Started By
Message

re: Official Week 8 College Football Bet Thread

Posted on 10/19/15 at 11:08 pm to
Posted by ChemE in the OP
The Flats
Member since Apr 2011
6382 posts
Posted on 10/19/15 at 11:08 pm to
Early leans... Maryland, Ga Tech, and USCw.

Posted by Zipfer2022
Member since Nov 2011
3757 posts
Posted on 10/19/15 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

Betting is done via tellers or "writers". You tell them the SIDE NUMBER, not the team, you want to bet.


I went to Vegas for the first time a couple of weeks ago and made this mistake at the Wynn. Felt like a huge newb

Ga Tech is the only side I know I'll be on. I expect the # to rise so holding off for now. Need a bounce back week after I gave half my winnings back Saturday. That Michigan game ...
Posted by rawDAWG333
Knoxville
Member since Nov 2012
1712 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 2:56 am to
UL Lafayette +10

Posted by accnodefense
Trump Fan
Member since Dec 2010
6279 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 11:01 am to
How my model has done on totals this year.

Week 5 was a killer. That was the week the monsoon hit the east coast and pretty much every game went under so my model got killed picking overs.

Posted by Vaquero
Member since Dec 2012
134 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:19 pm to
What's your model say for the UL game tonight acc?
Posted by SystemsGo
Member since Oct 2014
2774 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Where is your model then?


I'm not him, but I tend to lean on S&P+, which has LSU as the 35th best defense. A more realistic number imho. LINK

And that's the thing: doing a model on my own might give me a nice feeling of accomplishment, but it probably wouldn't give me a more predictive way of projecting college football scores. At least not initially.


ETA: I say all of this despite having elaborate plans for a tennis model that does everything but suck your dick on fridays.

ETA2: And I actually still haven't completely ruled out the possibility of some fellatio functionality. Just saying.
This post was edited on 10/20/15 at 12:38 pm
Posted by SystemsGo
Member since Oct 2014
2774 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Yeah I am losing this season because I am not trusting my model enough.

I'll post how its done week by week later when I update the Week 7 results.


You could put it up on predictiontracker.com, and see how it fares.
Posted by accnodefense
Trump Fan
Member since Dec 2010
6279 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

I'm not him, but I tend to lean on S&P+, which has LSU as the 35th best defense. A more realistic number imho. LINK


My issue with S&P+ is that its meant to be a ranking, not a method to predict games against the spread.

My model is far more transparent than S&P+ or FEI which are simply "here is a ranking of teams" with no breakouts or any way to explain how the numbers can be used apart from ranking the teams.
Posted by accnodefense
Trump Fan
Member since Dec 2010
6279 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

What's your model say for the UL game tonight acc?


I can't remember, its at home, but nothing stood out enough for me to bet it. I do know that it picked Arkansas State, however, against a spread of 7. I know the number rose to 10.

I was having more issues last night with the output. For some reason it outputted all the sheets in a low resolution so a lot of info was cut off. I will have to re-run them again tonight.
Posted by rawDAWG333
Knoxville
Member since Nov 2012
1712 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:48 pm to
acc have you posted them for this week yet?
Posted by SystemsGo
Member since Oct 2014
2774 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

My issue with S&P+ is that its meant to be a ranking, not a method to predict games against the spread.


I disagree with this characterization. Predictive value is his guiding light. That's why I like it vis a vis other rankings. Retrodictive rankings are as useless as....well they're pretty useless.
This post was edited on 10/20/15 at 12:52 pm
Posted by SystemsGo
Member since Oct 2014
2774 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:55 pm to
FYI, he's been keeping track of his picks ATS for like 7-8 years. LINK

Posted by SystemsGo
Member since Oct 2014
2774 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

My model is far more transparent than S&P+ or FEI which are simply "here is a ranking of teams" with no breakouts or any way to explain how the numbers can be used apart from ranking the teams


Yeah, fair critique. I don't think Fremeau really cares to disclosse all that's under the hood of his ranking. I think Bill probably would if he could, but he's just really bad at it. Even reading his "study hall" posts is just a painful experience. I have no idea what all his numbers represent.
This post was edited on 10/20/15 at 1:01 pm
Posted by accnodefense
Trump Fan
Member since Dec 2010
6279 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

acc have you posted them for this week yet?


No I am having issues right now. The problem is that it takes about 3 hours to run the sheets, so I just run it and go do other stuff. I came back last night after it was done running to see it outputted in a low resolution. So I will have to run it again when I get home from work.
Posted by accnodefense
Trump Fan
Member since Dec 2010
6279 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Yeah, fair critique. I don't think Fremeau really cares to disclosse all that's under the hood of his ranking. I think Bill probably would if he could, but he's just really bad at it. Even reading his "study hall" posts is just a painful experience. I have no idea what all his numbers represent.


I know exactly how both systems work

My model is closer to FEI's, as my model only uses drive data, like FEI's. Connelly's uses play-by-play data, which is really hard to come by at an affordable price. So I have to go with drive data, but there is nothing wrong with that at all. Play-by-play data would only help my model's Method 5, but even then that is trivial.

I have never seen the part of Connelly's blog that shows his ATS picks. It's useful but I wish he would show how his method does against totals, and also how it does against value. If his S&P model says a team will win by 30 points and the spread is 10, that's 20 points of perceived value. If his S&P model says a team will win by 7 points and the spread is 6.5, that's only 0.5 points of perceived value. Does his method do better when his model gives a team more perceived value? That is another thing I calculate with my own methods.
Posted by SystemsGo
Member since Oct 2014
2774 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

I know exactly how both systems work


I understand them conceptually just fine; I just don't like the way Bill presents his 'advanced box scores' or whatever he calls them.

I'm not much of a totals guy, but I suppose the more information the better.
Posted by SystemsGo
Member since Oct 2014
2774 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Does his method do better when his model gives a team more perceived value


I couldn't tell you this year, or even the last several years. I used to follow it pretty closely back in the day and I did feel like there was a correlation between how his picks fared and how much they deviated from the spreads. But that's what you'd expect. If his algorithm is projecting margins that are just a point or two or three off from the actual lines, his winning percentage isn't gonna deviate much from fiddy fiddy.
Posted by cpsilo1
Member since Oct 2006
31 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 3:21 pm to
I highly recommend Lagasse's Stadium at the Palazzo. It will be $50/person to sit down, but that $50 goes towards food and drink.

A good strategy would be to go with a big group and split the tables up. Let's say you had 2 tables of 5....so the restaurant will get $500 guaranteed from y'all. You can keep asking the waitress how much left you have to spend. In their mind, you're one party, but once you hit the quota; tell her to split the bills b/w the tables.

Make sure everyone at your table knows the plan before. Only order a few beers and apps, this way you're out the door only spending about $38 after tip and the other table will foot the rest.

It will be all good, b/c each table is only paying for what they consumed.

Oh, and if you go to the Westgate; ask for Chona (she also goes by Concepcion) - she's the best cocktail waitress in Vegas.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
14693 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

I highly recommend Lagasse's Stadium at the Palazzo. It will be $50/person to sit down, but that $50 goes towards food and drink.



i was there for the georgia/bama game and it was $100/person minimum(before tax and tip). either way, highly recommended.
Posted by PeteRose
Hall of Fame
Member since Aug 2014
17896 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:48 pm to
17-26-1(disgusting)

Ark St -7
Ark St -1/2 1Q
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram