- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: hearing rumors FSU & Clem to SEC, PAC raiding Big 12, big 4 Conferences forming
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:38 pm to LSUownsBammers
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:38 pm to LSUownsBammers
quote:
LSUownsBammers
1st post huh? So you're an Alter. I get it.
Don't care? Then why take the time to read and post on my threads Retard? You contradict yourself...
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:39 pm to LSUownsBammers
quote:
LSUownsBammers
Number of Posts: 1
fuuark this guy came out swinging.
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:39 pm to ToesOnTheNose213
quote:
USC actually has more international students (mostly from Asia) than any university in the country. USC defnitely has an good reputation in Asia.
Not doubting what you're saying. There is definitely an 'asian' connection with the California schools. Just saying that "Stanford" and "Berkely" usually have a higher brand name regardless of what is reality.
quote:
Correct. But the Asian countries love their baseball and Olympic sports, and the PAC usually performs well in those sports (not so much baseball this year, but you get what I'm saying). So yeah, there could be a lot of Asian eyes watching a PAC-12 network.
Yep, and I alluded to that.
quote:
BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY: I am in no way, shape, or form agreeing with DucksFly about anything discussed here, or about anything in life.
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:39 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
I was offered UO
D1 scolly
quote:
I spend thousands in Traveling supporting UO where they play
did you go to the rose bowl this year, where yall got out traveled by a school over twice as far away
quote:
Now go burn a couch or something..
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:41 pm to rocket31
Since TrollflyinthePAC jerks off to how many people responds to his topics everyone should just ignore the troll.
You were offered a scholarship to kill yourself.
quote:
I was offered UO
You were offered a scholarship to kill yourself.
This post was edited on 5/10/12 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:45 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
You are simply Retarded. Now go burn a couch or something...
And once again when he can't make a valid point he resorts to e-bullying and name calling.
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:49 pm to VABuckeye
*yawn...
Surely you can do better then that?
Surely you can do better then that?
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:56 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Surely you can do better then that?
You haven't tried to refute one fact I've posted in the last couple of pages. As far as I'm concerned it's game, set and match.
Look. This is an interesting topic. But when you cloud it with conjecture and have no basis in fact to back up anything you're stating you lose all credibility. Which you've done in spades.
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:59 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
I hate China as much as any American. But from what my Banker Friends tell me, Singapore right now is the place to be. But right now China is taking over even more so then Singapore and is BOOMING and is where all the money is shifting to. China = the new money center. Putting down China's wealth, right now, is foolish if you know Banking or know what you are talking about...
Most banker friends I know agree that you either want to be in New York, London, or Tokyo, and if you're anywhere else then you aren't playing in the big leagues.
China is not the new big money center, they still trade nearly all of their stocks in those 3 cities. They have a lot of amassed wealth because of dirt cheap labor bordering on slavery working for nationalized companies, but the real economies are the ones that are buying their bargain basement products despite poor quality and materials (remember the lead paint in children's toys and the Chinese drywall?). They are however being smart with their wealth and putting it into T-bonds of other countries that will pay them off in the long run and they are investing in infrastructure like bridges and dams, unlike the Arab nations. However, it will take them a century or two at this pace to have enough infrastructure to support a billion people across 3500 miles in east to west distance and over 3.7 million square miles. Of course, by that point they will have at least 2 billion people, and so they may still have 80% of their population living in abject poverty.
Posted on 5/10/12 at 4:10 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
You haven't tried to refute one fact I've posted in the last couple of pages. As far as I'm concerned it's game, set and match.
I will let you pretend for a moment...
Why don't you # your points you would like to challenge me on, as I never noticed you. And if serious, I will challenge back your points...Now don't just shotgun blast me with a hundred of them. List just a few points, I can respond, and we can go from there...If serious...
1)?
2)?
3)?
Posted on 5/10/12 at 4:16 pm to TIGERSandFROGS
quote:
China is not the new big money center, they still trade nearly all of their stocks in those 3 cities. They have a lot of amassed wealth because of dirt cheap labor bordering on slavery working for nationalized companies, but the real economies are the ones that are buying their bargain basement products despite poor quality and materials (remember the lead paint in children's toys and the Chinese drywall?). They are however being smart with their wealth and putting it into T-bonds of other countries that will pay them off in the long run and they are investing in infrastructure like bridges and dams, unlike the Arab nations. However, it will take them a century or two at this pace to have enough infrastructure to support a billion people across 3500 miles in east to west distance and over 3.7 million square miles. Of course, by that point they will have at least 2 billion people, and so they may still have 80% of their population living in abject poverty.
I never said China is currently the Big money center right this second. Actually it is Singapore for Asia right now. But Western Bankers from Europe, North America have moved in masses to Singapore positioning themselves to move to China once the flow switches to them. And they tell me it is starting to and will be down the road. Personally, I detest China as much as any American. But this is what my friends tell me, who live over there in Asia...
Posted on 5/10/12 at 4:16 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Now go burn a couch or something...
Posted on 5/10/12 at 4:20 pm to DucksflyinPAC
Well then. Here you go. Prove these points. Good luck with it.
quote:
1) Not to mention, currently the most rich
2) In the PAC, we are like Ivy league Schools
3) And we control the Countries first and most famous of bowls
4) The PAC is the most Stable
Posted on 5/10/12 at 4:27 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
I never said China is currently the Big money center
You didn't?
DucksflyinPAC
quote:
China = the new money center.
You're unbelievably stupid. How are you operating a computer right now?
Posted on 5/10/12 at 4:38 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
I never brought up Oregon in that list. But since you do, watch this and read all the comments in the youtube comments of kids wishing they could go there.
Thank you for admitting you're a professional troll with no life. You probably go on every youtube video about Oregon analyzing all the comments. If you don't agree with them you turn on your super troll powers. Same thing with the ESPN comment section. You go through every comment on the ESPN Pac-12 blog to put in your two cents like it's your god given duty. You put too much into the internet Mr. no life troll. Why do you get so anal when someone disagrees with you? ITS THE INTERNET!
How sad is it that a 35 year old dude argues with teenagers and college kids on an internet forum? Go have relations with your wife or something. Or does she prefer to be cuckolded by BBC while you videotape?
This post was edited on 5/10/12 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 5/10/12 at 4:59 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
1) Not to mention, currently the most rich
2) In the PAC, we are like Ivy league Schools
3) And we control the Countries first and most famous of bowls
4) The PAC is the most Stable
Ok, No problem.
1)It is a fact that at this second in time, the PAC-12 has the largest TV Contract written. It it set to begin this summer, but the contract was already written a long time ago and is currently the most wealthy of all Conferences. This fact cannot in any way be disputed as I have spelled it out. It may be true that in time, the SEC may overtake us within a year, but that is to be argued of the intents and plans of such Conferences where they plan to be 2 years out or such... But right now, this moment in time, the PAC-12 has very well secured the most wealthy of TV media deals. FACT!
2)Stanford has been ranked #3 or #4 in the Nation and is Strongly considered to be a rare Ivy league School but yet existing in D-1 and participating in D-1 sports. It is the only one of it's kind in that way with blending of Academics and College Sports to the highest of levels. Just recently Stanford won the Directors cup, a culmination of points, being #1 for all Athletic Programs in D-1. I may not call us the very best Conference because the Ivy league comes up. But we are like them in many ways, but even more then them value and support big time sporting operations. To use that phrase was not my own idea. It is others who have compared us to them. But for all the D-1 Conferences, we are indeed like them in many ways academically...
3)In PAC country, we have 2 BCS Bowls in the Rose Bowl and Fiesta. But even more special is the fact that we invented the very first Bowl game, the RB, or before that was called, the Tournament East West. The idea of pitting a school from another Conference against each other at seasons end in a final game was something new. And we pit the best. In time, other "Bowls" would copy us. Even the term, "Super Bowl" is borrowed from us. And not too long ago, the RB was the it game, far exceeding the Super Bowl even, in attention and Standing. It is true that we entered into a Contract with the Big Ten quite some time ago. But that is US, inviting THEM to join us. It is our bowl. We just picked them when we did because they were the best Conference to play during then. To debate the RB being the first, and us having Control over our own bowl and event and Stadium is simply a pathetic joke to attempt...
4)Until the changing of the PAC-10 with adding Colorado and Utah and switching it to the PAC-12, our Conference had been the longest in the Country to go without a change in any way. Not to mention our long, Stable History but I can also call it stable for the fact that we have the currently most richest TV Contracts.
Posted on 5/10/12 at 5:11 pm to TIGERSandFROGS
quote:
China = the new money center.
You're unbelievably stupid.
How are you operating a computer right now?
I was simply referring to the fact of the future that not at this exact moment of time are they the center, but are becoming so and will be in the future... So my Western Friends who moved to Singapore and who I met over there are telling me...
From what I can tell, for Asia, Singapore is the Center. Google them if you know not of them. But in the future it will be China. And they are just now starting to creep that way. And my friends are planning on moving to China, from Singapore, when that fully occurs...Ie indeed, China will be the new money center. Do not twist my words...
Posted on 5/10/12 at 5:12 pm to LSUownsBammers
quote:
LSUownsBammers
You have only 4 posts now. Your very first post under this name was directed to me. You are clearly an alter.
Get a life...
Posted on 5/10/12 at 5:15 pm to DucksflyinPAC
Your responses are laughable.
1) Look up research, grants and endowments for major universities and then tell me what conferences bring in the most money. Football money is a drop in the bucket. The PAC 12 is nowhere near the top.
2) You're using one school to say the entire conference is "like Ivy League schools"? It's difficult to even respond to such lunacy.
3) The Rose Bowl is a partnership between the PAC 12 and the Big Ten. Neither conference controls the Rose Bowl.
4) Stability. As a conference it is stable but there are plenty of others in at least as stable a position.
1) Look up research, grants and endowments for major universities and then tell me what conferences bring in the most money. Football money is a drop in the bucket. The PAC 12 is nowhere near the top.
2) You're using one school to say the entire conference is "like Ivy League schools"? It's difficult to even respond to such lunacy.
3) The Rose Bowl is a partnership between the PAC 12 and the Big Ten. Neither conference controls the Rose Bowl.
4) Stability. As a conference it is stable but there are plenty of others in at least as stable a position.
Posted on 5/10/12 at 5:16 pm to DucksflyinPAC
You seem to believe everything your so called friends say. Perhaps it's time you learned and thought on your own.
Popular
Back to top


0


