- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sacramento Kings being sold to Seattle led Group
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:01 am to LawDawg1
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:01 am to LawDawg1
Bennett did not negotiate in good faith. No matter what Seattle did he was moving the team. The original owner and the city politicians also fricked them over. Bennett even paid the sports radio personalities to calm the people. I remember listening to several shows and the hosts all said they knew Bennett personally (weird) and that he wasn't moving the team.
frick clay Bennett. I thoroughly enjoyed lebron abusing the thunder in the finals. frick Bennett, and frick OKC.
frick clay Bennett. I thoroughly enjoyed lebron abusing the thunder in the finals. frick Bennett, and frick OKC.
This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 1:02 am
1
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:30 am to DelU249
glad to hear Seattle is getting a team back.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 4:14 am to JabarkusRussell
quote:i cant even.....
Kings fans can just cheer for the Warriors. It's 1 hour 15 minute drive.
Do you post on realgm? Cause there was a post on there earlier today that said the exact same stupid thing
This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 4:19 am
Posted on 1/10/13 at 4:33 am to JBeam
As much as I like Seattle getting a team back, really, the NBA could probably expand to 32 teams without a problem. If you look at OKC, Memphis, and San Antonio, the NBA has cashed in on having very good teams in areas that don't have other pro teams. Sacramento just happens to be one of the teams that hasn't had a good team in a while.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 8:07 am to WestCoastAg
i would have had 3 LA teams, 2 in the bay area, and one in San Diego or Las Vegas before i put one in Sac...
now what if they had won game 6 or game 7 vs. the Lakers that year?
now what if they had won game 6 or game 7 vs. the Lakers that year?
Posted on 1/10/13 at 8:15 am to mattz1122
quote:
Ironic that Seattle could be robbing another great fanbase of their team.
i'm just glad those fricking titty baby seattle fans can finally stop whining.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 9:17 am to Chad504boy
I will be an overnight Sonics fan.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 9:36 am to theOG
quote:
i'm just glad those fricking titty baby seattle fans can finally stop whining.
quote:
theOG
quote:
Oklahoma
Posted on 1/10/13 at 10:59 am to TDawg1313
Didnt Howard Shultz receive a ton of bad press for how he dealt with the SuperSonics dilema
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:04 am to TDawg1313
quote:
TDawg1313
quote:
my point exactly.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:43 am to theOG
quote:
my point exactly.
Yes, we should have been happy about it and just let a team that we supported for 40 years go without being vocal.
The guy bought the team, lied to the fans about wanting to stay in Seattle and doing everything possible he could to keep it here... all while trying to get it to OKC behind the scenes. ANY fans in our situation would be doing the exact same thing. It's nice to see how much support the Sonics had.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:43 am to Doc John
quote:
Didnt Howard Shultz receive a ton of bad press for how he dealt with the SuperSonics dilema
Yes. He was part of the problem as well.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News