Started By
Message

re: Just how impressive was Dan Marino's 1984 campaign?

Posted on 8/19/18 at 5:50 pm to
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Montana always had a defense to back him up

only 4 times in his career did Marino play with a top ten defense, two of those where his first two years in the league.


The dude threw 44 TDs one season and his team didn't make the playoffs, in what universe does that ever happen unless he plays with a shitty D?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 6:00 pm to
quote:


I think we are still arguing the point that Montana dragged an average team to the Conf championship. when Montana had a below average year



Stats don’t tell the whole story
Posted by tankyank13
NOLA
Member since Nov 2012
8292 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

Stats don’t tell the whole story


correct, way too many different variables in football that contribute to success and failure, but you refuse to measure Marino in the same manner
This post was edited on 8/19/18 at 6:15 pm
Posted by OliverQueen81
In The South
Member since Oct 2015
10805 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 6:24 pm to
Marino had the quickest release too.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

but you refuse to measure Marino in the same manner


That’s not true at all

All I ever said was that when you compare the best of the best of the best to ever play the game you’re going to have to split hairs to separate them and while it’s not completely fair, team success does factor into it considering nobody on the field has a more direct impact on every single play more than the quarterbacks. When you compare Marino’s accomplishments to others in that class he comes up short.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10338 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 6:39 pm to
Greatest arm in the history of the game. He was fun to watch and deserved a SB ring but sadly never got one. That 1984 season was legendary at the time. It took 24 years for another QB to do it and it also took rule changes to make it happen.

It would be like a QB throwing for 5700yds today.
This post was edited on 8/19/18 at 6:44 pm
Posted by rilesrick
Member since Mar 2015
6704 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 6:40 pm to
He and Elway were the best pure throwers of their time.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

All I ever said was that when you compare the best of the best of the best to ever play the game you’re going to have to split hairs to separate them and while it’s not completely fair, team success does factor into it considering nobody on the field has a more direct impact on every single play more than the quarterbacks. When you compare Marino’s accomplishments to others in that class he comes up short.


Ive always maintained that the 3 most important components of a football team are the QB, offensive line and defensive line. Without those 3, running backs and receivers don't get the ball, quarterbacks can't get enough time to throw, running backs have no room to run, linebackers can't make an impact on the game, and cornerbacks would be obsolete because an offense would gain 5 yards a running play almost every down.
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Marino > Montana. Imagine if Montana had to deal with the atrocious defenses and zero running game like Marino had to for his entire career. There's no way in hell he would have finished his career with a winning percentage above .600 like Marino did.


you are what's wrong with sports' discussions on the internet ... and probably american in general ...

you say this, which has some merit: Imagine if Montana had to deal with the atrocious defenses and zero running game like Marino had to for his entire career.

then you say this, which has zero merit: There's no way in hell he would have finished his career with a winning percentage above .600 like Marino did.
This post was edited on 8/19/18 at 6:54 pm
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

When you compare Marino’s accomplishments to others in that class he comes up short.


For the record, who are the people in this class you're referring to?
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140859 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

pure throwers


WTF does this mean? Is that like the naturally accurate stupidity some folks like to discuss?
This post was edited on 8/19/18 at 7:12 pm
Posted by tankyank13
NOLA
Member since Nov 2012
8292 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

WTF does this mean?


No one got the ball from one point to the other better. No part of the field was not in play
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140859 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 7:32 pm to
Then say they have a strong arm. Because nobody is natural thrower. They practice it to get every field. Just like accuracy is a practiced thing
Posted by tankyank13
NOLA
Member since Nov 2012
8292 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

Then say they have a strong arm.


Just an example; Jamarcus Russell had a strong arm, doesn't make him a pure passer
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140859 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 7:39 pm to
There’s no such thing as a pure passer.

I’ve never heard of that term except from people on here and simpleton media types. Ask any QBC OC HC etc. they’ll laugh at you successful passers work hard and don’t just rely on “pure” whatever
This post was edited on 8/19/18 at 7:41 pm
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
40909 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 7:55 pm to
quote:


Marino did not have the same mental makeup to elevate his game in the biggest moments



You've always been full of shite but this may have outdone all your other brainless drivel.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44206 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

If Montana was simply a product of a system, you would think that system could have been replicated by other teams around the NFL.


Maybe it's because the designer of the system, Bill Walsh, wasn't on those other teams.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 8:04 pm to
quote:


For the record, who are the people in this class you're referring to?


Montana, Unitas, Brady, Marino, Elway, Manning
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39414 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 9:02 pm to
Marino in the draft

This is a classic. "They got to the Super Bowl with a David Woodley at quarterback and they must figure if they can get it out of David Woodley, they think they can get it out of Dan Marino."

I don't know the full story but there were serious questions about Marino's mental makeup leading up to the draft and all the picks he threw his last year at Pitt.

That's why he dropped in the draft.

And there was that drug rumor. Not that he was some hardcore user but a partier at Pitt...this was 1982 and the NFL was just waking up to recreational drugs and it freaked out conservative teams.

The rumor was pervasive and convincing enough that former Steelers coach Chuck Noll admitted in a 1992 Associated Press interview to passing on Marino specifically because of the rumor.


BTW, Marino was the 1st player selected in the USFL draft that year by the Los Angeles Express. Who would then sign Steve Young a year later.
Posted by Mr. Elvert
Dallas
Member since Oct 2012
15328 posts
Posted on 8/19/18 at 9:03 pm to
Better than Mondale’s
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram