- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Herbstreit and cohort don’t even know the basic rules
Posted on 11/3/24 at 8:18 am to Sailor Sam
Posted on 11/3/24 at 8:18 am to Sailor Sam
Right. Thanks
Posted on 11/4/24 at 7:24 am to LSUStar
Did we get confirmation on the rule?
Posted on 11/4/24 at 10:42 am to 62zip
quote:
That is incorrect.
Why is there a penalty for 5 men in the backfield? You fricking moron

Posted on 11/4/24 at 10:44 am to poncho villa
We are all morons at times
Simply put. You can have as many as you want on the line
I truly don’t know how Kirk was confused. Goal line sneaks often have everyone on the line

Simply put. You can have as many as you want on the line
I truly don’t know how Kirk was confused. Goal line sneaks often have everyone on the line
This post was edited on 11/4/24 at 10:46 am
Posted on 11/4/24 at 10:52 am to Salviati
quote:
I'm pretty sure you're wrong.
I believe the rule focuses on how many players can be in the backfield , it does NOT look at how many players can be on the line. Four maximum for backfield, NOT seven maximum for offensive line.
um, he's saying the same thing you are saying.
Herbie was the one saying you couldn't have more than 7 on the line. which of course is incorrect.
Posted on 11/4/24 at 10:59 am to doubleb
I was shocked to hear that on the broadcast. But, this is a man that cries on TV, so...
Posted on 11/4/24 at 2:10 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
um, he's saying the same thing you are saying.
Herbie was the one saying you couldn't have more than 7 on the line. which of course is incorrect.
quote:No, I'm saying that you can have more than 7 players on the line, but you can't have more than 4 players in the backfield.
I was shocked to hear that on the broadcast. But, this is a man that cries on TV, so...
Posted on 11/4/24 at 10:04 pm to Salviati
Summoning choupiquesushi for clarification.
Posted on 11/4/24 at 11:12 pm to poncho villa
quote:
Why is there a penalty for 5 men in the backfield? You fricking moron
frick you, dumbass.
There is no requirement that there be 7 on the LOS and hasn't been for years. Just because you can't have more than 4 in the backfield doesn't mean you are required to have 7 on the LOS. If the offense has 10 on the field, they can have 4 in the backfield and have only 6 on the LOS and still be legal. That's the reason the rule was changed.
Before calling anyone a moron, you should really make sure you're right, dickbreath.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 10:10 am to 62zip
quote:
There is no requirement that there be 7 on the LOS and hasn't been for years. Just because you can't have more than 4 in the backfield doesn't mean you are required to have 7 on the LOS. If the offense has 10 on the field, they can have 4 in the backfield and have only 6 on the LOS and still be legal. That's the reason the rule was changed.
THERE IS A REQUIRMENT YOU CAN'T HAVE 5 MEN IN THE BACKFIELD. THAT IS OFF LINE.
LET ME DO MATH FOR YOU
Illegal =11-5 = 6
Legal = 11-4= ???
You can have 10,9,8,7 on the line but you can't only have 6. It's a fricking penalty if you do.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 1:46 pm to doubleb
Well, was this ‘play’ in favor of the chiefs or against?
Posted on 11/5/24 at 3:29 pm to poncho villa
quote:
THERE IS A REQUIRMENT YOU CAN'T HAVE 5 MEN IN THE BACKFIELD. THAT IS OFF LINE.
LET ME DO MATH FOR YOU
Illegal =11-5 = 6
Legal = 11-4= ???
The rule is no more than 4 in the backfield. There is no rule rule for maximum/minimum people.
Having 10 people on the field is not against the rules. Therefore, 10 men on the field 4 could be in the backfield with only 6 on the line and the formation would be legal.
quote:
but you can't only have 6. It's a fricking penalty if you do.
Please link the penalty.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 3:34 pm to doubleb
This thread demonstrates that football has too many rules and is over regulated.
Herbie is great at his job and got confused about the rule.
Someone started a thread about it and it is full of people yelling at each other about which rules are and are not correct.

Herbie is great at his job and got confused about the rule.
Someone started a thread about it and it is full of people yelling at each other about which rules are and are not correct.

Posted on 11/5/24 at 4:55 pm to poncho villa
quote:
THERE IS A REQUIRMENT YOU CAN'T HAVE 5 MEN IN THE BACKFIELD. THAT IS OFF LINE.
LET ME DO MATH FOR YOU
Illegal =11-5 = 6
Legal = 11-4= ???
You can have 10,9,8,7 on the line but you can't only have 6. It's a fricking penalty if you do.
Your reading comprehension is piss poor.
I explained to you how it's possible but you're obviously too stupid to comprehend what I said.
Here is a link to the rule book. Please tell us what page states that there must be seven on the line scrimmage. Thanks in advance.
NCAA Football Rule Book
Posted on 11/5/24 at 4:56 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
The rule is no more than 4 in the backfield. There is no rule rule for maximum/minimum people.
Having 10 people on the field is not against the rules. Therefore, 10 men on the field 4 could be in the backfield with only 6 on the line and the formation would be legal.
He's obviously not bright enough to grasp that.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:00 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
Having 10 people on the field is not against the rules. Therefore, 10 men on the field 4 could be in the backfield with only 6 on the line and the formation would be legal.
That's a fricking retarded arse statement. Yes I guess you can have 1 person snapping and 1 person at QB and still play.
You are correct. Jesus I'm SO DUMB

Posted on 11/5/24 at 11:48 pm to poncho villa
quote:
You are correct. Jesus I'm SO DUMB
Let me know when you find the rule.
And yes, you're apparently dumb as frick..
Just take you L and move on.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 8:31 am to 62zip
You have to have 7 on the line of scrimmage if you are playing normal fricking football and have 11 players on the field. Saying that you can have 6 if a player forgets to run out on the field is a dumb argument but yes you're correct you can play football with one person on the field.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 9:05 am to poncho villa
quote:
You have to have 7 on the line of scrimmage if you are playing normal fricking football and have 11 players on the field. Saying that you can have 6 if a player forgets to run out on the field is a dumb argument but yes you're correct you can play football with one person on the field
Apparently you really are that stupid. There is no rule that a team must have seven players on the LOS and I would challenge you to prove otherwise.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 9:42 am to 62zip
quote:
Apparently you really are that stupid. There is no rule that a team must have seven players on the LOS and I would challenge you to prove otherwise.
If you have 11 men on the field, you can't have more than 4 in the backfield meaning you have to have 7 on the los. this isn't rocket surgery. The rule doesn't explicitly state you MUST have 7 on the line but if you have 11 on the field then you have must have 7. We are arguing back and forth about the verbiage of the rule.
Back to top
