- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/6/26 at 3:43 pm to UnoMe
quote:
After an Eastern Conference Sweep, NBA finals sweep vs MSB greatest 7’3 pussy ever to play? Come on now
none of this is impressive in the least bit in today's NBA.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 3:47 pm to littleavery1948
No. The spurs don’t seem to care after beating the thunder.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 4:53 pm to justaniceguy
Knicks are up 2 Games to Nun
Posted on 6/6/26 at 9:20 pm to littleavery1948
quote:
2026 Hawks >>> 2001 Blazers 2026 Sixers < 2001 Kings (by a small margin) 2026 Cavs < 2001 Spurs 2026 Spurs >>>>> 2001 Sixers
This is fricking stupid talk holy shite how old are you? 15?
Not a single one of the Eastern playoff teams this year besides the Knicks even pushes the 01 Kings to 6 games, they all get swept or gentlemen swept easily.
fricking 2026 Sixers better than the 01 Kings!? You are retarded, of the highest order
This post was edited on 6/6/26 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 6/6/26 at 9:22 pm to littleavery1948
quote:
2026 Hawks >>> 2001 Blazers
Posted on 6/6/26 at 9:42 pm to CONNECTICUTTIGER
“Fo, Fo, and Fo” Moses Malone.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 10:51 pm to littleavery1948
How old are you, 7?
Ever heard of recency bias?
You are a child. Go back to watching cartoons.
I think sports are too real for you, and you lack maturity/perspective.
Ever heard of recency bias?
You are a child. Go back to watching cartoons.
I think sports are too real for you, and you lack maturity/perspective.
Posted on 6/7/26 at 2:17 pm to TideSaint
quote:
No.
The Lakers run in 2001 was better.
Only lost one game.
Are we talking great run or great team? That Lakers team was obviously a great team, but how it is a great run when they were supposed to dominate?
Not a lot of people outside of NY were picking the Knicks to win the championship, much less in a sweep (if that happens), against a team that people had already crowned.
This post was edited on 6/7/26 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 6/7/26 at 2:19 pm to TideSaint
quote:
No. The Lakers run in 2001 was better. Only lost one game.
This. That team was the best I’ve ever seen. We’re blowing out playoff teams left and right.
Posted on 6/7/26 at 6:49 pm to Gifman
No better than 5th, and even that requires you respecting the Spurs at a way higher level than they ever merited.
Look, I'm no fan of the 2001 Lakers-- but losing one game in the playoffs is a ton is still more impressive than losing two, no matter how close the remainder of their games were-- they won.
The 2016-17 Warriors, though, is the right answer.
Look, I'm no fan of the 2001 Lakers-- but losing one game in the playoffs is a ton is still more impressive than losing two, no matter how close the remainder of their games were-- they won.
The 2016-17 Warriors, though, is the right answer.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News