- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/18/18 at 9:51 am to Rabbs and QStick
The gf and I will be departing from BR for Buccees Baytown in just a bit. Figure while we're in town we'll go watch JV mow down Boston. I don't post much, but if this is the end of the line, here's a big thank you to all you ardent DATers who keep me posted on my favorite team all year long. Go Stros!
Posted on 10/18/18 at 9:52 am to TH03
It's time to turn the page. As an important part of the DAT community, I think arguing about game 4 should occur in the game 4 DAT thread. We need to focus on game 5. More particularly, my early prediction of Sox in 5 might come true.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 9:53 am to TH03
quote:
At least know the rules if you’re going to complain. The ump can award bases or rule outs according to how, in his judgment, the play would have occurred without the interference.
The ball ends up back in play though, hence the single/double possibility. And not one of the fans reached over the yellow line, someone show me where this is the case. Both guys have their arms pulled back trying to make the play. The guy in the white is non-factor
Betts reached over and out of play.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 9:55 am to gjackx
quote:
The ball ends up back in play though, hence the single/double possibility.
No.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 9:56 am to TH03
I thought it was pretty clear it was in the stands. Calling interference is absurd, he went into the stands trying to make a play. They put way too much stock on the ruling on the field, an umps bang bang judgement call at a bad angle and distance shouldn't be treated as a sacred cow.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 9:58 am to PEPE
Presale for W/S tickets this morning, fellas!
Posted on 10/18/18 at 9:59 am to TH03
He did a great job and being close to the play no doubt.
Like I said 100% confidence though eh.
Like I said 100% confidence though eh.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:00 am to Pnels08
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:00 am to TH03
quote:
No.
Okay, Homerun it is then!
According to MLB Rule 3.16, "When there is spectator interference with any thrown or batted ball, the ball shall be dead at the moment of interference and the umpire shall impose such penalties as in his opinion will nullify the act of interference."
The rule further states that "no interference shall be allowed when a fielder reaches over a fence, railing, rope or into a stand to catch a ball. He does so at his own risk. However, should a spectator reach out on the playing field side of such fence, railing or rope, and plainly prevent the fielder from catching the ball, then the batsman should be called out for the spectator's interference."
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:00 am to DWaginHTown
I remember buying those down 3-2 last year. I also remember thinking "guess I will get them just in case." Ended up at Game 5 last year, so you never know.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:01 am to PearlJam
quote:
I think arguing about game 4 should occur in the game 4 DAT thread.
Oh you mean like how you kept talking about game 3’s catch with tony kemp, you kept bringing up in game’s 4 thread.
Eat a dick Pearl
This post was edited on 10/18/18 at 10:10 am
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:03 am to gjackx
quote:
The rule further states that "no interference shall be allowed when a fielder reaches over a fence, railing, rope or into a stand to catch a ball. He does so at his own risk
Which is why I said the argument should be whether or not betts was in or out of the field of play...
There was no double/single possibility. It was either catch, home run, or out by fan interference.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:04 am to Pistols Firing 12
quote:Damn. I'm not going to lie, you got me there. I was wrong and learned from my misdeeds. Let's not be a DAT community divided.
Oh you mean like how you kept talking about games 3’s catch with tony kemp, you kept bringing up in game’s 4 thread.
quote:mother fricker
Eat a dick Pearl
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:06 am to TH03
quote:
There was no double/single possibility
But there absolutely was if you’re saying they reached into play. I’m not sure how you can assume that ball is a home run any better than you can they reached into play.
If they’re saying they made contact in front of the fence it’s absolutely possible the ball hits the wall if Betts doesn’t come down with it.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:10 am to PropofolPapi
Louisiana Red Sox fans are absolutely pathetic, grow up buddy 
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:11 am to Pnels08
Over the line or past the line? Over doesnt matter. It definitely wasnt a foot into the crowd.
That being said, I definitely thought he reached into the invisible plane and I hate Joe West even more now which I thought was an impossibility.
Gotta win 3 straight.
That being said, I definitely thought he reached into the invisible plane and I hate Joe West even more now which I thought was an impossibility.
Gotta win 3 straight.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:12 am to CQQ
quote:
Keuchel starting game 7
If somehow this ended up at Game 7, you would get some Keuchel, maybe some Morton, and probably even Verlander for a few batters if needed.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:13 am to FiddleHead
quote:
Louisiana Red Sox fans are absolutely pathetic, grow up buddy
carpetbaggers the lot of them , #notmykin
Posted on 10/18/18 at 10:21 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
But there absolutely was if you’re saying they reached into play. I’m not sure how you can assume that ball is a home run any better than you can they reached into play.
Bro it was like 2-3 feet up above the fence. That was either a robbed home run or a 2 run bomb without the fan there.
The only double possibility is it mookie brings the ball onto the field without catching it and even then, it could be an error.
Back to top



2








