Started By
Message

re: Removing the "criminal element" from the Power 5.

Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:06 pm to
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:06 pm to
Dude, you're wanting the P5 to ban players because you don't want to watch them play on Saturday. Not because CFB is suffering, but because of your personal feelings. That's a SJW mindset.

Take a shot at the criteria that would result in someone being blackballed from P5.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6707 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Misdemeanor assault.
WOW! Someone once said "I can't define porn, but I will know it when I see it"(or something similar)

I can tell you for sure, the video I saw of Mixon punching that girl was NOT-misdemeanor assault.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:09 pm to
Therein lies your problem.

What people are convicted of rarely reflects what actually happened.
This post was edited on 1/13/17 at 1:11 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112428 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:26 pm to
If the infraction doesn't automatically get you kicked out of the school then it shouldn't automatically get you kicked off of a team IMO.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6707 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Take a shot at the criteria that would result in someone being blackballed from P5.
Being released by another P5 school for "violation of team" rules. Any convictions involving violence or drugs, whether it be "misdemeanor assault" or "misdemeanor possession of drugs"

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112428 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Being released by another P5 school for "violation of team" rules
Well, that sounds silly.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6707 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

If the infraction doesn't automatically get you kicked out of the school then it shouldn't automatically get you kicked off of a team IMO
Those 2 are not related and separate from each other. Fraternities are kicked off campuses all the time, but the students are not necessarily kicked out of school.

Are you suggesting that football players be held to the same standards as the whole student body? Then shouldn't they also be held to same academic standards for admission?
Posted by Ostrich
Alexandria, VA
Member since Nov 2011
9589 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Football is a violent game played by violent thugs. Accept that criminals are often the best players and just enjoy the game.


This. They are modern day gladiators. I think the issue is we look to football players to be role models when they aren't. Football players are entertainers
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6707 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Being released by another P5 school for "violation of team" rules
Well, that sounds silly.
The umbrella of "violation of team rules" covers a lot of different things. TM7 and I forget the LSU QB who was kicked off, were basically kicked off for violating team rules. One couldn't pass his drug test and the other kept getting into off the field problems.

A lot of times these things tend to work themselves out depending on which year of eligibility it happens. Many transfer down to the next level to be eligible right away.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112428 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Those 2 are not related and separate from each other.
What I said wasn't an absolute.

I said it shouldn't "automatically" get you kicked off of a team, like you're suggesting.

Everything is done on a case by case basis. And like it or not, an athlete's value will come into play in these decisions. That's how it's always been in all walks of life, not just sports, and that won't change here, nor should it.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
101639 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:41 pm to
You likely mean Ryan Perriloux.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Any convictions involving violence or drugs
Yeah, good luck with that.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6707 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

You likely mean Ryan Perriloux.
Yes, I couldn't remember his name. I knew that guy was trouble before he even enrolled at LSU, just from his recruiting antics.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6707 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Yeah, good luck with that.
I don't think there is chance in hell of any of this ever happening. If I was truly serious about this I would have written an email to all of the presidents of power 5 schools. I just think it is worthy topic for discussion on a sports message board.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:51 pm to
What you're proposing is banning a kid from P5 football for taking a swing in a barfight (not connecting, just swinging) or having a minuscule amount of marijuana in his possession. That doesn't seem a bit absurd?

Again, it's a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
This post was edited on 1/13/17 at 1:52 pm
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6707 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

And like it or not, an athlete's value will come into play in these decisions
And that is probably my biggest issue with how things are handled. If Joe Mixon had only been a special team player and not a 5 star RB he would have never played another down at OU. That just sets the standards lower for the best athletes while holding everyone else to higher standard.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
450289 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Art Briles accepted a player from Boise St with a known criminal past

had he been convicted of anything at that point?

serious question
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6707 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

taking a swing in a barfight (not connecting, just swinging)
Intent is kind of important.
quote:

having a minuscule amount of marijuana in his possession
I don't think the NCAA has minimum amount of allowable marijuana present to pass a drug test.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Intent is kind of important.

It's a fight. Fights happen in college. You want to ban him for getting into a bar fight and doing absolutely zero damage. Just taking a swing. These are the "criminal elements" you want to remove from the P5?

That's ridiculous.

ETA: Let's get a little more absurd with it. A player shoves someone. Banned from P5.
quote:

I don't think the NCAA has minimum amount of allowable marijuana present to pass a drug test.

Ok?
This post was edited on 1/13/17 at 2:10 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112428 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

And that is probably my biggest issue with how things are handled. If Joe Mixon had only been a special team player and not a 5 star RB he would have never played another down at OU. That just sets the standards lower for the best athletes while holding everyone else to higher standard.

That's not just in athletics. That is how it is in every walk of life. And I don't even think that's wrong, it makes sense, very logical IMO.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram