- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:09 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:
The East was stout when MJ was playing those teams
what planet do you people come from?
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:10 pm to SabiDojo
Or Kobe easily. See 2005-2006
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:11 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:Yes. Did you fricking watch it? He was still great in the 95 playoffs. Difference was his team had gotten rid of Horace and they missed him. Wasnt til next year when they added Rodman that they were back to being a great team
You really think he was back to his full self for the 95 playoffs, you're really going to stand by that statement?
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:11 pm to SabiDojo
So you chose one year. How was the rest of the field then vs now? Do you guys forget the Pistons, Knicks, Pacers and how good they were?
Who in the East is that stout now? Or has been outside of a LBJ team that is? This year's big East team the Hawks almost lost in the first round. They just got swept without much work from the Cavs.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:12 pm to rocket31
quote:
what planet do you people come from?
The planet that watched Detroit win back to back then watched the Bulls win 3 straight. How about you?
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:12 pm to Sho Nuff
People thought the bulls would beat the cavs without love.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:12 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:
So you chose one year. How was the rest of the field then vs now? Do you guys forget the Pistons, Knicks, Pacers and how good they were?
Didn't the Bulls and Hawks have a pretty good record against the West this year? You're crazy if you think the East is just so comically bad.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:12 pm to lsupride87
I love how people on this board use my Michael Jordan attacks NOW against him but argued against those very attacks just a few years ago.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:12 pm to Sho Nuff
Just pretend he was injured then and came back during the season.
The fact is, Jordan played in 1995 and lost.
There is no "what if" like he wasn't there.
He played. And he lost.
The fact is, Jordan played in 1995 and lost.
There is no "what if" like he wasn't there.
He played. And he lost.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:14 pm to PrimeTime Money
Nah bro what you're failing to realize is had he not retired, they wouldve won more rings
/s
/s
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:15 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Yes. Did you fricking watch it? He was still great in the 95 playoffs.
Yep, MJ can score. The team wasn't together for a full season. You really don't think there's anything to a team playing together or in this case, having not played together in a year and a half? Cohesiveness.
quote:
Difference was his team had gotten rid of Horace and they missed him.
No doubt.
quote:
Wasnt til next year when they added Rodman that they were back to being a great team
Had M not retired, I'd bet my money on them winning 8 straight. You can choose to say they would have still lost those 2 years in a row. We all have an opinion.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:17 pm to Nonetheless
quote:
People thought the bulls would beat the cavs without love.
Uh, so what does that mean? There always "people" who think a team can beat another.
Holy shite, the LBJ fanboys are uniting here.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:17 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:
Yep, MJ can score. The team wasn't together for a full season. You really don't think there's anything to a team playing together or in this case, having not played together in a year and a half? Cohesiveness.
Translation: MJ couldn't put the team on his back and win a Title.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:18 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
PrimeTime Money
Rockets fan, I'm shocked
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:19 pm to Sho Nuff
No one thought Boston (outside of Boston) would beat the cavs. My point, is that the objective people picked the bulls and hawks to beat the cavs
Youre playing the results by thinking otherwise
Youre playing the results by thinking otherwise
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:19 pm to lsupride87
91 31.1 pts 6.4 rebs 2.5 turnovers 52 %
92 34.5 pts 6.2 rebs 3.7 turnovers 49%
93 35.1 pts 6.7 rebs 2.4 turnovers 47 %
95 31.5 pts 6.5 rebs 4.1 turnovers 48%
96 30.7 pts 4.9 rebs 2.3 turnovers 45%
97 31.1 pts 7.9 rebs 2.6 turnovers 45%
98 32.4 pts 5.1 rebs 2.1 turnovers 46%
He was fine in 95. The team wasnt as good
92 34.5 pts 6.2 rebs 3.7 turnovers 49%
93 35.1 pts 6.7 rebs 2.4 turnovers 47 %
95 31.5 pts 6.5 rebs 4.1 turnovers 48%
96 30.7 pts 4.9 rebs 2.3 turnovers 45%
97 31.1 pts 7.9 rebs 2.6 turnovers 45%
98 32.4 pts 5.1 rebs 2.1 turnovers 46%
He was fine in 95. The team wasnt as good
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:19 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:
This year's big East team the Hawks almost lost in the first round.
What a stupid argument. Last year's championship Spurs were much closer to losing in the first round than this year's hawks team.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:21 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:Teams have injuries all the time that prevents teams from building the cohesiveness they would possibly have if they played together for an entire season.
Yep, MJ can score. The team wasn't together for a full season. You really don't think there's anything to a team playing together or in this case, having not played together in a year and a half? Cohesiveness.
That's a silly argument.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 1:22 pm to Nonetheless
quote:
My point, is that the objective people picked the bulls and hawks to beat the cavs
Not sure about that. I agree that I thought the Bulls had a good shot. And it was close especially with the phantom TO. The Hawks seemed exposed early so I had no thoughts of them beating the Cavs once the playoffs were in effect. As I mentioned, LBJ is one of the best ever so I think he will win most series he's in especially when it comes against a weak team. And the East had them in spades. I mean can we really compare the teams of the E vs W?
Page 15 of 36
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News