- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Haslem Suspended 1 Game, Pittman 3
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:13 pm to Tiger1242
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:13 pm to Tiger1242
quote:Not really. Hansborough was unnecessarily rough while making a basketball play on the ball. Haslem just went after Hansboroughs head with no effort to even make it look like a legit play.
they were both flagrant 1.
There was a clear difference between the two. However, like I said, I wouldn't have been upset had Haslem not been suspended.
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:19 pm to WDE24
quote:
There was a clear difference between the two
I struggle to see how you can argue against this. Hansbrough got ball, Haslem didn't come close to attempting to get ball.
quote:
I wouldn't have been upset had Haslem not been suspended.
same here...don't care either way. But I'm glad he did get suspended and just wish the refs would have made the call in-game.
I have no problem with hard fouls and retaliation w/ hard fouls. It happens in every sport, just about every game.
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:20 pm to WDE24
Hansborough's play may have started out as a "play on the ball" but it quickly ceased being that. In my opinion that's a weird distinction to make. Half way through the play he decided he wanted to make serious contact with Wade. The fact that he started out making a play shouldn't negate that half way through the play he stopped just making a play on the ball. You don't accidentally grab someone's face and pull on a follow through.
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:22 pm to WDE24
Haslem shouldn't have been suspended IMHO. His foul was a flagrant 2, but those don't come with an automatic suspension in the next game. His wasn't egregious enough to warrant that given the circumstance, and it's also not his fault that the refs got the call wrong. Upgrade it and fine him
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:26 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:I can agree with this.
His foul was a flagrant 2, but those don't come with an automatic suspension in the next game. His wasn't egregious enough to warrant that given the circumstance, and it's also not his fault that the refs got the call wrong. Upgrade it and fine him
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:47 pm to Toula
So Artest gets 7 games for throwing a blind elbow to a guy standing behind him, but Pittman only gets 3 games for zeroing in on a player flying down the lane and launching himself, elbow first into that player's neck. And to make Pittman's worse, it was premeditated.
Awesome
Awesome
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:48 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
And to make Pittman's worse, it was premeditated.
With a winky face
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:48 pm to jimithing11
Non for TH? But yes for Haslem?
That's BS.
Pittman deserved his.
That's BS.
Pittman deserved his.
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:57 pm to Toula
Should have been 1 for Haslem and 5 for Pittman. Haslem is getting his 1 game because he should have been kicked out of game 5.
Posted on 5/23/12 at 6:58 pm to Toula
LOL at Hansbrough's being upgraded to a flagrant 2.
Posted on 5/23/12 at 7:00 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
LOL at Hansbrough's being upgraded to a flagrant 2.
yea thats stupid too
the refs during the game are the ones that caused all of this mess
Posted on 5/23/12 at 7:41 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
LOL at Hansbrough's being upgraded to a flagrant 2.
did they really? just terrible
Posted on 5/23/12 at 7:45 pm to Tiger1242
quote:
I dk if Haslem got one, Hansborough should get one IMO,
YO sucks
Posted on 5/23/12 at 7:55 pm to tylercsbn9
quote:
Non for TH? But yes for Haslem?
If Haslem made a play for the ball, he was really off.
Posted on 5/23/12 at 7:57 pm to audodger
quote:
Honestly, Hansbrough's foul was probably worse than Haslem's
Honestly, you're wrong.
Posted on 5/23/12 at 8:42 pm to Toula
Pussification of America
Not mad about Pittman's suspension. He knew what he was going to get when he did it.
I think Haslem got the Flagrant, and that should be the end of it. It was a flagrant 2. Why have the flagrant 2 penalty, if it means an auto suspension?
Why not get rid of flagrant 2, and just eject all flagrant fouls with auto suspensions?
Not mad about Pittman's suspension. He knew what he was going to get when he did it.
I think Haslem got the Flagrant, and that should be the end of it. It was a flagrant 2. Why have the flagrant 2 penalty, if it means an auto suspension?
Why not get rid of flagrant 2, and just eject all flagrant fouls with auto suspensions?
This post was edited on 5/23/12 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 5/23/12 at 8:50 pm to Roaad
quote:
Roaad
took you long enough to show up here
Posted on 5/23/12 at 8:56 pm to Roaad
quote:
I think Haslem got the Flagrant, and that should be the end of it. It was a flagrant 2. Why have the flagrant 2 penalty, if it means an auto suspension?
Why not get rid of flagrant 2, and just eject all flagrant fouls with auto suspensions?
because they called it a flagrant 1 on the court when it was clearly a flagrant 2 and he should have been ejected from the game at that point..but he wasn't
I still think its unfair that because the refs screwed up in game now he has to miss the next game, but I still understand where the NBA s coming from in suspending him
I still blame the refs on the court for making all of this happen. If they would have kicked Haslem out of the game when it happened, the Heat would have still rolled and Pittman's penalty probably wouldn't have happened
But the fact that they called Pittman's a flagrant 1 on the court shows you how in "control" the refs on the courts were
Popular
Back to top



3







