- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:04 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
Cotton is not the deal's headliner
really?
Montess? I know nothing about him. They don't send Puig to Oakland do they?
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:05 pm to danfraz
If you used Twitter you'd know all about montas
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:06 pm to Lester Earl
Montas, grant Holmes, & cotton
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:09 pm to Lester Earl
What an unbelievably awful trade. Like holy arse fricking, titty tapping, shite
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:10 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Montas, grant Holmes, & cotton
Thats a nice fricking haul.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:10 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
If you used Twitter you'd know all about montas
cute but I don't have a need to know about him right now in my life. Just following the trades that are relevant
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:11 pm to reddman
quote:
Thats a nice fricking haul.
So by the reaction of the board Oakland made a killing?
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:12 pm to lsu31always
The only way this is salvaged, for the dodgers, if this turns out to be some weird three way deal like two winters ago. But as it stands right now, this is a horrific trade
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:16 pm to danfraz
quote:I don't know much about those prospects, but the Dodgers also do a good job of rounding out their roster with Reddick and Hill.
So by the reaction of the board Oakland made a killing?
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:23 pm to The Sad Banana
Redick & Hill are good MLB players. The prospects are good too, but was a fair price for those 2 guys
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:24 pm to Lester Earl
My problem is that they're rentals and this dodger team is, realistically, not a legit WS contender without kershaw. We just picked up two rentals for no real reason
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:24 pm to Lester Earl
Rosenthal: Cubs talking to Angels about Joe Smith. Other opportunities, as well.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:25 pm to WestCoastAg
They could re-sign them
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:27 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
this dodger team is, realistically, not a legit WS contender without kershaw. We just picked up two rentals for no real reason
I never buy this mentality anymore. With the WC game anything is possible, NO ONE thought the Mets were WS contenders either. And I doubt if the Dodgers are done with trades
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:28 pm to Lester Earl
They could definitely resign them. They are also no longer eligible for the qualifying offer, per Robert Murray.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:28 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
They made a slaughter
Dont agree with this. Seems like a fair deal to me.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:35 pm to WestCoastAg
I have no problem moving Cotton, but Holmes and Montas are future studs. Montas would be in the bigs right now if he hadn't been injured. He could be a future closer. Holmes is probably two years away, but he's a solid #2 guy in the rotation. Not very happy with this trade.
Popular
Back to top


0








