- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stanford Financial Houston office's raided
Posted on 2/19/09 at 10:05 pm to sneakytiger
Posted on 2/19/09 at 10:05 pm to sneakytiger
quote:
It's a moot point now as the regulators have now thrown the bank into receivership and all but guaranteed that investors eat substantial losses.
Or, its a moot point now that they waited until the investments were underwater.
quote:
Further,I find it a little odd that Stanford, a relatively obscure and small bank, has been garnering so much press and attention over this. Obviously, Allen Stanford's larger-than-life persona has contributes to the story's press-worthiness - but I just don't follow the regulators' logic of pursuing Stanford while "big banks" have systematically destroyed the dollar and buried us under a mountain of debt.
So you think this is some kind of govt/press attack on the guy and there's nothing else going on here?
Posted on 2/19/09 at 10:07 pm to Venicetiger
I would bet my paycheck that at least one of those churches has exposure too.
Posted on 2/19/09 at 10:21 pm to Camp Randall
Churches in Houston?
BR only has what- Bethany and Healing Place?
BR only has what- Bethany and Healing Place?
Posted on 2/19/09 at 10:32 pm to sneakytiger
quote:
I've seen the term "Ponzi scheme" thrown around alot in this thread and in numerous articles... but is that even a fair label at this point? Stanford was obviously misrepresenting these these securities as CD's, which were marketed through the Houston broker-dealer, but has anything been revealed to show that these assets were in fact "underwater"? It's a moot point now as the regulators have now thrown the bank into receivership and all but guaranteed that investors eat substantial losses.
Further,I find it a little odd that Stanford, a relatively obscure and small bank, has been garnering so much press and attention over this. Obviously, Allen Stanford's larger-than-life persona has contributes to the story's press-worthiness - but I just don't follow the regulators' logic of pursuing Stanford while "big banks" have systematically destroyed the dollar and buried us under a mountain of debt. Yet BOA, Wells Fargo, Chase, etc. are all rewarded with billions of dollars and Stanford gets stuck with a subpoena and an order to liquidate.
No offense, but this is some of the most naive stuff I've seen yet. And yes, the assets are "underwater". They've been making up fake returns for years. Or do you think real estate, private equity, hedge fund and equity holdings are likely to have not been down severely in the last 12 months? And presumably you haven't heard about, you know, the drug/money laundering angle with the Mexican mob?
Also, why do you equate receivership with making them eat substantial losses? Receivership often happens BECAUSE of substantial losses, not before them.
You think, it's odd that the media are highlighting an $8B dollar fraud? Are you nuts? Before Madoff 2 months ago, it would have been the biggest fund fraud of all time. For chrissake, man, we're talking about CD's going to zero.
Posted on 2/20/09 at 10:53 am to Tiger JJ
Hossana is going to have some real problems because Jason Green was one of the major supporters of that Church and on the Board.
The CDs were not insured by the US government. One of the wealthiest individuals in that of Louisiana was a victim in this thing and I understand she has lost almost everything. Also hearing a major B.R. developer was a victim. The victims in BR will be emerging over the next few weeks as the lawsuits start hitting federal court.
The CDs were not insured by the US government. One of the wealthiest individuals in that of Louisiana was a victim in this thing and I understand she has lost almost everything. Also hearing a major B.R. developer was a victim. The victims in BR will be emerging over the next few weeks as the lawsuits start hitting federal court.
Posted on 2/20/09 at 10:55 am to MrLSU
An associate just told me he heard that an attorney who was heavily invested in Stanford committed suicide this morning. Anyone hear anything about that?
Posted on 2/20/09 at 11:08 am to MrLSU
quote:
An associate just told me he heard that an attorney who was heavily invested in Stanford committed suicide this morning. Anyone hear anything about that?
I think it was a local defense attorney. Appears unrelated.
Posted on 2/20/09 at 11:19 am to MrLSU
One thing is certain, rumors are flying.
Posted on 2/20/09 at 12:39 pm to Camp Randall
quote:
One thing is certain, rumors are flying.
correct. although, I should still emphasize that, regardless of BR's exposure, I expect the capital losses to be significant.
Posted on 2/20/09 at 3:21 pm to Tiger JJ
quote:
As of Thursday afternoon, he says he's heard from 200 or more people who say they lost money, and a dozen were from the Capital Region. "Baton Rouge seems to be one of the clusters of Stanford victims," says Dunlap.
quote:
It may take seven to 12 years to finish repaying victims of the alleged $8 billion fraud masterminded by Allen Stanford, an attorney told Bloomberg News. Michael Goldberg, a Miami attorney who has handled 30 Ponzi scheme cases says the sheer complexity and scope of the case will make it difficult for the receiver to untangle Stanford's finances.
quote:
Area financial executives estimate between $200 million and $300 million is in the CDs under investigation and that Stanford’s entire Baton Rouge book is close to $1 billion."
LINK
This post was edited on 2/20/09 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 2/20/09 at 3:27 pm to Cash
JR Ball? Isn't that the old Tiger Rag guy?
Posted on 2/20/09 at 3:29 pm to Cash
quote:
if it's $1B
I'll take the under big time.
Looks like my bet of putting the farm on the under was spot on.
Posted on 2/20/09 at 3:41 pm to Cash
I don't understand his math on how he gets to half a bil in losses.
Posted on 2/20/09 at 3:55 pm to Tiger JJ
I think he means $200-300 mil in BR plus $250 mil in Lafayette - approximately $500m in the region.
And I think Ball used to be associated with the Tiger Rag magazine, maybe editor, but don't remember for sure.
And I think Ball used to be associated with the Tiger Rag magazine, maybe editor, but don't remember for sure.
Posted on 2/20/09 at 4:01 pm to Cash
Sir Allen Stanford: "It's fun being a billionaire"
[link=( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jy128-WoYHk)]LINK[/link]
[link=( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jy128-WoYHk)]LINK[/link]
Posted on 2/20/09 at 4:07 pm to Venicetiger
Speaking of failed banks and CDs, even if you don't lose your entire investment, you're not well off. LINK ][LINK]
ETA: Taking it in the arse was overdoing it.
ETA: Taking it in the arse was overdoing it.
This post was edited on 2/20/09 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 2/20/09 at 10:04 pm to Cash
quote:
I think he means $200-300 mil in BR plus $250 mil in Lafayette - approximately $500m in the region.
Check that!! I reconfirmed it today as I met with the CEO and Pres of Bank in Laffy, $100M in Laffy and $800M in BR so far and those figures are sure to increase.
Posted on 2/20/09 at 10:15 pm to tgrbaitn08
I'm just going off of the BR Business Report article. Although clearly it is not as good of a source as random internet poster claiming to have a friend in banking.
Posted on 2/20/09 at 10:16 pm to Cash
Thing is, I have a feeling its true.
and I hope its not that group that got together and bought a bunch of stuff in Costa Rica.
and I hope its not that group that got together and bought a bunch of stuff in Costa Rica.
Popular
Back to top


0


