Started By
Message

re: Tomorrow's CPI. Lower than expected?

Posted on 9/13/22 at 10:40 am to
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11869 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 10:40 am to
If their goal is to get CPI down to 2% they will have to get income to go down to change consumer behavior. There's only one way to do that. A soft landing could have only been done by cutting rates to soften the blow of higher cost of living by keeping people employed. Commodity prices, rent and food and discretionary spending are not going to decrease without destruction in the labor force and no income supplements. Committing to policy decision based on 1 variable that gets the most media coverage is a very stupid game. Especially when the media and it's consumers don't understand it.
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13946 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 10:46 am to
I don't think the Fed has the resolve to increase rates high enough to get inflation back down to 2%. You'd be looking at 7-9% interest rates probably to force that. Not gonna happen.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11869 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 10:48 am to
quote:

You'd be looking at 7-9% interest rates probably to force that. Not gonna happen.


Higher rates would make CPI go up without a massive decrease in income/employment. That is the entire problem. They are reinforcing the price increase pressures.
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
38423 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 10:54 am to
quote:

You'd be looking at 7-9% interest rates probably to force that. Not gonna happen.



Three days ago I would have agreed with you. But after speaking to some private equity contacts and hearing JP this morning, I am starting to question that.

Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57979 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 11:21 am to
quote:

I don't think the Fed has the resolve to increase rates high enough to get inflation back down to 2%. You'd be looking at 7-9% interest rates probably to force that.


That depends on the timeframe you're looking to get back to 2% within. If you're wanting to get to that by the end of 2023, then you will absolutely need to raise rates by that much in such a short period. That's also going to likely cause another Depression (because we're talking about 5%-6% worth of rate hikes within a year and a half).

I think they are looking far more long-term, I haven't seen any mention of their expectation but I wouldn't be shocked to find out they aren't expecting 2% until at least sometime in 2024.
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13946 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 11:26 am to
quote:

But after speaking to some private equity contacts and hearing JP this morning, I am starting to question that.


And what is their opinion?
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
38423 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 11:37 am to
Much higher rates. One guy thought 10%.

I think we go to 6%-7% and hold. 10% would destroy us.
Posted by alpinetiger
Salt Lake City
Member since Apr 2017
5864 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Let's see... market is down about 15-20% for the year so I think my dollars, even inflation adjusted, can buy more shares in the indices now than on 1/1/2022. My main holdings are cash, SpaceX, and ORGN. Will redeploy cash into the indices and more ORGN once S&P is in the 3,000-3,500 range here later this fall.


There's two sides to every trade, Einstein. You don't always have to go long on equities and do a rain dance in your back yard. I haven't traded an equity in over 15 years, and I also take long and short positions.
This post was edited on 9/13/22 at 12:38 pm
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13946 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

There's two sides to every trade, Einstein.


This was the easiest bear market to see coming in several decades, the Fed literally telegraphed it for everyone to see last November. I've been clear since then that I thought there was more downside than upside in the indices for the near term. Doesn't mean that individual stocks can't go up even in a bear market though.

quote:

I haven't traded an equity in over 15 years


After making a 4 bagger in under a year with Standard Lithium, I can't go back to boring indices anymore. My curse to bear.
This post was edited on 9/13/22 at 1:02 pm
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57979 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Much higher rates. One guy thought 10%.


He's thinking the Fed Fund rate is going to 10%???? If so, the only thing going that high is your friend.

At this point, I don't see the Fed Fund going to even 5%.
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1800 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

I haven't seen any mention of their expectation but I wouldn't be shocked to find out they aren't expecting 2% until at least sometime in 2024.


Yeah, only recently have I seen the Fed speakers pushing back to 2024. But they have to be right this time. They've been inaccurate so far on everything so I'm sure they'll get it right this time.. Certainly not years behind the curve.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57979 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Yeah, only recently have I seen the Fed speakers pushing back to 2024.


Has someone there actually stated that? I was basing my guess of 2024 off the belief they hadn't made such a statement yet.

If so, I might have to re-evaluate and say 2025/6.
Posted by alpinetiger
Salt Lake City
Member since Apr 2017
5864 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

After making a 4 bagger in under a year with Standard Lithium, I can't go back to boring indices anymore. My curse to bear.
Why are you bragging about your fiat bag then, Gekko? I'll tell you what I don't have. USD. There's no money in it.
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1800 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Has someone there actually stated that?


I went and looked for it. The actual quotes are that they don't see interest rate cuts until 2024 because they want inflation back to the 2% target before they cut. It appears was extrapolating in my mind.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57979 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

The actual quotes are that they don't see interest rate cuts until 2024 because they want inflation back to the 2% target before they cut. It appears was extrapolating in my mind.


Fair enough. I'm going to revise my estimate to "December 2024". A broken clock...

If they bring up the word "transitory" again though, add another 5 years.
This post was edited on 9/13/22 at 1:48 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Much higher rates. One guy thought 10%. I think we go to 6%-7% and hold. 10% would destroy us.


No one in their right mind thinks anything close to these numbers, and the only reason someone would say otherwise is to build pain to recommend their solution.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram