Started By
Message

re: NCAA closer to letting Division I athletes bet on pro sports

Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:38 am to
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37400 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Whataboutism. This is irrelevant to the topic.


As you just talk about people breaking laws.

Whiny arse bitch and fricking retarded too
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51222 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Whiny arse bitch and fricking retarded too


You are one angry lady today. Pop a tampon in and go watch some daytime TV.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
29254 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Whiny arse bitch and fricking retarded too


Another irrelevant comment to the topic at hand…

But damn bro…lay off the roids for a while.

Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
29254 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:50 am to
When people reference him being a shite poster, I thought it was some exaggeration. I guess I’m wrong.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37400 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:59 am to
quote:

When people reference him being a shite poster, I thought it was some exaggeration. I guess I’m wrong.


You referenced whataboutism when I made a direct comparison to point out the absurdity of your logic…. And then proceeded to concoct a whataboutism is the very next sentence.

I didn’t make you be a moron, you chose to do that yourself and now you’re whining for being called out about it
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51222 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

When people reference him being a shite poster, I thought it was some exaggeration. I guess I’m wrong.


Oh he’s a terrible poster. Apparently a huge whiny pussy too.

Who knew?
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37400 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Oh he’s a terrible poster. Apparently a huge whiny pussy too. Who knew?


You’re referencing people breaking the law to support your argument against this new rule
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51222 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

You’re referencing people breaking the law to support your argument against this new rule


Where did I argue against the new rule? I simply stated that legalizing gambling for college athletes isn’t going to change much.

The ones who will gamble were already gambling and most of them that do it will continue to do so through illegal means because there is almost no visibility.

Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37400 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

The ones who will gamble were already gambling and most of them that do it will continue to do so through illegal means because there is almost no visibility.


You’ve got no fricking clue if either of these statements are correct
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51222 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

You’ve got no fricking clue if either of these statements are correct




You have no clue if any of the nonsense you’ve posted in the thread is correct either.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37400 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

You have no clue if any of the nonsense you’ve posted in the thread is correct either.


Well considering they’re all just my opinion, I guess you’re technically correct.

But I haven’t posted any “data” as a fact like you. More proof of your retardism
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51222 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

But I haven’t posted any “data” as a fact like you. More proof of your retardism


What data have I posted?
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37400 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

What data have I posted?


quote:

The ones who will gamble were already gambling and most of them that do it will continue to do so through illegal means because there is almost no visibility.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51222 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:10 pm to
That’s not data scooter. That’s an opinion.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37400 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

That’s not data scooter. That’s an opinion.


You presented it as a fact. Learn to write in more than a kindergarten level
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51222 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

You presented it as a fact. Learn to write in more than a kindergarten level


Only if you’re unintelligent and don’t know what data is.

Like you
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37400 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Only if you’re unintelligent and don’t know what data is.


Data is empirical evidence. You said the ones that want to gamble already do, stated as fact. For you to know that, there would HAVE to be data to back that up. You’re just making shite up with no idea if it’s true or not
Posted by Toxic Dude
Member since Oct 2025
98 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:17 pm to
Just a matter of time until classes are optional
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51222 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Data is empirical evidence. You said the ones that want to gamble already do, stated as fact. For you to know that, there would HAVE to be data to back that up. You’re just making shite up with no idea if it’s true or not


quote:

Most of them aren’t going to bet.

There’s zero logical reason to let legal adults bet legally on sports. Other than it aggrieves some dude in Livingston Parish who’s never going to hear about it again after this article


Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37400 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

As of 2025, approximately 31% of adults under 30 in the U.S. have bet on sports in the past year, according to a Pew Research Center survey.


It’s almost like I can back up what I say.

Unless you want to say this particular subset of the population is going to deviate from the averages by nearly double. I’ll concede we don’t have numbers for this specific subset, but with no contrary evidence what I said is factually true
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 12:25 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram