- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/22/09 at 1:11 pm to LSUTANGERINE
military to prevent war is one thing... but alot of these pro-war individuals also are pro-life (its like an oxymoron). i agree with you. people get offended by vicks actions because its dogs, "mans best friend."
Its interesting though on a side note, how so many Americans take better care of their dogs than themselves (health and nutrition wise)
Its interesting though on a side note, how so many Americans take better care of their dogs than themselves (health and nutrition wise)
Posted on 4/22/09 at 1:14 pm to tubucoco
quote:
like I said, I get that what he did was wrong, but some you guys take the shite too far, this guy is a high profile athlete that a lot of people are jealous of and they want to see him burn in hell to satisfy there on warped agendas, so they use the dog abuse as a frickin excuse for it, the man paid the price, was found guilty, did his time, and will pay the price for the rest of his life. his image will be forever tarnished, it will hurt him in future endorsement deals and everything, so move the frick on.
i can say with 100% confidence that this thread was not started out of anything but disgust for what I saw on the ESPN360 story. I knew about what he did obviously but didn't know about the detail in which he preformed excuting his dogs. I am not the least bit jealous or envious of that sick frick, especially seeing as he is in prison right now and I am not. That being said you are correct, his reputation and image will forever bee tarnished with this and talking about what he did is part of what goes along with that. Oh and I feel just awful for him that his endorcement deals won't ever be the same.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 1:15 pm to TigerEyez
quote:
Whats the difference between what vick did and people that kill livestock... Its accepted in U.S. to electrocute Cows. A cow gives you milk. doesn't it? I dont think what vick did is good by the way, he should have been punished.
there is a huge difference and it has already been discussed
Posted on 4/22/09 at 1:17 pm to Sophandros
quote:
Every volunteer at a women's and children's homeless shelter? I take it that the answer to that question is NO.
ever volunteer at a animal shelter? apples and oranges.
i didn't know children and women were pit vs other women and children to fight to the death.
This post was edited on 4/22/09 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 4/22/09 at 1:29 pm to The Ramp
quote:
i didn't know children and women were pit vs other women and children to fight to the death.
When the comparison between humans being treated poorly came up (particularly the homeless), someone said that they can help themselves. Well, HOMELESS AND HUNGRY CHILDREN CAN NOT.
I'm willing to wager that the majority of the people who who are overreacting about Vick (and that's what it is, an overreaction) don't give a frick about homelessness and hunger in our society. Now THAT is fricked up.
Yes, dogfighting is wrong, but he man did his time and is about to be released. Get over it.
People are acting like dogfighting is society's worst evil, when it's far, far from it.
Oh, by the way, I've fostered animals (including a pitbull that my girlfriend rescued from a home where we suspected he was being trained to fight) before. Does that count?
This post was edited on 4/22/09 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 4/22/09 at 1:37 pm to Sophandros
quote:
Well, HOMELESS AND HUNGRY CHILDREN CAN NOT.
and who should we punish? society? give me a break. they may be victims but no one is treating them poorly. everyone has a hard luck story but no one is bred to kill.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 1:44 pm to Sophandros
quote:
I'm willing to wager that the majority of the people who who are overreacting about Vick (and that's what it is, an overreaction)
An overreaction? Wow
Posted on 4/22/09 at 2:03 pm to TEXASTIGER22
quote:
An overreaction? Wow
What's funny is that it sounds like Sophrandos and I are probably two of the biggest animal lovers in this thread. My girlfriend and I have a rescue dog as well as our purebred. If we didn't adopt him he was going to be euthanized.
I love dogs and yet I think people overreacted to what Vick did - especially compared to all the other ills that are performed on animals every day.
What Vick did was horrible, but it was part of his culture. I don't think he viewed it as murder or turture, just like you don't view it as supporting murder or torture when you order veal at an Italian restaurant. Because it's your CULTURE that says it's okay. I'm pretty sure that once Vick was forced to step back and see his acts through other people's eyes he was like "damn - I'm gonna get skewered". Just like if everytime you ordered Veal you had to watch a YouTube video on the life of a veal calf you'd probably think "damn, I'm a selfish prick".
By the way, Clinton Portis' comments are just so indicative of the way that young southern black guys from rural areas view dog fighting. It completely IS a cultural thing. Portis' comments that "it's just dogs - damn" is the way that he was raised.
This post was edited on 4/22/09 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 4/22/09 at 2:05 pm to TEXASTIGER22
quote:
An overreaction? Wow
So you think that people saying that Vick should, essentially, be killed for what he did isn't an overreaction?
Or are you saying that, even though he served his time and paid his debt to society, he shouldn't be allowed to pursue his career isn't an overreaction?
YES, in my opinion, much of the rhetoric surrounding Vick is and EXTREME overreaction. In fact, the fact that this has gotten more airtime on non-sports television than homelessness and hunger COMBINED over the last couple of years should embarrass us as a society. The fact that NO ONE complains about the dogs who are killed ANNUALLY at the Iditarod and other sled races speaks volumes, not to mention the lack of concern over the treatment of cattle, pigs, and chickens. I'm not even going to get into the hunters who go to "hunting grounds" where they put a trail of food out for the deer to just walk up and get gunned down for "sport"...
Yes, this is an overreaction. He committed a crime. He served his time. But many of you act as if he participated in the Holocaust, for the sake of frick.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 2:08 pm to AlejandroInHouston
No, Alejandro, it's NOT a part of his culture. I've never been to a dog fight in my life, for example. The only killing that my father's dogs participated in was when he was hunting with my grandfather. I have some rural family members, and they have never participated in dog fighting.
Yeah, you can take ONE person's quote, but there is some truth to what Portis said. That truth is this: Humans >>>> Dogs. And I have two dogs.
Yeah, you can take ONE person's quote, but there is some truth to what Portis said. That truth is this: Humans >>>> Dogs. And I have two dogs.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 3:01 pm to Sophandros
quote:
That truth is this: Humans >>>> Dogs.
Unless you know any gladiators, then that has nothing to do with this arguement. You act as if there are no rules against the killing of humans. What does homeless/hungry people have to do with fighting dogs? One is a crime and the other is a tragedy.
and being a part of one's "culture", doesn't make it right or acceptable.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 3:08 pm to The Ramp
quote:
Unless you know any gladiators, then that has nothing to do with this arguement. You act as if there are no rules against the killing of humans. What does homeless/hungry people have to do with fighting dogs? One is a crime and the other is a tragedy.
Let me type slowly for you.
My issue here is with the level of outrage and press coverage. There is little to no outrage or press coverage over horrific things that happen to humans in this country daily. In fact, the people who seem the most upset with Vick probably wouldn't even donate to a homeless shelter.
Don't complain about his inhumane treatment of those dogs while ignoring the inhumane treatment of humans all around you.
Regarding "culture", I agree with you. What Vick did was wrong, no matter what culture they're coming from. Alejandro is way off the mark with that argument.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 3:10 pm to AlejandroInHouston
quote:
What's funny is that it sounds like Sophrandos and I are probably two of the biggest animal lovers in this thread. My girlfriend and I have a rescue dog as well as our purebred. If we didn't adopt him he was going to be euthanized.
we also have two katrina Dogs who were going to be put down as well as a pure bred bulldog so don't try to play the "we are the biggest animal lovers" card just because you went to the pound. I can not see how anyone who has dogs in their family could ever stick up for this piece of shite.
quote:
What Vick did was horrible, but it was part of his culture. I don't think he viewed it as murder or turture, just like you don't view it as supporting murder or torture when you order veal at an Italian restaurant. Because it's your CULTURE that says it's okay.
That is a bullshite cop out. First of all i think torturing any living thing is god awful. I do not condone that on any level but to say that every piece of chicken or beef that has been pushed through the grocery store or local restaurant has been tortured before it was killed is stupid and ignorant. I also pointed out before that I have never ordered veal or had it because of the nature it is made and i never will. Any "culture" who thinks that torturing dogs who lose you money is ok is severly fricked up in the head and should be punished for their actions. It is NEVER ok to put dogs through what he did with electricution, hanging, body slamming until they were dead etc... It is also not ok to do this to cows, horses, chickens etc... but they are on a different level than Dogs in American culture. This is like saying dogs being tortured and people being tortured are equal when they are clearly not. Dogs are household pets that become apart of peoples family much more in our society than cows, chickens or whatever so they are viewed as more important to most of America. The "it was his culture" excuse is so wrong on so many levels.
quote:.
I'm pretty sure that once Vick was forced to step back and see his acts through other people's eyes he was like "damn - I'm gonna get skewered". Just like if everytime you ordered Veal you had to watch a YouTube video on the life of a veal calf you'd probably think "damn, I'm a selfish prick".
And he probably didn't have remorse for his actions because he is demented. Once agains I will say I have never eaten veal but there is no comparrison between the two. When baby cows are tortured for veal it is wrong in my opinion but at least you can say they are being used as food. What was Vicks excuse? He enjoyed watching these dogs suffer so much he invested a ton of money to buy a house and all of the equiptment he could to fund it. He went out of his way to buy the pool he would throw the dogs in to eletricute them. He did not shoot the dogs after they lost a fight for him, he body slammed them time after time until they were dead. What normal person does this? If I see a video of a baby cow being tortured I feel compassion for the calf even though I have never had a pet cow or had any emotional attachment to that cow because I am a normal human being who feels sad in these situations. I feel even more compassion for dogs when I see them being tortured and bred to kill each other because I have three dogs of my own who I love and care for very much. This guy took pleasure in seeing these dogs suffer which is so fricked up to me I can not explain it.
quote:
By the way, Clinton Portis' comments are just so indicative of the way that young southern black guys from rural areas view dog fighting. It completely IS a cultural thing. Portis' comments that "it's just dogs - damn" is the way that he was raised.
So we should just write it off and ask them to please stop? Give me a fricking break. It is not a normal cultural thing to watch something suffer. Again. if it is then that culture is extremely fricked up.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 3:13 pm to The Easter Bunny
[quote]I agree what he did was wrong, but there are a lot of things that are swept under the rug in the NFL, such as domestic violence, DUIs, etc. [/q
and you dont think Vick hasnt done any of those things? the dude is a fricking criminal enouhg said.
and you dont think Vick hasnt done any of those things? the dude is a fricking criminal enouhg said.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 3:22 pm to Sophandros
quote:
Let me type slowly for you.
ditto
quote:
My issue here is with the level of outrage and press coverage. There is little to no outrage or press coverage over horrific things that happen to humans in this country daily. In fact, the people who seem the most upset with Vick probably wouldn't even donate to a homeless shelter.
You do realize WHO Vick is? again, if you're not fighting homeless humans to the death than homelessness has nothing to do with this thread.
quote:
Don't complain about his inhumane treatment of those dogs while ignoring the inhumane treatment of humans all around you.
Inhumane? No one person is treating homeless people inhumanely. It's a tragedy not a crime. They are misfortunate but not maliciously bred to kill for entertainment. You need another example.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 3:23 pm to Sophandros
quote:
There is little to no outrage or press coverage over horrific things that happen to humans in this country daily.
Have you seen a show that comes on nightly called the News? Murder rape etc.. are covered much more frequently than dog fighting rings. As a matter of fact this is the only case I can think of that with dog fighting that has been covered to this extent. To take this a step further the coverage is for the person and not the issue. You don't see any of the other guys Vick was with being talked about on ESPN all the time so this issue is not being overhyped the person who did it is. That however is something that comes along with the fame and glamour of being a celebrity. If you do something shity it is going to blow up in your face. Same thing happened when OJ killed his wife and her lover and when Tyson was thrown in jail for rape. These stories always get overdone when someone famous is involved which sucks for the celebrity but they should think about that before they kill, rape or torture.
quote:
Don't complain about his inhumane treatment of those dogs while ignoring the inhumane treatment of humans all around you.
Who is ignoring this? I haven't read one person say that humans and dogs are on the same level.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 3:25 pm to The Ramp
Both are injustices, yet only one gets press.
I'm not talking about the fighting of dogs (you're obsessing over one highly emotional aspect of the case). I'm talking about inhumane treatment of people and animals. And yes, homelessness IS relevant to this discussion because many people have shown more emotion and compassion for these dogs than they have for the people whom they have stepped over and IGNORED all around them.
THAT, my friend, is a damned shame.
I'm not talking about the fighting of dogs (you're obsessing over one highly emotional aspect of the case). I'm talking about inhumane treatment of people and animals. And yes, homelessness IS relevant to this discussion because many people have shown more emotion and compassion for these dogs than they have for the people whom they have stepped over and IGNORED all around them.
THAT, my friend, is a damned shame.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 3:31 pm to Sophandros
quote:
THAT, my friend, is a damned shame.
try jogging on the levee every day. it might change your mind.
i think the domestic abuse analogy was better
This post was edited on 4/22/09 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 4/22/09 at 3:31 pm to Sophandros
quote:
So you think that people saying that Vick should, essentially, be killed for what he did isn't an overreaction?
Or are you saying that, even though he served his time and paid his debt to society, he shouldn't be allowed to pursue his career isn't an overreaction?
I never said he should be killed. I don't agree with that obviously and if the law says it is ok for him to play football again then it is ok, I just hope personally that no team does. If the Texans, my favorite NFL team, would pick him up I would stop watching. I would not tell others they should stop watching but that would be my personal decision out of my disgust for that man.
quote:
YES, in my opinion, much of the rhetoric surrounding Vick is and EXTREME overreaction. In fact, the fact that this has gotten more airtime on non-sports television than homelessness and hunger COMBINED over the last couple of years should embarrass us as a society. The fact that NO ONE complains about the dogs who are killed ANNUALLY at the Iditarod and other sled races speaks volumes, not to mention the lack of concern over the treatment of cattle, pigs, and chickens. I'm not even going to get into the hunters who go to "hunting grounds" where they put a trail of food out for the deer to just walk up and get gunned down for "sport"...
I don't hunt but you really need to stop comparing dogs to Chicken, Cows, Deer, or any other animal for that matter. "man's best friend" is more important to people in American society than any of these animals and are seen as such. Same reason you don't want people to compare dogs to humans.
Popular
Back to top



1


