Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Tax/income question

Posted on 4/17/19 at 12:52 pm
Posted by Jp1LSU
Fiji
Member since Oct 2005
2542 posts
Posted on 4/17/19 at 12:52 pm
I consulted a professional who gave me the following advice and wanted to vet the info through here.
The situation is that my wife and I are right at the limit every year for being eligible to contribute to a Roth.
It was suggested that my wife (who does real estate on the side) incorporate that as a business. She can then deposit commissions as well as the rental income we receive from a property we own as a business. She can then pay herself a modest salary from the business (which will keep us under the number we need). The only income that will count against us is salaries, and the rental income and real estate commissions won’t affect us.
Is this legit? Even though the house we rent out is in our name and not owned by this business.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89528 posts
Posted on 4/17/19 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

It was suggested that my wife (who does real estate on the side) incorporate that as a business.


First of all - if the money flow is significant - at all - this is almost always going to be good advice, for a whole range of reasons.

quote:

The only income that will count against us is salaries, and the rental income and real estate commissions won’t affect us.


You're misunderstanding the advice. All gross (and net, for that matter) income will "count" to a degree. How it is counted, and what rates will apply (and what will be subject to SS, Medicare, etc.) are all considerations in coming up with an effective tax rate.

And you have far more options doing that within a corporate structure than you do with just ordinary business income without that structure.

It isn't painless. You'll probably have some costs associated with forming and maintain the structure, but I would definitely look into it some more with an eye towards determining if it is right for you. More record keeping. You'll have to maintain a "wall" between your personal finances and business finances, etc., but it will probably yield some overall savings.

quote:

Even though the house we rent out is in our name and not owned by this business.


That would be part of the deal. The business doesn't exists yet. You would have to transfer it to the business for that to be covered by the business structure (which will be transaction and, perhaps, financing costs, etc.).

You're on Step 4 of about a 20-step process. Baby steps, but it isn't all that bad.
This post was edited on 4/17/19 at 1:05 pm
Posted by TheWiz
Third World, LA
Member since Aug 2007
11677 posts
Posted on 4/17/19 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

wife (who does real estate on the side)


Is she with a group paid as w-2 or self-employed and paid as 1099?


Posted by Jp1LSU
Fiji
Member since Oct 2005
2542 posts
Posted on 4/17/19 at 1:27 pm to
1099
Posted by TheWiz
Third World, LA
Member since Aug 2007
11677 posts
Posted on 4/17/19 at 1:45 pm to
Does she contribute to or max a 401k at work?
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11906 posts
Posted on 4/17/19 at 1:55 pm to
So you hire a professional for advice and come to this board to vet the info he/she gives you? Why?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37093 posts
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:32 pm to
So the first question should be, do you need the money to live with? Or is it just going to savings?

We look at LLCs, taxed as S Corps, as a way to save money on self-employment tax. However, what you are looking for is to actually reduce your individual income. A S corp won't solve that issue... all the S corp will do is reduce the amount subject to S/E (payroll) tax. It won't reduce the amount subject to income tax.

To reduce that amount, you would have to form a C Corporation, or an LLC taxed as a C Corporation. Have the commissions go in there, and only pay out as a salary what you need to live on. Let the rest grow.

You will have to pay corporate income tax on what isn't paid out to her as salary. In addition, there are compliance costs involved in all of this.

Further, I would not put the house in the corporation. Why? Because when a corporation sells real property, it's ordinary income, not capital gain income. Plus, you still have to get the cash out, which either means income to her on her W-2, or dividends to her.

You are looking at an awful lot of work and compliance costs to accomplish a Roth contribution. This is not something I would recommend.

Do either you or her have Roth 401K options at work?
Posted by TheWiz
Third World, LA
Member since Aug 2007
11677 posts
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:42 pm to
Depending on whether or not the amount of 1099 money is worth it, maybe look into setting up a Solo/Individual 401k. Not sure what your overall plan is with the money. May be worth researching.

Solo 401k Rules/Examples from WCI
Posted by BamaAlum02
Huntsville, AL
Member since Nov 2005
1010 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

You are looking at an awful lot of work and compliance costs to accomplish a Roth contribution.


And why not do a backdoor Roth? I have some years where I am right in the middle of phase out and I contribute what I can to the Roth, the contribute the balance to a traditional, then convert the traditional.

Great advice in the rest of the post.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram