- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Annual LOL at Big 12 March Meltdown
Posted on 3/20/16 at 8:10 pm to WestCoastAg
Posted on 3/20/16 at 8:10 pm to WestCoastAg
RT
0
Posted on 3/20/16 at 8:10 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
The ACC has a decent chance to have half the elite 8. That would be something.
yes it would. syracuse would be bullshite but no issue with the rest
Posted on 3/20/16 at 8:11 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
Still holding out for Miami, Duke, UNC, and Virginia 
Posted on 3/20/16 at 8:13 pm to WestCoastAg
big 12 champs bout to lose in the second round for the third year in row
Posted on 3/20/16 at 8:13 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
Posted on 3/20/16 at 8:14 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
the conference stank is even reaching out to its conference champ 
This post was edited on 3/20/16 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 3/20/16 at 8:20 pm to WestCoastAg
You were the first reply to this thread, dipshit
And still posting.
And still posting.
This post was edited on 3/20/16 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 3/20/16 at 8:23 pm to TH03
i dont see what that has to do with multiple fan bases inside the big 12 obsession with a&m
Posted on 3/20/16 at 9:30 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
I hope I can bump this thread when the FF has 3 big 12 teams.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 9:39 pm to WestCoastAg
Every thread about the Big 12 (particularly Baylor and UT) you guys dominate the thread before the first page even comes to an end.
I for one, am not concerned one bit about the Aggies.
I for one, am not concerned one bit about the Aggies.
Posted on 3/21/16 at 8:46 am to Sevendust912
Sweet 16 teams by conference:
ACC - 6
Big 12 - 3
Big 10 - 3
SEC - 1
Big East - 1
WCC - 1
Pac 12 - 1
ACC - 6
Big 12 - 3
Big 10 - 3
SEC - 1
Big East - 1
WCC - 1
Pac 12 - 1
Posted on 3/21/16 at 10:04 am to Dawgsontop34
40% of the acc is in the sweet sixteen
30% of the big 12 is in the sweet sixteen
In the second round, All 9 of those teams played lower seeded teams that beat higher seeded teams in their first round games.
30% of the big 12 is in the sweet sixteen
In the second round, All 9 of those teams played lower seeded teams that beat higher seeded teams in their first round games.
Posted on 3/21/16 at 10:41 am to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
yes it would. syracuse would be bull shite but no issue with the rest
Far be it for me to defend that stain of a program, but I don't get the animosity towards them in this tournament.
If anything, they are a good demonstration of how flawed the RPI is, how the NCAA needs to move away from it, and how much better some of the other advanced stats out there are. They are now sitting 28th in Pomeroy, ahead of fellow S16 teams Notre Dame and Wisconsin.
They have mauled everyone put in front of them. It's not like they're squeaking through on their chinny chin chins. I think they're going to kick Gonzaga's arse this weekend, too, for that matter.
They had a couple of really good wins OOC and two bad losses then slogged through a tough conference slate and were marred by injuries pretty much all year. They're finally healthy and are pretty clearly one of the top 20 or 25 teams in the country.
BTW, Pomeroy definitely would have been useful in this tournament in particular. The PAC 12 seeding fiasco and subsequent collapse would have been foreseen.
Posted on 3/21/16 at 10:44 am to rockchlkjayhku11
I do kind of 
when we jock mega-conferences with relatively new teams like Cuse, ND, or Louisville for getting a bunch of teams deep.
when we jock mega-conferences with relatively new teams like Cuse, ND, or Louisville for getting a bunch of teams deep. Posted on 3/21/16 at 11:07 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I do kind of when we jock mega-conferences with relatively new teams like Cuse, ND, or Louisville for getting a bunch of teams deep.
The only real reason I care about it is that I wish it helps the committee re-align its priorities and seriously think about changing its selection process.
They place emphasis on the wrong things for the wrong reasons. I think things like the PAC12 collapse and ACC doing well could have been better predicted had the committee done things differently. I think, for instance, Florida State, Georgia Tech, Florida, SDSU, Creighton, and Clemson should have gotten more serious looks over USC, Dayton, Oregon State, and the like. Those were pretty darn good teams that kind of just got lost in the shuffle.
Posted on 3/21/16 at 11:14 am to AbuTheMonkey
ACC is gonna be 6/8 EE
Posted on 3/21/16 at 11:26 am to DollaChoppa
Good thing Bama beat Clemson. Can't have those elitist basketball cocksuckers crowing about running basketball and football
Posted on 3/21/16 at 11:27 am to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
If anything, they are a good demonstration of how flawed the RPI is, how the NCAA needs to move away from it, and how much better some of the other advanced stats out there are. They are now sitting 28th in Pomeroy, ahead of fellow S16 teams Notre Dame and Wisconsin.
quote:
BTW, Pomeroy definitely would have been useful in this tournament in particular. The PAC 12 seeding fiasco and subsequent collapse would have been foreseen.
Agree and agree.
Posted on 3/25/16 at 10:04 am to southernelite
is the big 12 good yet?
Posted on 3/25/16 at 10:07 am to rockchlkjayhku11
Only 2, possibly 3, teams in the elite 8? lol...
/Sarcasm
/Sarcasm
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News