- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I'll take peak Curry over peak Lebron
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:30 am to PortCityTiger24
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:30 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:If we're using that argument, then yeah, it fricking is
Taking the back to back MVP is just dumb!!
The other guy has won back to back twice, and 4 out of 5 years. fricking Christ 
0
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:35 am to boXerrumble
quote:lebron really wasn't this remarkable player in 2007. Yes, he was a top player in the NBA but he wasn't top 5. That was when he was still a Russell Westbrook level of unreliable three point shooter. His historic game 5 really glosses over the fact that he was merely a good player that year and into the playoffs as well. So yea, put this year's steph curry on that Cleveland team and give him that years eastern conference and he probably gets them to the finals
You think Curry takes 2007 Cleveland to the Finals?
quote:meh. They are both equally responsible for their 2nd half come back in game 6 and steph still had over 30 points and hit six threes
If it wasn't for Thompson, the Warriors would've lost this series.
This post was edited on 5/31/16 at 12:37 am
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:37 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
but he wasn't top 5
Must...not...bite
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:40 am to WestCoastAg
quote:Averaged 27/6/7 in the regular season and 25/8/8 in the playoffs. He was most likely a top 5 player.
lebron really wasn't this remarkable player in 2007. Yes, he was a top player in the NBA but he wasn't top 5
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:40 am to WicKed WayZ
Wasn't tip 20 in ORtg. Was barely top 15 in DRtg. Was barely top 10 in ws/48. And was just starting to come into his own as a facilitator. He really wasn't
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:41 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
Yes, he was a top player in the NBA but he wasn't top 5.
LOL
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:41 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:because he was literally the entire cav team. The analytics point to him being a fringe top 10 player in 2007
Averaged 27/6/7 in the regular season and 25/8/8 in the playoffs. He was most likely a top 5 player.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:42 am to boXerrumble
quote:
Wasn't tip 20 in ORtg. Was barely top 15 in DRtg. Was barely top 10 in ws/48. And was just starting to come into his own as a facilitator. He really wasn't
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:42 am to WestCoastAg
quote:He was playing with dogshit man. He was top 5. If he could have, I'm sure he would have been more selective and played like the Lebron that we know of now.
Wasn't tip 20 in ORtg. Was barely top 15 in DRtg. Was barely top 10 in ws/48. And was just starting to come into his own as a facilitator. He really wasn't
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:44 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
If you want to say LeBron is the more complete player, then I'll agree. I'll take Steph though...
so by your own admission, you are are fricking moron...
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:44 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
The analytics point to him being a fringe top 10 player in 2007
Delonte West
Donyell Marshall
Big Z
Andy Verajao
Eric Snow
I mean shite man, your numbers aren't gonna look good with that cast
This post was edited on 5/31/16 at 12:45 am
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:44 am to WestCoastAg
quote:Which doesn't really help analytics, I'd guess.
because he was literally the entire cav team.
Who were the 5 players who were better? Hell, you might be right.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:45 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:and that also led to his raw output being greater because he was the entire team. You can't have it both ways. You can't point to his raw output and go "see! He's this top 5 player" and then go "his per 100 numbers and other metrics don't really matter because he played on a poor team"
He was playing with dogshit man
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:45 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
If it wasn't for Thompson, the Warriors would've lost this series.
meh. They are both equally responsible for their 2nd half come back in game 6 and steph still had over 30 points and hit six threes
Equally responsible?
Without Klay going unconscious there would have been no game 7 tonight
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:45 am to chRxis
quote:Do you even devastation?
so by your own admission, you are are fricking moron...
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:45 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:duncan, nash, KG, dwade, kobe
Who were the 5 players who were better? Hell, you might be right.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:46 am to WestCoastAg
Fair enough
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:46 am to jg8623
quote:without steph putting the Warriors on his back in the mid 3rd quarter, OKC puts the game in the bag by the start of the 4th
Without Klay going unconscious there would have been no game 7 tonight
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:46 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
duncan, nash, KG, dwade, kobe
Lebron over Nash, IMO.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:48 am to WestCoastAg
He was way better than KG
Page 6 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News