- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Picking up a flag after the PI was called
Posted on 1/4/15 at 6:57 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 1/4/15 at 6:57 pm to lsupride87
I would at least like to know why there was no explanation as to why the PI flag was picked up?
0
Posted on 1/4/15 at 6:58 pm to lsupride87
quote:
That the refs missed three calls in one play. It is still offsetting actually. So the person who said the penalty should be marked against Dez is wrong. Offsetting was the correct call there
if you have offsetting live ball fouls and then a dead ball foul , the dead ball foul is the only thing marked off. Read a rule book sometime
Posted on 1/4/15 at 6:58 pm to ChemE in the OP
Fact: it was Pi
fact: it was hands to the face
fact: dez should have been called for penalty
All still equals offsetting penalties. Hardly a fix
fact: it was hands to the face
fact: dez should have been called for penalty
All still equals offsetting penalties. Hardly a fix
Posted on 1/4/15 at 6:58 pm to lsupride87
quote:
What the frick? The defender is allowed to run after the receiver
Not through the defender while not playing the ball.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 6:59 pm to lsupride87
So they should've replayed the down?
Posted on 1/4/15 at 6:59 pm to lsupride87
I don't think this is correct..
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:01 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Fact: it was Pi
fact: it was hands to the face
fact: dez should have been called for penalty
All still equals offsetting penalties. Hardly a fix
was called PI and it was PI. That flag was picked up. Why? Hands to face was not called. Maybe it should have been -so should have O Holding later on Dallas. Not the point though.
Dez Bryant's penalty was a dead ball foul - that gets walked off regardless of the above.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:03 pm to fleaux
quote:This is incorrect I beleive
if you have offsetting live ball fouls and then a dead ball foul , the dead ball foul is the only thing marked off. Read a rule book sometime
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:03 pm to Overbrook
quote:I dont think it does
Dez Bryant's penalty was a dead ball foul - that gets walked off regardless of the above
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:04 pm to lsupride87
It's correct.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:04 pm to LSU alum wannabe
quote:Which is why PI should be called. The clear as day hands to the face occured before PI ever did
Not through the defender while not playing the ball.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:05 pm to OneMoreTime
quote:Dont think so
It's correct.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:06 pm to lsupride87
Offsetting penalties still highly benefits Detroit there
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:11 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:Def would help. i am simply arguing the fix is in shitheads. Dallas had more penalties than Detroit. The refs also called a huge offensive PI that was shite in the first against the cowboys. On the most controversial call against Detroit, they actually comitted a penalty that wasnt called
Offsetting penalties still highly benefits Detroit there
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:15 pm to MoreOrLes
Good thing you aren't a ref. The refs discussed the play and got it correct.
The ball hit the player in the back, before he face guarded ( Which I think is a stupid rule anyway, the object is to prevent a completion so face guarding should be legal ) so the interference call was bogus. Ball hits back, player then face guards.
Good thing you guys aren't refs.
The ball hit the player in the back, before he face guarded ( Which I think is a stupid rule anyway, the object is to prevent a completion so face guarding should be legal ) so the interference call was bogus. Ball hits back, player then face guards.
Good thing you guys aren't refs.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:23 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
Alabama Fan
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:25 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
Good thing you aren't a ref. The refs discussed the play and got it correct. The ball hit the player in the back, before he face guarded ( Which I think is a stupid rule anyway, the object is to prevent a completion so face guarding should be legal ) so the interference call was bogus. Ball hits back, player then face guards. Good thing you guys aren't refs.
So do you think a player should be able to run off the sideline and argue with an official with no penalty??
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:26 pm to fleaux
quote:Do you think a player should be able to stick their hands in a defenders facemask?
So do you think a player should be able to run off the sideline and argue with an official with no penalty??
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:28 pm to lsupride87
No I dont. And good job not answering my question
Posted on 1/4/15 at 7:28 pm to lsupride87
It would have been 15 yds and a 1st for Detroit.
Page 5 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News