- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/27/24 at 4:53 pm to Corinthians420
It was manipulated, that is a fact. You continuing to use your feelings in order to dismiss facts just proves my point.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 4:57 pm to Madking
quote:
Corruption is also defined as:” to alter from the original or correct form.”
In the verb form.
From the example where you got that definition
The file was corrupted.
The proper use of "corrupt" would be "the outcome was corrupted", which it was, as it was negated.
This is specifically not the way you used it originally ITT:
quote:
Using an injury to cancel a game, not make it up and manipulate playoff situation is corrupt. Idolizing the cannon fodder used to open this door and manipulating peoples emotions to celebrate that corruption is the very definition of propaganda.
You specifically did not use a version of "corrupt" as a verb. Let's see how the way you used it is defined by your cite:
quote:
1
a
: morally degenerate and perverted : DEPRAVED
b
: characterized by improper conduct (such as bribery or the selling of favors)
corrupt judges
2
: PUTRID, TAINTED
3
: adulterated or debased by change from an original or correct condition
Take a lap (as usual).
Posted on 1/27/24 at 4:58 pm to Madking
quote:
It was manipulated, that is a fact. Y
Again, disproving your own cited definition. You're relying on the connotation of impropriety with your usage
Posted on 1/27/24 at 4:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
More lies, you omitted part of the definition of course
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:00 pm to Madking
quote:
you omitted part of the definition of course
As I said, you didn't use it as a verb. Why would I use the definition of it as a verb?
Do you not know what a verb is?
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
“Again, disproving your own cited definition. You're relying on the connotation of impropriety with your usage “
Another false statement
Another false statement
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
Such a hypocrite
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:05 pm to Madking
quote:
Such a hypocrite
I can be whatever ad hom you're using, but at least I know what a verb is.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:06 pm to Madking
quote:
Another false statement
just because you don't understand something doesn't make it false. what he said is true, you didn't use the verb form of corrupt, yet you tried to use the definition of the verb.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
The facts are that the process of the season and playoff was corrupted or manipulated and Hamlin was given a reward he did not earn, 2 total tackles this season. If you want to ignore that and continue to spin like you always do that’s fine but insulting me for following the facts just proves you’ll defend those in power regardless of reality the way you always do.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:10 pm to Corinthians420
No what you’re doing is spinning and purposely misinterpreting what I said, ignoring the multiple clarifications and other examples throughout the thread. You wanted answers and explanations and because you can’t refute them you’re playing gotcha by phrase parsing. It’s pathetic and dishonest.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:20 pm to Madking
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:28 pm to Corinthians420
Thanks for proving my point again
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:39 pm to Madking
You still have yet to explain how Hamlin winning the award is propaganda.
What product or ideology is being pushed by giving him the award?
What product or ideology is being pushed by giving him the award?
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:40 pm to Broski
Already explained this and it has nothing to do with political ideology.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:45 pm to Madking
quote:
Already explained this and it has nothing to do with political ideology.
Seeing as no one gets it can you explain it more clearly?
Frankly, I hope you’re like 16. If you’re an adult you need serious help.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:49 pm to higgsBoson
So you really don’t want an answer. Seems to be a pattern with a small number of posters like you. 4 to be exact so no it’s not that “no one” understands it’s only cucks like you who don’t.
This post was edited on 1/27/24 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:55 pm to higgsBoson
You might want to ask yourself why an opinion based on facts causes such a vicious and hateful reaction from you. It’s cult like behavior and what causes that… propaganda, so you’ve answered your own question and proved my point without even realizing.
This post was edited on 1/27/24 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 1/27/24 at 6:48 pm to Upperdecker
Not gonna lie. The comeback with the hoody and glasses was weird as hell, especially IN the suite. Guy must’ve been in a rough place mentally which I completely get.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News