
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Penn state could be a sleeper this year
Posted on 7/30/26 at 8:10 pm to JamalMurry27
Posted on 7/30/26 at 8:10 pm to JamalMurry27
+340 to make the playoffs on fanduel is juicy
Posted on 7/30/26 at 8:32 pm to JamalMurry27
Which schedule is harder:
Wisconsin (Green Bay)
Rice
Michigan State
@ Purdue
@ UNC
Stanford
@ BYU
Navy (Foxborough)
Miami (FL)
Boston College
SMU
@ Syracuse
--
Marshall
@ Temple
Buffalo
Wisconsin
@ Northwestern
USC
@ Michigan
Purdue
@ Washington
Minnesota
Rutgers
@ Maryland
Wisconsin (Green Bay)
Rice
Michigan State
@ Purdue
@ UNC
Stanford
@ BYU
Navy (Foxborough)
Miami (FL)
Boston College
SMU
@ Syracuse
--
Marshall
@ Temple
Buffalo
Wisconsin
@ Northwestern
USC
@ Michigan
Purdue
@ Washington
Minnesota
Rutgers
@ Maryland
Posted on 7/30/26 at 11:50 pm to GentleJackJones
That won’t be a sleeper they schedule just like NDs is 10-11 win or bust.IThe top 5 SEC teams had those opponents anything less than 11wins would be criminal.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 12:08 am to GentleJackJones
They won’t have as much pressure on them either. Or at least won’t be in the national spotlight until probably that usc game if they are undefeated. You figure they will have a decent defense for those softies they play and also assume they will have a decent run game. By no means am I saying they will be any different than any other Penn st team but all that matters to the committee is W’s and your typical (not counting last year) Ho him average Penn st team is losing a max of three games on that schedule and if they flip one more game and end the year with 2 losses that’s probably post season. And it will benefit them to miss the big 10 championship game cause they would probably lose that. The whole not being penalized for conference title thing could come up but at least they wouldn’t risk a 49-3 trouncing. On schedule alone I’d have to call them the big 10s biggest serious dark horse
Posted on 7/31/26 at 12:11 am to GentleJackJones
At Michigan and at Washington makes the second one harder. That first schedule is a damn joke. Alabama would look like Sabans teams against that schedule except against Miami maybe. If I’m on the committee that top schedule better not have one competitive game or I don’t see how I can put them in. And beating Miami is absolutely necessary or out. That’s the penalty for that schedule
Posted on 7/31/26 at 1:31 am to SulphursFinest
That’s what you all said about Big 10 schedules last year.
Then I watched Iowa’s linebackers beat the shite out of that midget qb who played for a “playoff contender.”
Who knows how bad or good any schedule is right now?
Then I watched Iowa’s linebackers beat the shite out of that midget qb who played for a “playoff contender.”
Who knows how bad or good any schedule is right now?
This post was edited on 7/31/26 at 2:12 am
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:35 am to lurking
quote:
I forgot who even took that job if I’m honest
Matt Campbell
Posted on 7/31/26 at 6:40 am to bisonduck
Crazy times we are in that Vandy is the team you use for your argument

Popular
Back to top

0






