- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chauncey Billups & Terry Rozier next year
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:45 am to hawgfaninc
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:45 am to hawgfaninc
I’m sure there are people already rigging prison league bball. Not sure they’ll find a spot.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 12:14 pm to TackySweater
Unfortunately I've tracked it for the last 8 weeks and have hit 55-65% betting 30+ per week, last week was rough at 44-33 though
I'll post my picks after today's games with a timestamp, I think have ~60 bets down. They'll go >60%
I'll post my picks after today's games with a timestamp, I think have ~60 bets down. They'll go >60%
This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 10/25/25 at 12:17 pm to SECCaptain
quote:
Unfortunately I've tracked it for the last 8 weeks and have hit 55-65% betting 30+ per week, last week was rough at 44-33 though
So you have the data that shows you’re barely over .500. Yet you throw out claims of “all 6 will likely lose” ?
Yea man. You sure figured out how to beat the books lol
Posted on 10/25/25 at 12:19 pm to TackySweater
52.4% is a pro bettor...60% on that volume is borderline unheard of. And my method isn't even doing research, it's simply betting against the public/the money
also fwiw the opening line on Boise State was -21.5, which they didn't cover, and the consensus close was -21, which was a push
also fwiw the opening line on Boise State was -21.5, which they didn't cover, and the consensus close was -21, which was a push
This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 10/25/25 at 12:23 pm to SECCaptain
quote:
52.4% is a pro bettor...60% on that volume is borderline unheard of. And my method isn't even doing research, it's simply betting against the public/the money
Wasn’t sure if you were trolling or not. Thanks for confirming for me lol
Posted on 10/25/25 at 12:27 pm to TackySweater
Aren't you the same skeptic that immediately shut the frick up after I posted my pics that went 27-14 2 weeks ago?
Sportsbooks only exist because they're profitable, how can they be profitable if the side where >55% of the public bets regularly wins?
Sportsbooks only exist because they're profitable, how can they be profitable if the side where >55% of the public bets regularly wins?
This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 10/25/25 at 12:35 pm to SECCaptain
quote:
Aren't you the same skeptic that immediately shut the frick up after I posted my pics that went 27-14 2 weeks ago?
Don’t think so. But maybe.
quote:
Sportsbooks only exist because they're profitable, how can they be profitable if the side where >55% of the public bets regularly wins?
Jesus Christ. For someone who’s a perfect target for sports books, you sure talk a lot about how much you’re “owning” them lol
Posted on 10/25/25 at 12:40 pm to TackySweater
Do you think that I don't realize how absolutely stupid it is? But the results speak for themselves. The point about fading the public being profitable is only logical however, if the majority of the betting public won then books wouldn't be in business
Posted on 10/25/25 at 12:54 pm to SECCaptain
quote:
Do you think that I don't realize how absolutely stupid it is? But the results speak for themselves. The point about fading the public being profitable is only logical however, if the majority of the betting public won then books wouldn't be in business
These games aren’t that entertaining so far. Please keep this up lol
Popular
Back to top


0




