- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MLB: Off-Season Thread
Posted on 1/25/25 at 6:36 pm to Willie Stroker
Posted on 1/25/25 at 6:36 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
Since they only pay California income taxes for half their games, I wonder if players can request contracts that pay most of their salary for road games.
Wouldn’t it be more in CA taxes since they divisional road games at San Diego and San Francisco plus the 81 home games in LA
Posted on 1/25/25 at 6:42 pm to medtiger
My question is how does a salary cap help for deferred money?
Posted on 1/26/25 at 5:00 am to medtiger
They all have general wealth, why don’t they just do what the dodgers do ?
Posted on 1/26/25 at 7:34 am to Stamps74
The issue with the Dodgers model is that if your bet doesn't pay off, ie. you don't win a World Series or generate enough revenue, than you won't be able to pay out the player in however many years, or it will be a terrible ROI.
Imagine if Ohtani immediately suffered a career-ending injury, it's a remote possibility, but if it happened, his entire deal is guaranteed per my understanding. A lot of teams don't want to take that kind of risk. It's something only 5-10 teams could do, and only the Mets and the Dodgers would have the balls to do IMO.
Imagine if Ohtani immediately suffered a career-ending injury, it's a remote possibility, but if it happened, his entire deal is guaranteed per my understanding. A lot of teams don't want to take that kind of risk. It's something only 5-10 teams could do, and only the Mets and the Dodgers would have the balls to do IMO.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 8:37 am to AldousSnow26
Again, feel like people don't understand how deferred money works. People don't just sit for 10 years, twiddling their thumbs, and go oh shite! once the deferments kick in
You have to actually show baseball you have the money to cover them, then they go into an account, and teams then can literally invest that money and earn profit on it
Teams typically make money on deferred salaries
You have to actually show baseball you have the money to cover them, then they go into an account, and teams then can literally invest that money and earn profit on it
Teams typically make money on deferred salaries
Posted on 1/26/25 at 8:42 am to Stamps74
quote:
They all have general wealth, why don’t they just do what the dodgers do ?
I don't pretend to know which billionaires are richer than the others and who can really afford to spend stupid and which can't.
I do know the Dodgers tv deal is by far the best in baseball and it's not even close, meanwhile half the MLB teams have been hamstrung by servers that they've contracted to games for them have gone bankrupt and can't pay them.
That's a significant thing and the money the Donders get from their contract give the organization HUGE advantage over any and every team in the league. While Cohen can spend his own money and maybe a couple of other owners too have to actual personal wealth to spend like the Dodgers none have that 25 year tv contract that pours in the money annually anwhere close to what the Dodgers have.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 8:59 am to WestCoastAg
So how much money did the Dodgers toss into an escrow account to cover his entire contract? It must be prohibitive or it would be common practice.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:31 am to AldousSnow26
My understanding is that because of what happened with the DBacks in the 2000s, that baseball literally requires all of the deffered money to be put into an escrow account upfront to prove that they can actually afford it and that they won't run into solvency issues paying it out like Arizona did
Deferred salaries are incredibly common. Just not that amount
Deferred salaries are incredibly common. Just not that amount
Posted on 1/26/25 at 10:59 am to WestCoastAg
I think the logic behind that makes sense, but I feel like there are never disagreements over a club wanting a deferred contract and a player not wanting one, at least publicly.
There are probably pros and cons on both the club and player side for their use, which come down to a case-by-case basis.
There are probably pros and cons on both the club and player side for their use, which come down to a case-by-case basis.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 11:13 am to AldousSnow26
players are pro deferrments because it drives salaries up in total value. owners are pro deferments because it stretches their payments out and they can then let that money actually work for them
both sides generally like them but what happened in ohtanis case is uinque.since he has so much money coming from other places. doubt we will ever see someone agree to defer 97% of their deal ever again
while i typically have the belief that every single organization in baseball massively downplays their revenues and could absolutely afford 200+mm contracts on the regular, putting up 680mm upfront is obviously something that a number of organizations couldnt do so....i do kinda get the consternation of the ohtani deal
maybe something gets put in place going forward where deferrals are allowed but instead of a total salary cap, somethign that is a complete non starter for the players and would absolutely 100% bring the entire 2027 season into jeopardy, we have a deferred salary cap
both sides generally like them but what happened in ohtanis case is uinque.since he has so much money coming from other places. doubt we will ever see someone agree to defer 97% of their deal ever again
while i typically have the belief that every single organization in baseball massively downplays their revenues and could absolutely afford 200+mm contracts on the regular, putting up 680mm upfront is obviously something that a number of organizations couldnt do so....i do kinda get the consternation of the ohtani deal
maybe something gets put in place going forward where deferrals are allowed but instead of a total salary cap, somethign that is a complete non starter for the players and would absolutely 100% bring the entire 2027 season into jeopardy, we have a deferred salary cap
Posted on 1/26/25 at 4:39 pm to Falco
Does Presley trade free up resources for Bregman
Posted on 2/2/25 at 3:52 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Fay Vincent, who took over as Major League Baseball's commissioner in 1989 and navigated the league through the earthquake-disrupted Bay Area World Series, has died at the age of 86, MLB announced Sunday.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 6:10 pm to CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
I honestly didn't know that he was still alive
Popular
Back to top

0





