- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Not targeting
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:42 pm
WTH is a defender supposed to do? Terrible.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:44 pm to SloaneRanger
It’s targeting I guess but it shouldn’t be. If he leads with the crown I get it, but that what the are taught to do.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:44 pm to moock blackjack
If thats targeting then we need flags or 2 hand touch.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:45 pm to SloaneRanger
You act like this is the first you have seen of this. It's been called targeting 70% of the time for at least the last 5 years in hits exactly like this. It's a joke but that's just how it is now.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:45 pm to moock blackjack
He led with the shoulder, kept his feet on the ground during the hit, and the runner lowered his head
bullshite call
bullshite call
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:45 pm to moock blackjack
He turned his whole body and led with the shoulder. Only hit in the vicinity of the head because of what the receiver did.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:46 pm to SloaneRanger
Per the rule, 100% targeting
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:46 pm to moock blackjack
They have to take into account that the ball carrier is being pulled down. It’s ridiculous to assume a defensive player can be going for a legal hit, the ball carrier called, trips, gets tackled and it’s the defensive players fault.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:47 pm to moock blackjack
Why are you white knighting for Ole Miss so hard tonight?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:47 pm to moock blackjack
quote:
100% targeting
I feel for people who grew up with this attitude and just accept it because they never knew different.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:48 pm to udtiger
quote:
Per the rule, 100% targeting
What is he supposed to do? Get trucked?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:49 pm to SloaneRanger
It’s 100% targeting by the definition.
It’s a terrible rule and I really wish they would get rid of this rule.
It’s a terrible rule and I really wish they would get rid of this rule.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:49 pm to Oilfieldbiology
The hit by #15 was the exact same hit, it’s just that the WR didn’t get tackled just before the contact.
Stupid rule.
Stupid rule.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:51 pm to St Augustine
quote:
What is he supposed to do? Get trucked?
I feel like I've said this about a player on my team 5 times in the last 3 years. It's bullshite but that is how they seem to call it now more times then not, even after reviewing it..so I'm assuming that is how they want them to call it going by the rule they have made?
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 8:52 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:51 pm to St Augustine
Forcible contact to head or neck.
Launching doesn't mean you necessarily leave your feet.
Refs determined OM player was defenseless
Launching doesn't mean you necessarily leave your feet.
Refs determined OM player was defenseless
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:52 pm to udtiger
Stockton got murdered even worse than the OM receiver 
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:54 pm to Sun God
quote:
Stockton got murdered even worse than the OM receiver
Why they didn't call it on that play I will never know.
Mind you
<<<<<<< fricking hates targeting
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:55 pm to udtiger
Oh yeah, I don’t believe either deserved a penalty
Just a straight retarded rule that is called with absolutely zero consistency
Just a straight retarded rule that is called with absolutely zero consistency
Popular
Back to top

6






