Started By
Message

any Pot Limit Omaha players here

Posted on 7/31/17 at 4:41 am
Posted by Ghazi
Dallas Mavs 2011 NBA Champions
Member since Dec 2007
16121 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 4:41 am
(no message)
Posted by MSH
America
Member since Oct 2014
2785 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 5:47 am to
I once smoked a limited amount of pot in Omaha.
Posted by AgCoug
Houston
Member since Jan 2014
5860 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 6:42 am to
I've played PLO a bit. It's arguably a better gamble than Hold 'em, but I'm not very good at it. Plus, it's hard to improve since fewer people play it.
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
28724 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 6:56 am to
Yes I play.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51659 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 7:15 am to
Any shadow boxers in here?
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40510 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 7:50 am to
I don't have the bankroll for it, but I understand it well.
Posted by Big Floppy TDs
Where the beer flows like wine
Member since Sep 2012
2910 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 7:53 am to
quote:

I don't have the bankroll for it, but I understand it well.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422413 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 8:19 am to
it's an interesting game but i've learned that losing pre and post flop edges requires a super soft table AND a great run to really make it work long term. i'm talking live not online
Posted by Seeing Grey
Member since Sep 2015
590 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

it's an interesting game but i've learned that losing pre and post flop edges requires a super soft table AND a great run to really make it work long term. i'm talking live not online


This literally makes no sense, not even sure what you are trying to say.
This post was edited on 7/31/17 at 12:42 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422413 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 1:00 pm to
PLO has a dramatically deceased edge pre and post flop compared to NLHE (not including those words hopefully is the only reason you got confused). in live play, given this loss of edge, the only way to be profitable live is to have (1) a super soft table and (2) run good. you have to have both, b/c a table of grinders will require running white hot to profit above NLHE and even with a super soft table, you're going to be running into constant muli-way pots with all of them holding 4 cards. bloating pots and persons in the pot in PLO makes it close to legit pure gamling
Posted by Seeing Grey
Member since Sep 2015
590 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 1:50 pm to
Well to be fair, that's a pretty important part of the sentence to make sense. However, the statement is still incorrect. Sure, the allin equities are less dominated in NLHE than PLO, which can affect variance, but don't get that confused with affecting possible edge. Thankfully poker is more than just allin equities, which edge is greater 1 80/20, or 10 65/35's?

How you describe PLO is a common view held by NHLE nut peddlers who attempt to play PLO and just write if off as a degen game. However, the skill and possible edge in PLO is larger, especially live, than NLHE. Think about it this way, if you can't get someone into many dominated position preflop in PLO, your opponent can't get you into many dominated positions either. It cuts both ways.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422413 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Think about it this way, if you can't get someone into many dominated position preflop in PLO, your opponent can't get you into many dominated positions either. It cuts both ways.

but my bigger point was that soft games will not give you many single opponent scenarios like this. that's why they're soft. the rec players play too many hands and put in money behind often

the last time i played live PLO, every 6th or 7th hand was a 3+ person allin pre. that's bad enough in NLHE, but in PLO? you're just gambling at that point

*ETA: it's still likely +EV long term, but you'll need an insane number of buyins and hands (Which is tough live). that's why i said you had to have some run good
This post was edited on 7/31/17 at 2:45 pm
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28052 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 2:58 pm to
PLO is better when you have a high and a low

Because you can have the low, and have 3 suckers trying to win high, and continue to raise or bet every round.

I remember first time i played, back in 95, and was dealt 3 a's, the board threw up a pair of K's. I was betting, raising like the Dickens. Pot was super fat, from me raising and guy with boat raising. I flipped over my 3 a's, only to find out i didnt have AAA over KK, i had AA KK. Was a very costly mistake.

Gmae can be very costly if you have a piece and cannot catch. You have to be able to throw away ur cards, trying to draw or suck out will crush you.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14663 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Because you can have the low, and have 3 suckers trying to win high, and continue to raise or bet every round.

I was on the other end of this one time. I had the nut high, guy to my left had the second nut high and another one had the low. I bet limit on every round, call, call. the dude with the low hit joker on the river and made a better high than I had and scooped a huge pot. I nearly lost my mind.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422413 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 3:34 pm to
i saw an $8-10k pot once (5-5-10- game so mega BBs in the pot) with a flush over flush where a guy hit a gutter straight flush on the river. i was playing NLHE and just saw the action and went to observe and was like
Posted by Hogtastic Voyage
Fayetteville
Member since Dec 2010
1357 posts
Posted on 7/31/17 at 9:23 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/28/19 at 7:37 pm
Posted by Ghazi
Dallas Mavs 2011 NBA Champions
Member since Dec 2007
16121 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 6:17 am to
sfp agreed but on average PLO is much softer.
Posted by brucevilanch
Fort Worth, Tejas
Member since May 2011
24333 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:05 am to
quote:

PLO has a dramatically deceased edge pre and post flop compared to NLHE (not including those words hopefully is the only reason you got confused). in live play, given this loss of edge, the only way to be profitable live is to have (1) a super soft table and (2) run good. you have to have both, b/c a table of grinders will require running white hot to profit above NLHE and even with a super soft table, you're going to be running into constant muli-way pots with all of them holding 4 cards. bloating pots and persons in the pot in PLO makes it close to legit pure gamling


This is every point I could have made for why I don't play PLO, and the ones who downvoted you are the guys who 4 bet JJ26 triple suited and think they're ahead pre.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422413 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:49 am to
before i played PLO live i put in a LOT of time learning aspects of the game and i put in like 100-200 hours online (waste of time b/c it's a completely different game). it took 3 sessions for me to truly realize where the issues existed. i mean i had to abandon a lot of NLHE concepts i read over the past year (i've been playing NLHE for only like 18 months after playing limit for years...took 8 years off) because it was written for online play (where a 3 person pot is somewhat rare)

just for an example, i was UTG+2 in one session of 5-5-10 and 3bet UTG's raise to near pot ($150) with a super-strong holding (it was like AAJT double suited or some shite i forget exactly). the entire table calls the 3 bet (Which was large, but they give 0 fricks). pot was 900 on the flop

actually that hand is most notable b/c it was AK8 and i led out pot and a set of K and set of 8 folded. should ahve checked
Posted by gizmoflak
Member since May 2007
11660 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:45 am to
quote:

set of K and set of 8 folded

jeez, they either have you figured out or they are the nittiest of nits
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram