Started By
Message

re: Bonds Guilty of obstruction of justice

Posted on 4/13/11 at 4:48 pm to
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 4:48 pm to
Great quick analysis from NBC

LINK

quote:

Bonds was facing four charges in all: three counts of lying to a grand jury — one each about taking steroids, taking HGH and receiving injections of any kind — and one catch-all count. That was the obstruction charge. I’m not entirely sure how the jury could logically conclude that Bonds obstructed justice but not also conclude that he lied about the three specific topics for which he was accused of perjury. There were no allegations of any other acts of obstruction beyond his testimony. He didn’t destroy evidence, for example. If you have him for obstruction, how do you not have him on everything? What possible act beyond lying — which the jury is saying they can’t agree on — can they convict him of obstruction?


quote:

Now they have a conviction. On one count, and it’s a confusing verdict at that which could very well be the subject of a lot of post-trial procedure by the defense due to its logical inconsistency. If you thought a verdict would bring closure: think again.


Posted by Dr Drunkenstein
Washington DC
Member since May 2009
2918 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 4:51 pm to
Even though Roger Clemens is as guilty as hell, I bet this means that the Govt won't go after him now.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

thanks for proving to us how cool you are by showing your hate for Barry Bonds. very original


R2R LOVE YA BROTHA!!! BUT BONDS IS DIRTY!!!!!!!!!!. And I could really care less. BUT his records should be GONE!!!!!
Posted by jacks40
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
11877 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Even though Roger Clemens is as guilty as hell, I bet this means that the Govt won't go after him now.



well they are already after him
Posted by angryslugs
Member since Apr 2008
11380 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 4:55 pm to
I think they have more evidence against Clemens.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Even though Roger Clemens is as guilty as hell, I bet this means that the Govt won't go after him now.



of course not. the government had to bring SOMEBODY down obviously, and negative public opinion for Bonds pushed him front and center. no way the all-american boy Roger Clemens would ever have to deal with this.

i'm sure tons of fans already lining up a list of other ball players who are good with the media they want to see break the HR record.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

R2R LOVE YA BROTHA!!! BUT BONDS IS DIRTY!!!!!!!!!!. And I could really care less. BUT his records should be GONE!!!!!



as should dozens of other players. but one witch hunt is enough. let's go after one guy that the majority of fans hate and make an example out of him.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

the government had to bring SOMEBODY down



What does this matter??? BONDS is a s guilty as sin. So Is CLEMENS!!! He should get the same thing. ITS so STUPID. ALL OF THIS!!! PISSES ME OFF. I am a BASEBALL FAN, and I am put through this shite. So many players are doing this shite.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

let's go after one guy that the majority of fans hate and make an example out of him.


Disagree bud. He is the MOST PHYSICAL example of this. Don't even try to tell me different.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
175861 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:01 pm to
Clemens didn't do shite PJ.. Stop being a HATER
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

What does this matter???


what does it matter? oh i dunno, how about we just start prosecuting murderers selectively.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

what does it matter? oh i dunno, how about we just start prosecuting murderers selectively.


So he has THREE charges dismissed. OK he is a HIGH PROFILE athlete. THIS HAS GOT TO STOP. If it was me or YOU we would be put in jail for years without all this bull. FACE IT HIGH PROFILE ATHLETES get away with whatever they want. frick BONDS!!! He is a LYING POS.
Posted by TunaTigers
Nola
Member since Dec 2007
5367 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:07 pm to
All a waste of time.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:11 pm to
If it was you or me, we never would have been prosecuted on this BS. Bonds' appelatte attorney must be going ape right now. The jury doesn't convict on any of the perjury counts, but convicts on the obstruction count in the face of this instruction:

"In order for the defendant to be found guilty of Count 5, you must all agree that one or more of the following statements was material and intentionally evasive, false or misleading, with all of you unanimously agreeing as to which statement or statements so qualify."

But they DIDN'T unanimously agree which statement was intentional false or misleading or else they would have convicted him on that count of perjury. Really, this is a bizarre verdict that doesn't make sense by its own logic.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:14 pm to
the jury said that this was the statement that obstructed justice:

quote:

That’s what keeps our friendship. You know, I am sorry, but that – you know, that – I was a celebrity child, not just in baseball by my own instincts. I became a celebrity child with a famous father. I just don’t get into other people’s business because of my father’s situation, you see…


wtf? only POSSIBLE scenario I see here is if it's considered an evasive answer, but yeah.. this verdict doesn't make a lot of sense.
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21955 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

"In order for the defendant to be found guilty of Count 5, you must all agree that one or more of the following statements was material and intentionally evasive, false or misleading, with all of you unanimously agreeing as to which statement or statements so qualify."


This verdict is getting thrown out.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

Really, this is a bizarre verdict that doesn't make sense by its own logic.


I agree with this.


I just want to know WHY doesn't he STEP UP as a man and say he did the shite. Just like all the people that wanted Pete Rose to just say HE DUID gamble on baseball. I am TIRED OF BONDS THINKING he is bettr than ANYONE.
Posted by maxine
Member since Mar 2011
17 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

I just want to know WHY doesn't he STEP UP as a man and say he did the shite


Well for the last 8 years if he would have done that it would have been akin to confessing and putting himself in jail
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:24 pm to
Where is the source that is the obstructing statement? Do you have a link? Thanks.

Because if that's it, how on earth is that material to anything?
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

wtf? only POSSIBLE scenario I see here is if it's considered an evasive answer, but yeah.. this verdict doesn't make a lot of sense.


Do you think he did roids????
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram