Started By
Message

MLB Teams hitting and runs graphed.

Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:45 am
Posted by DiamondReb
Tupelo, MS
Member since Jan 2014
886 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:45 am
Posted by harry coleman beast
Left Field
Member since Aug 2008
52210 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:46 am to
Lots of room to improve for Miami
Posted by LST
Member since Jan 2007
16316 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:46 am to
Marlins.
Posted by CurDog
Member since Jan 2007
28082 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:46 am to
poor marlins
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166145 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:46 am to
we need a payroll tangent.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166145 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Marlins.


holy shite, took me 2 minutes to find them .
Posted by The White Lobster
Member since Jul 2009
16764 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:49 am to
I will post this graph next time someone says higher batting average results in more runs.

thanks
Posted by DiamondReb
Tupelo, MS
Member since Jan 2014
886 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:49 am to
The Marlins are like the fat kid that can't keep up with the rest of the pack during a hike.
Posted by goldenbadger08
Sorting Out MSB BS Since 2011
Member since Oct 2011
37900 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:51 am to
So why the hell can't the Rockies score runs?
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:56 am to
Where would the Rockies be if they didn't have the big advantage?
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65774 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 11:57 am to
Coors Field is tough to score runs in. Something to do with the altitude and them not having any good hitters.









Sarcasm.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65774 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Where would the Rockies be if they didn't have the big advantage?


Still high, they're a good hitting team home and away.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82010 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

I will post this graph next time someone says higher batting average results in more runs.

thanks


well there's a fairly linear correlation
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136795 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 12:17 pm to
team salary to runs would be more interesting

LOL CUBS
Posted by The White Lobster
Member since Jul 2009
16764 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 12:26 pm to
well sure but it's pretty loose.

there's a lot of stats that would show better correlation
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31061 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 12:36 pm to
I don't really think many are arguing that.

Decent enough correlation, but yeah. I feel confident that OPS would have a higher r.
Posted by Ronnie Hot Finger
Metairie
Member since May 2013
316 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 12:41 pm to
So what you're saying is more hits = more runs? Wouldn't have guessed...

Side note edit:
quote:

Recruiting Wish List: 1) Bo Scarbrough 2) Terrence Alexander 3) Trey Quinn 4) Jacory Washington 5) Andrew Williams

This post was edited on 1/22/14 at 12:43 pm
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 1:00 pm to
Cubs. Mathematically eliminated already.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71347 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Where would the Rockies be if they didn't have the big advantage?



Fwiw, baseball messes with their balls which takes away a lot of the advantage.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 7:17 pm to
the marlins
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram