Started By
Message

re: Notre Dame changes the rules of CFP to get auto playoff bid if ranked in top 12

Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:13 am to
Posted by Cell of Awareness
Member since Jan 2024
1550 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:13 am to
quote:

USC was the cowards that weaseled out of the rivalry, not Notre Dame.


DId USC offer to play week 0? Yes or no?

They did not weasel out. They did not want to play in the middle of their conference schedule. The cult at South Bend does not have to worry about a conferemce schedule which anyone with an IQ above room temperature realizes is far tougher when traditional foes are at you week after week..
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
17383 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:26 am to
I am tired of Notre Dame being treated as a one team conference. It has been that way for decades.
Posted by Cell of Awareness
Member since Jan 2024
1550 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Fact is, Notre Dame was forced into being an independent (Big Ten/Michigan/Yost blocked them because they were anti-Catholic and anti-immigrant). They made their identity by going coast to coast and playing anyone. That stuck and here we are.


Once Fielding Yost stepped down at Michigan, they could have joined at any point. That is 86 years ago.

Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
5645 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:49 am to
quote:

I don't understand how one school could get such a massive advantage over everyone else like that


Money. Thats it.

They bring a large fan base and viewership along with them. This sport is nothing more than a financial engine. There’s no school pride or educational aspect. The last little bit that was remaining a few years ago has been beaten out of it. They will do anything and everything for more money now.
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36594 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:16 am to
quote:

DId USC offer to play week 0? Yes or no?


For the 80th time, you can’t just snap your fingers and play week 0. If neither team plays at Hawaii during the season, the game has to be international. It can’t just be “let’s move it from week 13 to week 0 in the Coliseum.” It was not a legitimate, feasible offer that late in the game (which USC knew), when the assumption had been it would be played in LA. With a few years of planning, sure, it could’ve been arranged.

quote:

They did not weasel out. They did not want to play in the middle of their conference schedule.


The game would’ve been played at the end of the year (not middle) in LA, as it has been for a century. The fact that it’s always been played in October in South Bend has been an ND courtesy to USC so they didn’t have to deal with the weather. I’m sure ND would be happy to have it in South Bend at the end of the year instead.

quote:

The cult at South Bend does not have to worry about a conferemce schedule which anyone with an IQ above room temperature realizes is far tougher when traditional foes are at you week after week..


Yes, Rutgers, Maryland, Minnesota and Northwestern are more traditional USC opponents than ND.

Look, ND immediately replaced USC with a road game against a similar-caliber opponent to USC. If USC replaces ND with a week 0 game against a similar-caliber opponent to ND, then I’ll grant you that ND takes at least half of the blame, fair?

I even concede USC’s schedule is tougher in 2026 and they travel more now than they used to. It was still their choice / they were the drivers to end it, not ND.
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36594 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:27 am to
Shifting gears back to the main OP (USC discussion is more fitting for the other “shite on ND thread”, which seem to occur weekly now)… one thing I should’ve mentioned in my first-page reply but didn’t was that this MOU was agreed to last spring.

That doesn’t change its effect for 2026 of course, but I think it would change the optics. This wasn’t an ND “response” to this season, and I really don’t think anyone would care if coincidentally ND hadn’t finished #11 this year.

And again, they will be either top-10 or #13 or lower next year. Zero chance the committee ranks them at #11 or 12 next year. In fact, OP if you see this, I will donate $250 to a charity of your choice if in any future season a higher-ranked team is knocked out of an at-large spot in favor of ND due to this rule. Feel free to bump this thread if that happens.
Posted by GentleJackJones
Member since Mar 2019
5149 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:56 am to
quote:

DId USC offer to play week 0? Yes or no? They did not weasel out. They did not want to play in the middle of their conference schedule. The cult at South Bend does not have to worry about a conferemce schedule which anyone with an IQ above room temperature realizes is far tougher when traditional foes are at you week after week..


quote:

For the 80th time, you can’t just snap your fingers and play week 0. If neither team plays at Hawaii during the season, the game has to be international. It can’t just be “let’s move it from week 13 to week 0 in the Coliseum.” It was not a legitimate, feasible offer that late in the game (which USC knew), when the assumption had been it would be played in LA. With a few years of planning, sure, it could’ve been arranged.


This. Regular Joe fan does not realize the nuances to playing week 0. That’s some “excuse” USC and its coward HC and AD weaseled up. Your coach also tried to weasel out of the LSU game. You’re cowards. You’re a once great, now beta program that weaseled out of the ND series because (1) You want the easiest path to the CFB Playoffs as possible; and (2) You were tired of getting your arse kicked by Notre Dame.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram