- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WWYD: 401K and Roth IRA
Posted on 3/22/26 at 6:49 am to TX_Tiger23
Posted on 3/22/26 at 6:49 am to TX_Tiger23
Last year I would have spent more out of pocket than the HSA is worth. I had a colonoscopy, hernia surgery, sleep doc appointments, general practitioner appts, ENT appointments, urology appointments. With my current health insurance-which is the best it’s ever been by a country mile-not sure the HSA is worth it.
Posted on 3/22/26 at 7:54 am to Arthur Bach
If you ran the numbers then good deal, but I’ve found the only time my HDHP was not the winner was a certain slotted range of spending. If it was a low spend year or a high spend year, HSA came out ahead. Now that’s if I max out the HSA (which I always do). Mine has a reasonable deductible, max out of pocket and employer match, so maybe that’s what helps. However, my plan seems to be similar to most programs.
Posted on 3/22/26 at 9:32 am to CharlesUFarley
quote:
If you truly have nothing invested for retirement at age 40, then in my opinion you should maximize your traditional tax deferred savings before doing any Roth. The reason is that when you retire, at least some of your income will be taxed in the lowest brackets, whereas if you contribute to Roth now it will be taxed at your highest marginal rate.
There are other ways of looking at it, and we never know what future tax rates will be, but you'd be paying 22-24% Fed on your Roth savings now, but maybe only have an effective tax rate of 12% in retirement. Doesn't mean not to save in the Roth, just that your bang for the buck right now is maximum tax deferred before you do any Roth.
The Roth has many advantages which go beyond just the tax issues, so it's not always about the math, but at 40 years old and no savings and a good income.....defer.
I get the sentiment, but think funding a Roth at age 40 could still be the best bet. The tax savings from 25+ years of growth in a Roth could easily be the better route. I had been semi-retired for close to 10 years now and have paid more in taxes each year than I ever expected.
Posted on 3/22/26 at 9:56 am to KWL85
If you are capable of fully funding a large retirement nest egg, then you want a diverse range of accounts to pull your money out of.
The goal in retirement is to control your "taxable income".
Ideally, you have some qualified funds to max out your lowest tax bracket (it is not ideal to have no tax deferred funds).
You can do positive investing into a brokerage account with the extra refund from the qualified funds that you invest today (ira or 401k).
The goal in retirement is to control your "taxable income".
Ideally, you have some qualified funds to max out your lowest tax bracket (it is not ideal to have no tax deferred funds).
You can do positive investing into a brokerage account with the extra refund from the qualified funds that you invest today (ira or 401k).
Posted on 3/22/26 at 10:08 am to Arthur Bach
You would still have a max out of pocket with a high deductible plan. And as the HSA grew you can pay yourself back for that out of pocket expense. And you can pay yourself back many years down the road for past expenses.
Posted on 3/22/26 at 11:42 am to Arthur Bach
Like I said in another post, it's not always about the math. If you are more comfortable with the plan you have stick with it.
I am old enough to have watched my parents in retirement struggle with drug costs before Medicare added prescription drug coverage in the early 2000's, and I've wanted an HSA plan since they were introduced in 2004. I had one briefly in 2007 but it went away when the company was sold. I finally got an HSA in 2020. I only have about 5 more years that I can contribute to it (Medicare is coming), and it won't be that much money, but if it will be vast wealth compared to what my parents had when they first retired.
I am old enough to have watched my parents in retirement struggle with drug costs before Medicare added prescription drug coverage in the early 2000's, and I've wanted an HSA plan since they were introduced in 2004. I had one briefly in 2007 but it went away when the company was sold. I finally got an HSA in 2020. I only have about 5 more years that I can contribute to it (Medicare is coming), and it won't be that much money, but if it will be vast wealth compared to what my parents had when they first retired.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 9:48 am to KWL85
quote:
Good post, but OP should focus on Roth vs traditional 401k in his situation. He is still below Roth income limits and has many years of tax free earnings.
I don't necessarily disagree, but an argument can also be made since he is starting this late in the game, there is a need to maximize the amount of contributions he can make, if he can't max out all three fully. Going the traditional route will lower his taxes and increase available funds for contributions when looking at the whole picture. Generally I'd recommend a Roth too when it is still available to diversify tax vehicles in retirement, but this scenario does open up some other variables that are at least worth considering.
If he has the ability to max out all three regardless, then yea definitely go the Roth route with where his tax bracket is right now. Though I guess we don't know if he has an earning spouse or how they file, which may change all of this
This post was edited on 3/23/26 at 9:53 am
Posted on 3/24/26 at 8:19 am to meansonny
quote:
If you are capable of fully funding a large retirement nest egg, then you want a diverse range of accounts to pull your money out of.
The goal in retirement is to control your "taxable income".
Ideally, you have some qualified funds to max out your lowest tax bracket (it is not ideal to have no tax deferred funds).
You can do positive investing into a brokerage account with the extra refund from the qualified funds that you invest today (ira or 401k).
Agree on having tax diversification in retirement. This is something that should be planned for long before retiring.
But I have become a more active investor in my retirement years, and controlling my taxable income has not been my primary goal. At least not yet. I have made more money than my working days in most years of my early retirement. Some of this is fortunate timing on when one retires, but the income you can earn in retirement years can be more than you plan for. Building a decent amount of wealth over a lifetime can provide good investment options in early retirement years. My real estate investments affect my income in ways that produce income more than just stock market money, so that is not typical. But most of us have our strongest balance sheet of our life during early retirement, which provides opportunity to make more income than one might have expected.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:06 pm to Arthur Bach
Yes, at your salary you should easily afford to max out retirement contributions. You will be so glad you did. Social Security may no longer be there. Even it is there you cannot retire comfortably on social security alone.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:41 am to paulb52
Agree
Agree with this, but will say that also focusing on building non-retirement investments is what allowed me to "retire" early. Which has been one of the best things I ever did. I worked in high stress environment for 35 years, and do not miss it. My point is to fund both types of investments.
quote:
Even it is there you cannot retire comfortably on social security alone.
Agree with this, but will say that also focusing on building non-retirement investments is what allowed me to "retire" early. Which has been one of the best things I ever did. I worked in high stress environment for 35 years, and do not miss it. My point is to fund both types of investments.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:51 am to GoCrazyAuburn
Agree,with everything you said. The decision comes in when one can't maximize both traditional and Roth. This is the scenario where I would fund both when possible vs maxing out either and not funding the other at all. Backdoor allows high income folks to fund Roth.
Personally, I regret the years I didn't do this because I was high income. Would have focused more on Roth than I did if I had a do-over.
Personally, I regret the years I didn't do this because I was high income. Would have focused more on Roth than I did if I had a do-over.
Popular
Back to top

3





