- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Retarded Duke Hatred reaches New Low
Posted on 4/3/10 at 4:55 pm to Message Board User
Posted on 4/3/10 at 4:55 pm to Message Board User
quote:
But inserting their editorializing on the front page of the sports section is, um, juvenile. But this is what sports journalism has come to in 2010 and why the most respected writers come from intertube blogs such as marchtomadness.com or basketballprospectus.com. It is what it is, I guess.
It was satirical. The point of the article was that Duke is demonized, seemingly, by all of college basketball. The representation of Coach K was not editorializing the writer or paper's view of Duke or Coach K but highlighting how he is perceived - somewhat unfairly might I add - by opposing schools. The fact that people, including Krzyzewski, are unable to see what the photo represents is shocking to me. It was a clever, attention-grabbing picture that was perfectly in line with the article. Too bad no one has a sense of humor anymore.
Posted on 4/3/10 at 5:22 pm to SCTmo
Bottom line - it was juvenile and it was stupid and it shouldn't have run on the front page of the sports section a day before the Final Four starts. And with the Indy Star apologizing in print to Coach K, the writers and editors of the paper agree with me.
LINK
LINK
quote:
Editors from The Indianapolis Star, owned by Gannett, the parent company of USA TODAY, met with Krzyzewski, his wife and a few other Duke officials in the team's locker room at Lucas Oil Stadium to apologize after the team's practice Friday.
Jeff Rabjohns, The Indianapolis Star writer who authored the story, was "stunned" to see the artwork this morning. He said he wasn't aware of it until after he received numerous emails and voicemails early Friday morning.
"I had no involvement in the design whatsoever and was as stunned as anyone else to see that in the newspaper and horrified that it was above my byline," Rabjohns said.
Said sports editor Jim Lefko, "Coach Krzyzewski accepted our apology. The Duke people were very gracious about it."
Lefko said the drawing came together late in the day, was finished close to the deadline for the paper's state edition which goes to outlying counties and wasn't properly vetted.
"It didn't meet our standards," Lefko said. "It was one of those ideas that you start throwing around and by the time it came together, it was on deadline. ... It didn't get vetted."
Lefko said he called Duke officials Friday morning before some knew what had happened.
"When you are wrong, you admit," said Lefko, "and you apologize."
Lefko said the paper also plans an apology column in Saturday's editions.
Posted on 4/3/10 at 10:28 pm to Message Board User
quote:
Bottom line - it was juvenile and it was stupid and it shouldn't have run on the front page of the sports section a day before the Final Four
Posted on 4/3/10 at 10:36 pm to Baloo
quote:
Step one: remove stick from arse.
Step two: hit yourself upside the head with said stick.
Step three: realize the art was a joke.
Step four: move on with your life.
There's Baloo with his blind hatred of Duke.
It never fails. The most unbiased and best sports analyst on this board, possibly, completely goes blind when it comes to Duke.
I'm not even hating on you, it's just really funny.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 8:53 am to JEAUXBLEAUX
Jeauxbleaux, you speak the truth. Those who say otherwise are the ones who are participating in the nonsense. For example, someone claimed that Obama deserves the hatred directed at him. I sincerely doubt that the poster can actually cite any legit reasons for his treasonous statement (FWIW, I felt that some of the Left Wing vitriol directed at Bush was also treasonous) and given the attitude around here, I would not be surprised if it were based on something more sinister than "he's a Democrat".
Posted on 4/4/10 at 9:19 am to Sophandros
quote:
I would not be surprised if it were based on something more sinister than "he's a Democrat".
Yeah, it is because he is a fricking socialist. Liberal democrats are sewer rats but socialists are indeed more sinister.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 9:37 am to gthog61
You don't even know what the word 'socialist' means. Seriously, dude, if you actually looked at Obama's economic policies, you'd realize that they are the exact opposite of socialism. Everyting that the dude has done has been for the benefit of private industry, especially health care.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 9:48 am to Sophandros
OK, so we generally agree that MSM is favorable to Barry (because most are liberal and voted for him and Dems)
but tend to dislike Duke/Coach K.
Would it be Politically Correct for USA Today to post a similar pic of Barry on Front Page,
or how about a pic of Barry sucking on a cig...
but tend to dislike Duke/Coach K.
Would it be Politically Correct for USA Today to post a similar pic of Barry on Front Page,
or how about a pic of Barry sucking on a cig...
Posted on 4/4/10 at 9:48 am to JEAUXBLEAUX
quote:
No, the posters on the OT and Poli Board
This post was edited on 4/4/10 at 9:52 am
Posted on 4/4/10 at 9:51 am to SCTmo
quote:
Too bad no one has a sense of humor anymore.
Posted on 4/4/10 at 10:28 am to shel311
quote:
There's Baloo with his blind hatred of Duke.
Though I admitted to hating Duke in this thread, if you read this thread and the Coach K thread, my hatred has not been blind. In fact, I supported the concept that Duke has had extremely talented rosters because Coach K is a great recruiter and deserves credit for building the juggernaut.
Here, I think it's that Duke fans are looking for a slight where none existed. You have to want to be insulted to be insulted by that front page.
That's because Duke is a bunch of whiny cry babies (THAT'S Duke hatred).
Posted on 4/4/10 at 10:53 am to Baloo
quote:
Duke is a bunch of whiny cry babies
...we can agree that lots of "Hatred" is retarted..
...but which specific current Duke Players are: "whiny cry babies" ?
Posted on 4/4/10 at 10:58 am to Baloo
It is kind of funny when you post about Duke. I respect you as much as anyone on this board, but the Dukies bring it out in you I think. lol
Posted on 4/4/10 at 10:59 am to Baloo
OK, so we agree NO current Duke Players are: "whiny cry babies" 
This post was edited on 4/4/10 at 11:00 am
Popular
Back to top

2





