Started By
Message

re: ESPN should not refer to the DC football team as the Redskins

Posted on 8/11/13 at 10:19 am to
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Trying waaaaaay too hard.
Definitely. They should just change the name now so they can really cash in on RGIII's sudden popularity.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56778 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 10:36 am to
Can you link Us to some members of Native American groups expressing their concern with the name of the team?
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
12639 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 10:39 am to
Another example of media trying to be the story instead of just reporting on stories.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Can you link Us to some members of Native American groups expressing their concern with the name of the team?

I suspect that I could, but one need not be native american to find the nickname objectionable, so I say to you: that isn't the point.

In the spirit of clarity: I don't lose sleep over this nickname; it doesn't offend me. This issue isn't very important to me; I'm only having fun in this thread. My opinion on it, in case you care to read it: If there were no Washington team, and the NFL expanded to Washington, and we were in a board meeting to discuss potential nicknames, and I brought up the name "Redskins," the name wouldn't be taken seriously, and I would be told by my boss to act professional and stop saying stupid stuff in such an important meeting. If I persisted with the name and asked earnestly why we shouldn't name the team the Redskins, every reasonable person in the room would agree that the name is racially insensitive and that it would be a grave mistake to name our team that. Therefore, any objection to the decades-old name today (which is a derivative of "Braves," which virtually none of us find offensive, but it's easy to see the obvious difference) is one that I can say is honest and conscionable, even if the objection is one of a complete blowhard. The fact is that, no matter how much this matters to an individual, the name is racially insensitive, and we would NEVER name a team that today if given the chance. That's because it's tacky.

I'm perfectly fine with the Redskins keeping their name. I'm perfectly fine with any social consequence that results from it. I'm perfectly fine with social pressure resulting in a name change. I'm perfectly fine with people being pissed about any possibility. I see it as inevitable that there will be a name change, and if I were Dan Snyder's drinking buddy, I'd say to him, "Look, it's just a stupid name, and one day it's going to change whether you like it or not. Pick your battles, and don't fight this one. Jump out ahead of it, rename the team the Merlins (a bird of prey native to Maryland and a nod to "Wizards"), keep the color scheme and the feathers, and cash the frick in and become richer than Jerry Jones."
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
41700 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 11:32 am to
quote:

anarcy91

Stop watching the NFL.
Posted by 10888bge
H-Town
Member since Aug 2011
8421 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 11:49 am to
quote:

the racist name
quote:

Native Americans coined the term Redskin in reference to themselves. Funny how naive you are to things like historical facts.


historical fact- G.P. MArshall was a bigger racist than George Wallace. Changed the name from Braves to Redskins. His blatant and proud acts of racism are well documented. But hey he used the term Redskin as a nice warm term of endearment for Native Americans.

quote:

His legacy includes the George Preston Marshall Foundation which serves the interests of children in the Washington, DC area. The $6 million he left had the qualification that none of it could be used "for any purpose which supports or employs the principle of racial integration."

This post was edited on 8/11/13 at 11:53 am
Posted by bayou2003
Mah-zur-ree (417)
Member since Oct 2003
17646 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

I've been trying to get the Raiders' name changed to the Oakland Ni****s but everyone in this country is too damn sensitive!


Huh, you better replace that with some Hispanic name. Those frickers run that stadium. Wondering when did they switched from Soccer to the NFL.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106119 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Exactly the same thing as Redskins. NO DIFFERENCE!


Glad we can get on the same page.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69656 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:38 pm to
This is why I sometimes strongly dislike this country's system of government. One a-hole can ruin a good thing for everyone.

This post was edited on 8/11/13 at 12:38 pm
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
68783 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Native Americans coined the term Redskin in reference to themselves. Funny how naive you are to things like historical facts.


quote:

the owner needed to find a new name for his squad. He chose Redskins in honor of Lone Star Dietz,


I don't think what you linked says what you think it says.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 8/11/13 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

historical fact- G.P. MArshall was a bigger racist than George Wallace. Changed the name from Braves to Redskins. His blatant and proud acts of racism are well documented. But hey he used the term Redskin as a nice warm term of endearment for Native Americans.
I don't think that Marshall's racism is even relevant today, though I do lean toward a name change myself. Though Marshall was a racist man, his choice of "Redskins" made sense on a few levels, one of which was that they had moved from Braves field, home of baseball's Braves, to Fenway Park, home of the Red Sox, making it an easy A-to-B name change from Braves to Redskins. Naming the team Redskins wasn't an act of racism, and the name itself isn't inherently racist, though it is by most accounts quite racially insensitive. Being that most of us see that insensitivity, society will one day force the Redskins' hand, and a name change is inevitable. That's why I think it would be best for Snyder to jump out in front of it instead of fight a battle that he knows he will lose.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram