- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Better NBA Duo - Lebron and Wade or Jordan and Pippen?
Posted on 6/1/12 at 10:52 am to LSUTil_iDie
Posted on 6/1/12 at 10:52 am to LSUTil_iDie
quote:
I don't think LeBron has that type of defensive skill.
he does
quote:
Not on the level of BB and Scottie Pippen.
lebron is better on D than BB, but probably slightly behind pippen
Posted on 6/1/12 at 10:53 am to LSUTil_iDie
quote:Even if you're correct, that difference in defense is ever so slight lesssss than the difference in offensive skill.
I don't think LeBron has that type of defensive skill
Posted on 6/1/12 at 10:53 am to shel311
Cpt. Bengal always thinks he's right, when in fact he is a fricking idiot. Never mind him bro 
Posted on 6/1/12 at 10:56 am to SlowFlowPro
And FWIW when all is said and done I think Kevin Durant will higher up on the list than LeBron.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 10:56 am to Nonetheless
all right all we need is unknown to show up and it's fricking party.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:01 am to Nonetheless
quote:
Cpt. Bengal always thinks he's right, when in fact he is a fricking idiot. Never mind him bro
running the statistical analysis now...we'll see who is the fricking idiot. Only one of us has a picture of Drake fwiw.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:02 am to CptBengal
Still wondering how 1.5 apg, or 3 points, is not significant.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Yep; some of those differences aren't huge but it's stupid to call them insignificant.
fwiw, doubling the blocks is statistically significant for that reason alone
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:12 am to CptBengal
Don't forget i say words like brah and hater so that means I'm uneducated 
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:17 am to Louie T
quote:All of em added up are certainly meaningful in the context of a basketball game.
Yep; some of those differences aren't huge but it's stupid to call them insignificant
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:36 am to shel311
quote:
Still wondering how 1.5 apg, or 3 points, is not significant.
I compared their season totals using an AR(1) regressive structure and compared the differences in points, blocks, assists, steals, and rebounds...
Here are the results:
Category-----Pr>F
-----------------------
PTS----------0.5256
BLK----------0.0171
STL----------0.9106
REB----------0.0393
AST-----------0.0351
The stats in bold show significant statistical difference between the groups. Stats not in bold showed no statistical significance at alpha of 0.05.
*Kobe had significantly more blocks than Wade
*Kobe had significantly more rebounds than wade
*wade had significantly more assists than Kobe.
This post was edited on 6/1/12 at 11:38 am
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:38 am to CptBengal
quote:
Kobe had significantly more blocks than Wade
quote:
I compared their season totals
Just this year?
Totals?
Didn't use ANY of the numbers I posted and you commented on?
This post was edited on 6/1/12 at 11:46 am
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:39 am to CptBengal
I personally think LBJ is going to have scored the most points in the history of the NBA when he is all done...he needs about 10 years to do it scoring 27 a game. He's extremely durable and just so cyborg-like
Being #1 all time in points would have to make him a top 10 player just based on that right?
Being #1 all time in points would have to make him a top 10 player just based on that right?
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:40 am to Buckeye06
quote:It's his production and efficiency that easily puts him in the top 10.
Being #1 all time in points would have to make him a top 10 player just based on that right?
There's really only one player in our modern era who puts up comparable numbers.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:45 am to shel311
Damn yall are still going on with this.
Its impossible to compare stats from the 80's and 90's NBA to the NBA being played today. Its a total different game in every aspect. In those days you couldnt get by with just sheer athelictism like the Griffins, Howards, Roses, Wades, and LeBrons of the world. In those days the lane was absolutely of limits. It would be like a car wreck if you go to the hole. If that wasnt the case Harold Minor aka Baby Jordan would be one of the best ever
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:47 am to Louisianimal83
quote:
those days you couldnt get by with just sheer athelictism like the Roses, Wades, and LeBrons of the world
Easy there.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:49 am to Buckeye06
quote:He'll be a top 10 play regardless but not because he's going to score 27 ppg for 10 years. No chance Lebron is the same player in 5 years that he is today, let alone 10.
I personally think LBJ is going to have scored the most points in the history of the NBA when he is all done...he needs about 10 years to do it scoring 27 a game. He's extremely durable and just so cyborg-like
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:50 am to shel311
quote:
I compared their season totals
I used the total of each stat for each season in that first comparison.
Now I am providing you with the same analysis averaged per game.
Category-------PR>F
------------------------
ppg------------0.5325
apg------------0.0248
spg------------0.8882
rpg------------0.0620
bpg------------0.0107
Looking at the game averages, at the same 0.05 alpha level:
*Wade has statistically more blocks per game than Kobe
*Wade has statistically more assists per game than kobe
All other categories are not statistically different from one another.
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:53 am to CptBengal
quote:
*Wade has statistically more blocks per game than Kobe
*Wade has statistically more assists per game than kobe
So in other words, exactly what us clowns were saying? Me, Slo, and Louie specifically pointed to those 2 stats.
Is there a way to somehow "add" the other 3? Is it possible that those 3 added would add up to something significant, if that makes any sense?
At any rate, I think I've successfully won this battle, no?
This post was edited on 6/1/12 at 11:54 am
Posted on 6/1/12 at 11:54 am to shel311
Who is trolling who now?
is that a boom?
quote:
At any rate, I think I've successfully won this battle, no?
is that a boom?
Popular
Back to top



1



