Started By
Message

re: B1G being proactive re: NFL players

Posted on 8/25/26 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by kajunman
Member since Dec 2015
8856 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 1:31 pm to
Only because Lane beat them to the punch. If it was Day and OSU, it would be a different story.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
92383 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

still would think any court would side with the class of 2022 guys, considering the 5/5 ruling came out well after they had to declare
What about 2021 guys who declared after playing 3 or 4 years?


I don’t understand why the rule being implemented after they declared holds any weight. So what?
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
25475 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

Laughable if you don’t think the big ten was paying players under the table.



It's laughable if you think B1G schools were spending anywhere near what SEC schools were. You think it's just a coincidence that as soon as the under the table stuff stopped the SEC started losing recruits and players?
Posted by bstaceyau19
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2022
1594 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

I don’t understand why the rule being implemented after they declared holds any weight. So what?


Because the NCAA rule change that is behind all of this started with the fall 2022 guys.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram