- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
To Roth 401K or Traditional
Posted on 7/16/26 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 7/16/26 at 1:23 pm
I have a generous employer 401K match of 9% and I have maxed my annual contribution for several years. I’ve also been maxing out my Roth IRA and HSA the last few years. At age 41, my 401K balance is pushing $1M, Roth account is $70K and HSA is $55K (I pay healthcare costs out of pocket). I plan to continue this path and hopefully retire at 55 using the Rule of 55.
I have the option to contribute to Roth dollars to my 401K, but contributing Traditional dollars keeps me at the top of the 12% bracket. I’m wondering if having a large traditional balance down the road will force me into significantly higher tax brackets which tempts me to contribute Roth dollars to my 401K. However, it’s hard to intentionally pay taxes of 22% now when I don’t have to. To Roth 401K or not?
I have the option to contribute to Roth dollars to my 401K, but contributing Traditional dollars keeps me at the top of the 12% bracket. I’m wondering if having a large traditional balance down the road will force me into significantly higher tax brackets which tempts me to contribute Roth dollars to my 401K. However, it’s hard to intentionally pay taxes of 22% now when I don’t have to. To Roth 401K or not?
Posted on 7/16/26 at 2:05 pm to Kemosabie
Since you are using the Rule of 55, Roth doesn't really give you any advantages. Just max out the traditional and enjoy the tax savings.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 2:53 pm to Kemosabie
Whats your projected tax situation and any other income sources at withdrawal? Married or single? Heirs? Health care plan in early retirement?
Roth may be useful to top.off income so you dont go over ACA subsidy MAGI limits. Same later when IRMAA starts being calculated off income at 63. Roth not subject to RMDs and heirs receive it tax free plus 10 years additional tax free growth. Then, there's always the risk that tax rates go up between now and then. Remember you arent just planning for withdrawals in 14 yrs at 55 but another 30+ years after. Locking in 22% now may not be a bad trade off.
There really is no one size fits all answer, it is very situation dependent. I'm not saying go Roth over traditional just cant rule it out without much more context.
Roth may be useful to top.off income so you dont go over ACA subsidy MAGI limits. Same later when IRMAA starts being calculated off income at 63. Roth not subject to RMDs and heirs receive it tax free plus 10 years additional tax free growth. Then, there's always the risk that tax rates go up between now and then. Remember you arent just planning for withdrawals in 14 yrs at 55 but another 30+ years after. Locking in 22% now may not be a bad trade off.
There really is no one size fits all answer, it is very situation dependent. I'm not saying go Roth over traditional just cant rule it out without much more context.
This post was edited on 7/16/26 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 7/16/26 at 6:11 pm to Kemosabie
I went through this about 10-12 months ago. Ultimately I decided to pivot towards Roth 401k. As it stands between 401k, IRA, HSA we had approximately 75-80% pre-tax and 20-25% Roth/HSA.
All employer contributions will go to pre-tax and the balance will compound at such a trajectory that without action now we risked substantial RMD and tax “time bomb” for our children.
It sucks to be paying more in taxes since my mindset was opposite all along but this is the right move to give our family the flexibility in retirement to optimize our tax situation.
All employer contributions will go to pre-tax and the balance will compound at such a trajectory that without action now we risked substantial RMD and tax “time bomb” for our children.
It sucks to be paying more in taxes since my mindset was opposite all along but this is the right move to give our family the flexibility in retirement to optimize our tax situation.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 6:53 pm to TorchtheFlyingTiger
We're MFJ and I pretty much plan to stay within the 12% tax bracket (assuming it still exists) for the rest of our lives. I'm thinking if I start doing Traditional 401K to Roth 401k conversions in some low income years, in addition to withdrawing pretax to live off at 55, then I'm projecting my pretax balance to be in the neighborhood of $1.5M to $2M for RMD purposes. Maybe even keep doing conversions as much as possible for inheritance purposes.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 7:14 pm to Kemosabie
MFJ, then be cognizant of the widow penalty. 8 didn't really consider it and now concerned that if one of us passes earlier then widow will be stuck in much higher brackets and face lower IRMAA thresholds. Also realizing I have insufficient space remaining in 12% bracket to make sufficient conversions (but I have a pension and a little part-time income plus dividend and interest income) Coming to realization I should have just stuck to Roth 401k when working and in 22% bracket. Now, more than a few thousand of annual conversions (or withdrawals to spend) also bump my dividends into 15% LTCG bracket instead of zero. So I'm pondering doing larger conversions up to top of 24% so I minimize the years my LTCG are taxed at 15% unnecessarily. Further, if I wait too long to convert I may inherit a traditional IRA and have to draw that down within 10 yrs while also managing conversions of my traditional accounts. Also, if I face a large expense I'll face tax implications that wouldn't be a factor if the $ was already in Roth.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 7:22 pm to Larry Gooseman
You can choose to have employer match be Roth as well. It will just be counted as additional income in the year you receive it.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 7:25 pm to Kemosabie
quote:
We're MFJ and I pretty much plan to stay within the 12% tax bracket (assuming it still exists) for the rest of our lives.
What's your wife's plans?
If you have $1M at 41, I don't see that happening. I think you are going to learn all about IRMAA and RMD's and you'll think very differently about Roth, which you need to do at your age when there is still time for smaller changes to give you big results.
In my opinion, and it is only opinion, everyone needs some Roth assets, at least something like 80% trad/20% Roth, just for flexibility in retirement for things like new roofs, new cars, new AC, so that those things don't force you to bust a bracket and cause a large taxable event. At least with a Roth, you can choose the timing of it.
Another thing pertinent to an early retiree is health insurance. You need to start thinking about it, and planning for it now. One thing some early retiree's do, years before, is start converting traditional IRA assets to Roth. You can withdraw the conversions tax and penalty free at any age as long as the conversion is 5 years old and the account is also 5 years old. People build what's called a Roth Ladder to get through a few years with a lower taxable income which gives them lower health insurance costs. The conversion rules in 401K aren't the same.
It sounds like you don't have any IRA assets to convert, just 401K. Some employers allow an in-service rollover, where you can roll over part of your 401K to an IRA. I've never had it, but if your employer really gives a 9% match maybe they offer that. Most plans allow it only after 59.5, but some will allow it once a year at any age.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 7:57 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
If you have $1M at 41, I don't see that happening. I think you are going to learn all about IRMAA and RMD's
I'm not sure why people keep thinking this. Have you done the calculation of how much you need at 73 to face RMDs that would be more than you plan on withdrawing anyway?
For myself, I'd need to have $5MM or more in traditional accounts before RMDs even remotely become an issue and even then they are easily avoidable. It would never be an issue for myself as I will pull the ripcord on my career way before I'd hit that number. It seems many people have not done the calculations to see if RMDs are actually an issue and just assume they need to fear them.
This post was edited on 7/16/26 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 7/16/26 at 9:52 pm to CharlesUFarley
I wouldn’t recommend this. Any Roth assets should be left for the last bucket you spend. It’s growing tax free. It should be the most aggressive allocation you have.
I do agree with your premise though. But instead of growing just pre-tax and Roth accounts most people should also be growing a non-qualified or taxable account. It’s the most flexible bucket of money you can have. And you can utilize tax loss harvesting to help avoid any major capital gains.
Ideally, you retire with pre-tax, Roth and a large taxable investment account. That way when you’re retired you have all kinds of options.
Many people would be better off later in life not maxing out retirement accounts and just contributing for the match and then growing the non-qualified taxable account.
I do agree with your premise though. But instead of growing just pre-tax and Roth accounts most people should also be growing a non-qualified or taxable account. It’s the most flexible bucket of money you can have. And you can utilize tax loss harvesting to help avoid any major capital gains.
Ideally, you retire with pre-tax, Roth and a large taxable investment account. That way when you’re retired you have all kinds of options.
Many people would be better off later in life not maxing out retirement accounts and just contributing for the match and then growing the non-qualified taxable account.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 10:10 pm to notsince98
Yes, I've done the calculations and when RMD's hit I will be drawing down assets at twice the rate I want to. It's not a threat to my assets, I'll still have enough, and you could always just invest what's leftover, which I will, but I'd rather draw at least some of them down now versus then and have the Roth flexibility later.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 10:15 pm to TX_Tiger23
Once again, there isn't a one size fits all solution here. I don't have anyone to leave anything to. I am not concerned about conserving my Roth. It is logical to draw from it last still, but it was very useful to me for the four years I was retired (starting age 55) before I returned to work.
Posted on 7/17/26 at 2:42 pm to CharlesUFarley
Assuming a 7% rate of return, at 55 I'm projecting my traditional 401K to be $2.8M, Roth IRA to be $350K and HSA to be $300K.
I think I can withdraw ~120K a year from traditional, convert at least $50K - $75K a year to roth 401K and then pull from Roth IRA as needed.
HSA will hopefully fully fund healthcare until Medicare kicks in. I think I can still be in the 12% tax bracket if current limits and std deduction increase 2% a year.
I may be missing something but I think I can get my traditional 401K down to $1.3M by 75 using aggressive roth conversions. Depending on market performance there may be widows penalty to consider
Also, no debt (house paid off).
I think I can withdraw ~120K a year from traditional, convert at least $50K - $75K a year to roth 401K and then pull from Roth IRA as needed.
HSA will hopefully fully fund healthcare until Medicare kicks in. I think I can still be in the 12% tax bracket if current limits and std deduction increase 2% a year.
I may be missing something but I think I can get my traditional 401K down to $1.3M by 75 using aggressive roth conversions. Depending on market performance there may be widows penalty to consider
Also, no debt (house paid off).
Popular
Back to top
3







