's a clear 1st team, 2nd team, 3rd team. Not that a NBA coach thinks like that , though.
Posted by brg0320
Member since May 2009
3295 posts
Posted on 1/27/18 at 6:02 pm to
Haha what??

There isn't a level of basketball from Kindergarten to the NBA that has 17 roster spots.

That wouls be way too many disgruntled athletes that complain about playing time
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram