- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:19 am to lsupride87
and the number or % of kids that are holdbacks has nothing to do with success?
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:19 am to lsupride87
Just saying the fact that the two most successful programs in the state are K-12 isn't an accident.
ETA: OCS is K-12 as well btw.
ETA: OCS is K-12 as well btw.
This post was edited on 8/8/13 at 10:21 am
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:19 am to JJ27
quote:Curtis and WM both put in more time, effort, and money into their football programs than anyone else. Do you think that could be a reason why they are the most successful?
So everyone else is lazy? That's why Curtis has won so many titles?
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:20 am to choupiquesushi
quote:I have heard this line about so many schools it is ridiculous. Whatever school is winning at the time is holding back players
and the number or % of kids that are holdbacks has nothing to do with success?
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:21 am to lsupride87
quote:
Curtis and WM both put in more time, effort, and money into their football programs than anyone else. Do you think that could be a reason why they are the most successful?
considering state rules on what PUBLIC schools can do... WM probably puts in a little less time than curtis does... just saying..
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:21 am to lsupride87
they don't play public school politics... they don't keep coaches around who are 1-19 against the Catholic schools for example
This post was edited on 8/8/13 at 10:24 am
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:21 am to JJ27
quote:That is life. In all aspects of life some people will have advantages. I can think of an advantage public schools have, it is free.
Just saying the fact that the two most successful programs in the state are K-12 isn't an accident.
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:22 am to choupiquesushi
quote:All schools have the same limitations per the LHSAA
considering state rules on what PUBLIC schools can do... WM probably puts in a little less time than curtis does... just saying..
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:22 am to lsupride87
quote:
quote:
and the number or % of kids that are holdbacks has nothing to do with success?
I have heard this line about so many schools it is ridiculous. Whatever school is winning at the time is holding back players
PBS and ND don't do it...
but news paper articles prove it for one...
and for two others.. when ALL of their kids on 13 year old baseball team are in the 6th grade.. that 's a little odd.
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:23 am to lsupride87
quote:
quote:
considering state rules on what PUBLIC schools can do... WM probably puts in a little less time than curtis does... just saying..
All schools have the same limitations per the LHSAA
on paper.. yes... but in practice no....
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:24 am to choupiquesushi
Yeah WM actually practices very little time wise, or at least we did when I was there. Always half shell and typically 90 minutes or so with 45 or so in the film room prior. Colleges actually came in to study how efficient practices were conducted.
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:25 am to JJ27
quote:
Yeah WM actually practices very little time wise, or at least we did when I was there. Always half shell and typically 90 minutes or so with 45 or so in the film room prior. Colleges actually came in to study how efficient practices were conducted.
one of the most efficient practices I have seen in any sport....
course 21 coaches helps
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:25 am to choupiquesushi
I wasn't going to put the secret out there.
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:25 am to JJ27
quote:Another point made. Yall seperated yourselves by having such good coaching even colleges wanted to check it out. But most will just say, WM recruits and holds players back. Its unfair........
Colleges actually came in to study how efficient practices were conducted.
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:29 am to lsupride87
quote:
Yep, and the funny thing about Curtis is, they arent winning due to better and bigger athletes.
wut
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:31 am to brewhan davey
quote:Go look at the college players Curtis produces. They arent even top 10 in louisna for producing big time D1 recruits. This year and last year may be a different story
wut
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:33 am to lsupride87
You also mentioned
So there are schools out there that also have 280 lb OL across the board?
quote:
I have watched Curits play plenty of public schools with twice the size and speed, and Curtis blows them off the field.
So there are schools out there that also have 280 lb OL across the board?
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:36 am to brewhan davey
quote:I have no clue what Curtis has this year, but i have watched them play teams such as St. Aug, Karr, etc over the years who had twice the size and D1 prosepects, and Curits dominated them with x's and o's
So there are schools out there that also have 280 lb OL across the board?
Posted on 8/8/13 at 10:37 am to lsupride87
I wouldn't say twice the size... maybe D1 prospects.
But, Curtis' teams always have their fair share of behemoths.
But, Curtis' teams always have their fair share of behemoths.
Page 18 of 21
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News