Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Should football play clocks have buzzers?

Posted on 11/26/18 at 9:52 am
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79420 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 9:52 am
We see this in basketball and it works pretty well. It makes replay easier.

There is a fundamental issue in football that the ref has to look at the game clock and the. Back to the ball to see if it’s snapped.
In this scenario he could listen for a buzzer. It would also add a visiual element for review.

Kinda makes sense.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 9:54 am to
I don't see why not?
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87468 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 9:55 am to
Yeah hell, juts a wrist band that vibrates, like in soccer.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116164 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 9:57 am to
I believe in the rule book it allows referee discretion when it comes to calling a delay of game within a second.

So a ref not throwing the flag immediately when it hits zero is not technically against the rules
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
35013 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 10:00 am to
quote:


There is a fundamental issue in football that the ref has to look at the game clock and the. Back to the ball to see if it’s snapped.
In this scenario he could listen for a buzzer. It would also add a visiual element for review.

Kinda makes sense.


the back judge has ONE responsibility after counting players and identifying his play keys... watching the play clock before the snap.. it's easy
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
35013 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 10:01 am to
quote:

There is a fundamental issue in football that the ref has to look at the game clock and the. Back to the ball to see if it’s snapped.
In this scenario he could listen for a buzzer. It would also add a visiual element for review.
wrong... the ref(white hat is watching the snapper and qb.... not the play clock...
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 10:06 am to
quote:

I believe in the rule book it allows referee discretion when it comes to calling a delay of game within a second.

So a ref not throwing the flag immediately when it hits zero is not technically against the rules


no shite. the thread is essentially asking if we should change this.

the answer is yes. if a clock hits 00, it should be a flag. you shouldn't have to wait until the ref sees it.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79420 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 10:09 am to
ok my point is, one person can’t watch both the ball and the clock.

Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62248 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 10:56 am to
quote:

ok my point is, one person can’t watch both the ball and the clock.



If the clock was on one side of the field. Since they're on both sides of the field, one person most certainly can watch both.
Posted by highbooost
Dayton, OH
Member since Sep 2016
1341 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 11:28 am to
I am a 100% all in on the buzzer like basketball, end of story, next subject.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram