
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/4/26 at 2:20 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I haven't followed this, but wouldn't it make sense to make the salary cap materially above the highest payroll currently and just know going forward you can't get above that? They'll eventually all catch up to that threshold, some sooner than others, but it might be several years before even teams like the Dodgers do.
It kicks the can, but everyone knows it's coming and can plan ahead.
It kicks the can, but everyone knows it's coming and can plan ahead.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 2:22 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
They’re labor. You’re labor.
Yes, they are extremely well-compensated labor.
What makes them so special?
Posted on 11/4/26 at 2:39 pm to Cosmo
quote:
MLB basically just trying to copy NBA model but apparently that just isnt fair to the MLBPA
If that is true, the NBA follows a 90/10 model with a soft cap (luxury tax). Meaning teams have to spend at least 90% of the cap each season. If the big complaint by players are owners not spending, not sure how this wouldn't benefit them.
If you force "small market" teams to spend 90% of the cap, more players are making more money overall (in theory).
Posted on 11/4/26 at 3:16 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Just let us watch the games. They have made watching your team or really any baseball damn near impossible to find. I’d start with getting rid of blackouts.

Popular
Back to top

1






