Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

ESPN s Ken Pom model have all the Pac12 teams losing in the Elite 8...

Posted on 3/29/21 at 3:27 am
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35531 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 3:27 am
Zags 75% chance!
Michigan 62% chance!
Houston 73% chance!

Is this low-seed-itis or bias?

The highest rated Pac12 team at 5% odds to win the National Title is USC, surprising considering they'll be going against a semi-pro team of men in the Zags.

Oregon State and UCLA have odds at 2%, the lowest of any remaining elite 8 teams.
Posted by Porkchop Express
Penderbrook
Member since Aug 2014
3961 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 6:22 am to
I always thought that would be the case (whether it was USC or Oregon who won last night). As much shite (deservedly) as the seeding committee got, the Final Four in all likelihood is going to be three No. 1 seeds and a 2 seed.

Of course the way the PAC 12 has played, I will always give them a shot, and will root for them. Even ucla...

The fact the PAC-12 is 12-2 heading in to the Elite 8 (with one loss inevitable with USC and Oregon playing) is incredible in itself.

If the tournament ends over the next two days for the Beavers, Bruins, and Trojans, the PAC-12 has no reason to hang their heads.

This post was edited on 3/29/21 at 10:14 am
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
35826 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 7:04 am to
High seed privilege. SMH.
Posted by Eat Your Crow
caught beneath the landslide
Member since May 2017
9190 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 8:48 am to
I mean, at least this MIGHT get the Pac 12 some respect going into next season.
Posted by Speedy G
Member since Aug 2013
3902 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 9:55 am to
Any ratings will most likely spit out chalk.

Kenpom didn’t give any Pac 12 team better than a 17.5% chance of even making the sweet 16.
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
22680 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 10:05 am to
Kempom got screwed up from the lack of non-conference games. Kempom had the SEC the strongest it's been in awhile. I just didn't see that really.
Posted by jdutto3
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2006
672 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 12:09 pm to
ESPN does not own nor did they create kenpom. Do give those idiots credit.
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 12:11 pm to
The Zags not winning would be the only "shock" for me. They're just too damn good to not make the Final 4/Championship game.


Houston and Michigan can go either way for me, especially considering how well the PAC-12 has performed this tournament.
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 12:12 pm to
Good. I hope all 3 teams go into the Elite 8 games feeling disrespected AF. Don't want them to lose the edge.
Posted by EastBankTiger
A little west of Hoover Dam
Member since Dec 2003
21325 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 12:24 pm to
I can't lie. I would LOVE seeing a USC - UCLA match up in the Final Four.
Posted by Porkchop Express
Penderbrook
Member since Aug 2014
3961 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

I can't lie. I would LOVE seeing a USC - UCLA match up in the Final Four.


USC has won the last four, but two out of the last three were won on threes at the buzzer.

Always a great game nowadays.
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36454 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 1:38 pm to
wow, absolutely insane that statistical models are predicting the better teams to win their games.

more breaking news at 11
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35531 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 1:46 pm to
How are they automatically better teams?

The model is supposed to be on relevant tournament data, not who was just seeded higher.

And it's supposed to be a reseeding model based on the tournament stats.

So whatever he's feeding into his little computer, despite the Pac12's play, doesn't think they match up - shooting %, defense, etc.
This post was edited on 3/29/21 at 1:48 pm
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36454 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

How are they automatically better teams?


cause they were better the entire year?

quote:

So whatever he's feeding into his little computer, despite the Pac12's play, doesn't think they match up - shooting %, defense, etc.

it's crazy, it's almost like the teams the pac 12 schools are playing against in the elite 8 are....the other teams that have also won their tournament games, 3 of which are easily the 3 best teams in the country.

why should usc jump gonzaga? why would oregon state jump houston? and why would ucla jump michigan?

any of those teams can win. they all have very reasonable chances, as demonstrated by the percentages. none should be favored. it all makes perfect sense, i dont know what to tell you.
Posted by Speedy G
Member since Aug 2013
3902 posts
Posted on 3/29/21 at 3:23 pm to
I don't think it is based on tournament stats. It probably just includes tournament game stats.

There is nothing earth shattering about kenpom. It is just offensive and defensive efficiency, with a SOS adjustment. Teams that are more efficient offensively/defensively tend to outscore their opponents often and thus get ranked/seeded higher than teams that are not.

Kenpom had Iowa ranked #5 and Purdue #13. Half of his top 10 were Big Ten schools. His rankings would have yielded an elite 8 of 1s and 2s (i.e. chalk). Big whoop. A kenpom based bracket would have busted the first day.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram