Started By
Message

Has Anyone In The Sports Media Ever Heard Of Bart Starr?

Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:42 pm
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:42 pm
He did quarterback the Packers to 5 NFL championships, including two in the Super Bowl era, but I haven't heard his name mentioned in the discussion of all-time greatest quarterbacks over the last couple of weeks. Is he being penalized because three of his championships came in the pre-Super Bowl era? That would be like discounting Joe DiMaggio's or Sandy Koufax's World Series triumphs because they all came in the pre-playoff era. There was pro football before Joe Montana, pro boxing before Mike Tyson and pro basketball before Michael Jordan, despite what today's sports pundits would have you believe. I'm too young to remember seeing a live Packers game during their glory years, but that's what ESPN Classic and Pro-Football-Reference.com are for. Besides being a three-time All-Pro, Starr was a two-time Super Bowl MVP and might have been a three, four or five-time MVP if his entire career had been played in the Super Bowl era. Is there a more underrated quarterback in NFL history than Starr?
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58068 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:44 pm to
it was such a different game then its tough to compare
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29165 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

Is he being penalized because three of his championships came in the pre-Super Bowl era?


Probably.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141926 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:46 pm to
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33939 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:51 pm to
No because he was the ultimate game manager, the original Russell Wilson. A lot of QBs would have looked good with Lombardi as their HC.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71603 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

There was pro football before Joe Montana, pro boxing before Mike Tyson and pro basketball before Michael Jordan, despite what today's sports pundits would have you believe.

I'll give you the football critique but strong no on the boxing and bball angle.
Posted by Chair
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
2168 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:52 pm to
Pre baseball playoffs

Do not equal

Pre super bowl.

Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44840 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:56 pm to
Different era and all that, but his 152/138 career TD/INT ratio probably has something to do with it as well. Those Packer offenses were built around Jim Taylor and Paul Horning and they really only threw when necessary. Nothing wrong with that since it worked for them, but that's one reason why Starr doesn't get mentioned in this conversation.
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36451 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:56 pm to
Dad?
Posted by Big Moe
Chicago
Member since Feb 2013
3989 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

strong no on the boxing


Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

it was such a different game then its tough to compare

Jim Brown, Mike Ditka, Johnny Unitas, Gale Sayers, Dick Butkus and Joe Namath all played in that era, but they don't seem to get short-changed like Starr does. Baseball seems to do a much better job of not letting you forget about the legends of yore than football. Nobody would try to have a discussion about the greatest hitter of all times without mentioning Babe Ruth.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:09 pm to
Kafka beat me to Otto Graham. He won a mere 7 titles. Also, Johnny Unitas won 4 titles. While we're just counting titles, which we shouldn't really do.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Different era and all that, but his 152/138 career TD/INT ratio probably has something to do with it as well. Those Packer offenses were built around Jim Taylor and Paul Horning and they really only threw when necessary. Nothing wrong with that since it worked for them, but that's one reason why Starr doesn't get mentioned in this conversation.

All teams ran the ball more in that era, but that's because the rules back then made it much harder to pass than it is today, not to mention the indoor stadiums, the better playing fields and receiver's gloves which are 3 times stickier than bare skin. The gap between Starr's career passer rating and the average of his era is roughly the same as the gap for Brady and his era.
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 10:13 pm
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

No because he was the ultimate game manager, the original Russell Wilson. A lot of QBs would have looked good with Lombardi as their HC.

Can't you say the same thing about Brady. When Brady was hurt in 2008, Belicheck won 11 games with Brady's backup.
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40518 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:19 pm to
In any objectively measured event (track and field/swimming, etc.), the times of today absolutely dwarf those from 50 years ago. How people can still compare athletes from those eras today is nonsensical.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
52791 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:21 pm to
George Mikan is the GOAT NBA player. DWI.
Posted by MadMaxwell
The Motherland
Member since Jul 2009
4599 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Otto Graham
This. 10 years in the NFL, 10 NFL Championship game appearances, 7 NFL Championships.

If championships are truly the main measuring stick for QBs, there is no discussion, Graham is the GOAT.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44840 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:24 pm to
4 of Otto Graham's championships came in the AAFC before the league folded and the Browns moved into the NFL in 1950.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

In any objectively measured event (track and field/swimming, etc.), the times of today absolutely dwarf those from 50 years ago. How people can still compare athletes from those eras today is nonsensical.

The best athletes of an era would have been among the best athletes of any era. The difference between athletes today and athletes 100 years ago is due to improved medicine, nutrition and training, not evolution. Therefore if Jesse Owens, Jim Thorpe, Mickey Mantle, Jim Brown or Roger Staubach were 25 years old today, they would all be bigger, stronger and faster versions of their original selves..
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

Pre baseball playoffs

Do not equal

Pre super bowl.

Why is that? These era are only two years apart - 1967 vs 1969.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram