- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Penn State 2026 slate is a Group of 5 Schedule
Posted on 10/13/25 at 1:47 pm to iwyLSUiwy
Posted on 10/13/25 at 1:47 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
or that the B10 is some playoff dynasty.
I know the term gets overused but this is a classic strawman argument. I haven’t seen anyone say the B1G is a “playoff dynasty” (which who really cares) only that an SEC hasn’t played for the title in 2 years which is true. How good a conference was over the years is irrelevant to how good those teams are now and has no bearing on who is the best team in a given season.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 1:50 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:No, but it shows the difference in depth between the conferences which makes for a much easier or more difficult conference schedule over a long period of time. Most B1G teams will only play 2 maybe 3 tough conference opponents a year while SEC teams are probably playing double that
All of that is true and it has absolutely nothing to do with who the best team Is in a given year.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 1:53 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
I know the term gets overused but this is a classic strawman argument.
It was in reply to a B10 guy saying SEC fans are circle jerking remembering all their BCS titles. Which is just ridiculous. The past two years are cuasing revisionist history for some people.
quote:
only that an SEC hasn’t played for the title in 2 years which is true.
O wow, that's groundbreaking news. Even if it wasn't obvious I acknowledge that in the post you replied to.
quote:
How good a conference was over the years is irrelevant to how good those teams are now and has no bearing on who is the best team in a given season.
I never said otherwise. I was replying to a comment in regards to the past championships, not what teams are currently the best.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 1:57 pm to The Third Leg
This shite means nothing. Tulane humiliated Northwestern, Northwestern beat PSU. Tulane got humiliated by Ole Miss. comparing random one off games is a Hilarious way to measure a team.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 1:59 pm to Sevendust912
quote:
India
The Red Dots are a legit top 10 team.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 2:05 pm to Tiger Prawn
quote:
but it shows the difference in depth between the conferences which makes for a much easier or more difficult conference schedule over a long period of time.
You don’t play games over a long period of time you play them in a given season and the quality of teams varies, widely in some cases from year to year.
quote:
Most B1G teams will only play 2 maybe 3 tough conference opponents a year while SEC teams are probably playing double that
You are looking at it totally over time, but that’s not how schedules work Especially with expanded conferences. Texas last year played only 1 team that finished in the top half of the SEC, you think Ohio State can’t handle that? UGA played the next 4 teams in the SWC standings and went 7-2 including the SECCG. Even with in the conference the relative strength differs.
But still none of that matters when discussing who the best team in a given year.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 2:25 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
It was in reply to a B10 guy saying SEC fans are circle jerking remembering all their BCS titles. Which is just ridiculous. The past two years are cuasing revisionist history for some people.
A) he’s not wrong
B) it looks like he was responding to a post (totally not a circle jerk) rattling off the number of teams that have won a title since the BCS started, so what history is being revised? Still don’t see where he claimed the B1G was a playoff dynasty.
quote:
I never said otherwise. I was replying to a comment in regards to the past championships,
And all he said was the SEC hasn’t played for the title which you acknowledge as fact so not sure what you’re point is.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:34 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Gtfo with acting like the past two years tells the playoff story or that the B10 is some playoff dynasty. The previous 8 years of the playoffs the SEC was represented in the national championship, winning 6 of them. And the two times they didn't win in that span, it was an ACC team that won.
Sport changed. Now everyone can pay top dollar, not just the SEC.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:41 pm to LSUButt
quote:
This shite means nothing. Tulane humiliated Northwestern, Northwestern beat PSU. Tulane got humiliated by Ole Miss. comparing random one off games is a Hilarious way to measure a team.
Yeah, I’m sure if Ohio state had trouble with a .500 G5 who had 50 point Ls to other G5 school on their resume, you’d say the same. Washington state is a bad football team with no resources.
Penn state is terrible. Good chance they don’t get to 6-6. They just fired their coach with a $50MM buyout if you don’t believe me.
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 10/13/25 at 9:40 pm to The Third Leg
quote:and no matter what, iowa, wisconsin, minnesota, michigan state, etc. will never win a national championship... and i didn't even mention the worst programs in the conference
The top ranked team in the SEC last week had a dogfight with Washington state, who lost by 49 points to ….. NORTH TEXAS. The SEC hasn’t even had a team qualify to play for a national title the last two seasons.
Yet here we are in the circle jerk with bros remembering all the BCS titles SEC teams won.
there is still a very wide gap between the sec and the big ten
Posted on 10/13/25 at 9:49 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
and no matter what, iowa, wisconsin, minnesota, michigan state, etc. will never win a national championship... and i didn't even mention the worst programs in the conference there is still a very wide gap between the sec and the big ten
Indiana has a shot this year. I think those old days are gone. The new era involves wealthy men who treat these programs like soccer clubs, except their labor is all seasonal.
Time will tell who is willing to pay.
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 9:51 pm
Posted on 10/13/25 at 9:53 pm to The Third Leg
quote:true. the middle tier big ten programs are in even worse shape than before nil. cignetti will take a better job and indiana will be done.
The new era involves wealthy men who treat these programs like soccer clubs, except their labor is all seasonal.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 9:58 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
He’s making $8M and they’ll pay him $15 to keep him if he has another run.
All these programs have super rich fans. Starting to see more and more get involved to fuel NIL. Rev sharing agreements going to players—The Big ten and SEC schools will all be able to dish out substantial payrolls.
All these programs have super rich fans. Starting to see more and more get involved to fuel NIL. Rev sharing agreements going to players—The Big ten and SEC schools will all be able to dish out substantial payrolls.
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 10:20 pm
Popular
Back to top

1







