- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mike Postle "Cheating Allegations" in Poker
Posted on 10/9/19 at 4:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/9/19 at 4:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yeah, was an interesting listen. I haven’t followed the story too close but was aware of it.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 4:47 pm to danilo
quote:
How much has he won?
About $250K over the course of a year and a half, I believe.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 5:22 pm to ATLsuTiger
quote:
About $250K over the course of a year and a half, I believe.
When they included mix game streams including Pot Limit Omaha and Pot Limit Omaha Hi Lo and a couple of missed Holdem streams it was up to +$326,000 with 77 of 87 winning session in 2018 and 2019
Playing $1-$3 and $5-$5
Posted on 10/9/19 at 5:35 pm to rolltide32
quote:
77 of 87 winning session in 2018 and 2019
That's not even close to possible.

This guy is a greedy fricking moron for thinking he could make this win rate look legit.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 5:41 pm to ATLsuTiger
quote:
This guy is a greedy fricking moron for thinking he could make this win rate look legit.
Probably has 1 or 2 guys he's splitting it with helping on the inside to feed him the cards so he just kept pushing the envelope.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 5:44 pm to rolltide32
Oh there are definitely announcers and/or other casino employees involved in this scam.
There is no other way that he could have justified this kind of win rate without the help of other people making him out to be poker Jesus.
There is no other way that he could have justified this kind of win rate without the help of other people making him out to be poker Jesus.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 5:46 pm to ATLsuTiger
quote:
people making him out to be poker Jesus.
I hear that may of been part of a PR stunt so players can come and play against a poker god.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 5:51 pm to PeteRose
That's 100% what it was. Why the casino looks so bad and may end up in serious trouble (lawsuits and regulators don't like fraud)
Posted on 10/9/19 at 5:53 pm to ATLsuTiger
quote:Wait, are you saying a win percentage of 89% isn’t possible in poker?
That's not even close to possible.

Posted on 10/9/19 at 6:20 pm to Scruffy
The win rate combined with the way in which he wins the hands. He makes nearly flawless moves over these sessions, especially on the river. Go watch some of the hands on YouTube; it's insane!
LINK
VPIP tracks the percentage of hands in which a particular player voluntarily puts money into the pot preflop. VPIP increases when a player could fold but instead commits money to the pot preflop. This includes limping (merely calling the big blind), calling, and raising.
Posting the small and big blinds does not influence the VPIP statistic. These actions are involuntary and therefore give no useful information on player tendencies.
BB/100 = The number of big blinds you win per 100 hands.
The higher your VPIP is the lower your BB/100 should be...generally. But wouldn't you play more hands if you knew what everyone was holding?
LINK
quote:
But Duncan Palamourdas, a math professor and UCLA extension instructor with specialization in poker education and author of the forthcoming book, Why Alex beats Bobbie?“, told Casino.org that, according to reports from analyst Doug Polk, Postle “never lost a game in something like 11 sessions, booking around $60k. From a purely mathematical standpoint, this is already unlikely.”
Palamourdas explained that “a very winning poker player has, at best, a 70 percent chance of booking a win in these kind of games. Even then, a player of that caliber would only have less than a 2 percent chance of booking 11 wins in a row. Much less, if we take into account that all [of] Postle’s wins were pretty significant for the stakes he was playing.”
The allegations have charged Postle somehow knew “the hole-cards of his opponents,” Palamourdas said. “Apparently, there has been no formal proof, but only substantial circumstantial evidence.”
Palamourdas noted, too, how analyst Joey Ingram claimed Postle “pretty much played each river nearly perfectly, and only lost when he failed to bluff a weak hand out of the pot.”
“There are way more rivers than there are sessions, so even a player who can play, say, 90 percent of those rivers correctly — already a huge stretch, but let’s pretend it is the case, for the sake of the argument — has less than a 0.003 percent chance of playing perfectly over 100 different rivers. That’s 33,333 to 1 against,” Palamourdas said.
“Let’s also not forget that this calculation assumes a player who can make the right river decision 9/10 times,” he added. “If Mike’s skill is more pragmatic, these odds drop substantially.”

VPIP tracks the percentage of hands in which a particular player voluntarily puts money into the pot preflop. VPIP increases when a player could fold but instead commits money to the pot preflop. This includes limping (merely calling the big blind), calling, and raising.
Posting the small and big blinds does not influence the VPIP statistic. These actions are involuntary and therefore give no useful information on player tendencies.
BB/100 = The number of big blinds you win per 100 hands.
The higher your VPIP is the lower your BB/100 should be...generally. But wouldn't you play more hands if you knew what everyone was holding?
Posted on 10/9/19 at 6:22 pm to Scruffy
The most damning evidence to me are the numerous times a player’s cards weren’t read by the RFID reader and it’s Postle telling the players instead of the dealer. I don’t know why none of the players caught that and were like ‘how the frick do you know my cards didn’t get read?’
Posted on 10/9/19 at 6:22 pm to ATLsuTiger
Yeah but it looks like what really screwed him and finally flipped the switch for everybody else were the hands where he had the clear advantage but always knew to fold because his opponent pulled a rabbit out of their arse.
This post was edited on 10/9/19 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 10/9/19 at 6:31 pm to lsu xman
Some give different tests for different groups but most just change up the order if it’s all scantron
Posted on 10/9/19 at 7:21 pm to gobuxgo5
Saw a video by gumpenstein or something like that, who pinpointed the transition from phone on the rail to phone in the lap on July 18, 2018 at the 2:01 mark. His win rate exponentially increased after that time.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 7:57 pm to Ric Flair
Yep! I linked that on page 3. It’s so obvious he’s cheating. Who puts their phone under their crotch like that? Come’on man!
Posted on 10/10/19 at 10:52 am to ATLsuTiger
quote:
Mike Postle, Stones Parties Hit With $10M Lawsuit
quote:
Stones Gambling Hall, Stones Tournament Director Justin Kuraitis (lead photo right) and a number of other unnamed defendants have been hit with a $10 million lawsuit, according to a publicly posted court document from Mac VerStandig, attorney for the plaintiffs.
LINK
Posted on 10/10/19 at 11:23 am to lsu xman
Posted on 10/10/19 at 11:29 am to lsu xman
i posted teh complaint on the previous page
poker player Kelly Minkin is one of the attorneys
poker player Kelly Minkin is one of the attorneys
Posted on 10/10/19 at 12:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
poker player Kelly Minkin is one of the attorneys
Lol
Popular
Back to top
