- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: #9 Notre Dame vs Louisville - MSB Edition
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:45 pm to WestCoastAg
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:45 pm to WestCoastAg
Huge dilemma
Do I drink my Wolverine or Gopher Coke?
Do I drink my Wolverine or Gopher Coke?
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:47 pm to WestCoastAg
ND had it defended but it was open.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:47 pm to boXerrumble
He waited way too long to throw that.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:47 pm to sms151t
quote:
ND had it defended but it was open.
Not at all. Dude was wide open.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:47 pm to WestCoastAg
Should we call that play Louie, Louie? :rimshot:
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:48 pm to sms151t
quote:
ND had it defended but it was open.
I guess there was a guy there to make a tackle after a 25 yard gain if the pass was decent.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:48 pm to The Boat
Wrong the Safety was there. He was open. But ND has it defended. It wasn’t going to be 6 like it was meant for
This post was edited on 9/2/19 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:49 pm to sms151t
quote:
Wrong the Safety was there. He was open. But ND has it defended.
No he wasn't. They guy was wide open. It looks like it was defended because the guy waited way too long to throw it.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:50 pm to The Boat
Go watch it again. The safety was there. If he completes it he still doesn’t score.
They wanted that safety to not be there
They wanted that safety to not be there
This post was edited on 9/2/19 at 9:51 pm
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:51 pm to sms151t
quote:
It wasn’t going to be 6 like it was meant for
They would've been fine with the 1st and goal from the 5
This post was edited on 9/2/19 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:51 pm to The Boat
I'm hoping ATT doesn't plan to continue use that summertime loving commercial all damn season.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:51 pm to sms151t
quote:
Go watch it again. The safety was there. If he completes it he still doesn’t score
Because the guy waited way too long to throw it. If he throws it on time the receiver walks in.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 9:51 pm to saintsfan22
Yes but that play was run to score and change the game. Not get a first and goal
Popular
Back to top


1







